Pokémon: Farming, Blocking Bridges, Searching, Fighting and Retreating!

Next time, I will write about farming specifically and add some seasoning elements.

Investigation report: "Number"-672 Investigation target: "Pokémon: Block the Bridge and Bring Bankila!" -Male protagonist-[Xia Ming] Investigation result: "Reincarnation" Judgment basis: Abnormal characteristics: The time-travel investigator, as the name suggests, is a cross-travel investigator The profession of investigating and recording the travel situations of those who travel across the world aims to let observers (that is, readers) in all worlds know in advance the travel situations of travelers in this world, and volunteers to provide observers with a quick query service for travel information If there are any errors, Wan Wang will correct me ——Zhenjun Wanling Feast Stay on June 12, 2026

My favorites are Bandera and Groudon

Because it was too big to take a group photo, it was displayed in three groups. By the way, the author hid the details in the picture, hehe~

The subject matter is good, but the writing style is a bit average. It's okay for daily life. The battle scenes are really not interesting. Maybe you focus on the thrill of the wild battle and the perseverance of the trainer to continue to command after being beaten, but to be honest, it doesn't feel like it.

You can search, attack and withdraw, you can also farm. But if you have to write so many emotional scenes, the impression will not be very good. As for the Pokémon theme, of course you have to watch Pokémon. You just wrote so many emotional scenes and didn't rewrite the training, battles, and interactions with Pokémon. To be honest, it may not be that good.

Come on, brother, the idea of ​​combining search, attack, and retreat with Pokémon is so good, you can completely abandon farming and start a new one. Time is the most precious thing for writers who can write good ideas. Don't be hard on yourself.

The idea is good, although the gameplay of farming and search, fight and retreat are a bit separated. But the description of eating Pokémon at the beginning is really boring. To be honest, the illustrations are sometimes just fun to draw. The design of the sturgeon highlights that people have lost their hearts for the sake of design. Pokémon has basically described the characteristics of Pokémon as a highly intelligent creature for so many years. In the early design of the game, the positioning of pets and tools has conflicted with the current design of family fun, so there is this bad debt. The weak gf does not dare to describe the black and deep cripples and does not dare to directly explain what to eat, which is why there is an elephant in the room and the nasty description in the illustrated book. But to write a plot where both parties are obviously equal and family fun, why do you insist on eating Pokémon meat? No matter how much you apply a patch and say it was obtained legally and compliantly, you are still eating the same highly intelligent life form, especially the people in the Pokémon world are most likely a type of Pokémon. They eat the same kind. No matter how you say eating can be regenerated, you are also eating the same kind. It is really difficult to eat the flesh of other Pokémon while you are fighting with your own Pokémon, and then turn around and eat the flesh of other Pokémon. ✍🏻What about horror novels? Forget it about Slowpoke, are you sure Kentaro's meat isn't Lingchi? Not to mention that no matter how legal and compliant it is, writing it this way means that it must be illegal. The family-friendly atmosphere at the beginning is immediately broken, and I feel uncomfortable even if I want to continue watching it.

Tasteful, young Kiras is cute 😠

Block the bridge, lead, go to work, Kira () The first time I saw Kira, who was thinking about going to work, what kind of death was it? ()

It is completely different from other elf novels that talk about farming but don't write much about farming at all. It really writes about the farming feeling that makes me feel comfortable. It's great It's very interesting.

With your setting, it's hard for me to understand why you didn't choose Aluminum Dragon, a young genius who blossomed early.

The author has a new idea, combining the popular Search, Fight, and Cancel with Pokémon. Pokémon also combines the dark flow with game animation, but the writing style is too immature, and it just doesn't feel like reading. I hope the author will continue to work hard

It's a pity that I lost, but it's normal and rare. Otherwise, I'd better just write about wild fighting. I'm a super sincere person who strengthens my body.

The idea is very good and the description is not bad. Good luck to the author.

I want to know if there is only one female protagonist in Stardew Valley or if there is a Pokémon female protagonist?

Will the fruits grown have special effects, such as permanently enhancing certain attributes?

I have to take a look at the private house.

The Pokémon text is not divided into paragraphs. It looks laborious. How can there be so many long paragraphs in the top of the new book list?

It would be better to have more battle fun and jokes and increase post-war supplies to stimulate readers' interest.

Come on, author, take your time. After all, it is normal for the first book to fail to grasp the rhythm. Many veteran authors also make this mistake, so just practice writing. So far, I personally feel pretty good. Come on, there are fewer and fewer Pokémon fans.

Pokémon Blocking the Bridge is very creative and interesting, and what's even more surprising is the story about Pokémon using Stardew Valley as a medium.

The author writes well, well, as long as he can finish it, the number of words doesn't need to be too many, I will always subscribe to support

As long as you continue to write, you will automatically subscribe 😁

Author, I would like to ask, you, the heroine, should be a character in the Stardew Valley MOD, right? When I play Stardew Valley, I only play the original version and not the MOD. I'm not sure. Is this the only female protagonist I see in the comment section?