I Was Just Telling a Story, So Why Is the Whole Internet Telling Me to Turn Myself In?

The theme of Stove was seven or eight years ago, but it actually appeared in Pianzi, which shows that the readership of Pianzi has undergone earth-shaking changes.

Every time I get panicky, criminal psychology experts with passive skills start to come out and take the lead.

Who on earth is reading this kind of AI article🙂

1. The protagonist's mentality is fragmented: he is calm on the surface, but collapsed on the inside, and the portrayal is extremely awkward 1. The real reaction of normal people should be layered like this Being taken away by a broken door, handcuffed in public, and locked in an interrogation room, the first reaction of ordinary people is humiliation, panic, and anger. Even if they know in their hearts that they are innocent, they will be tense and depressed on the outside, and they will not show off in the whole process. A reasonable way to write it: On the outside, he pretends to be calm, but on the inside, he is afraid of getting into trouble with the system, afraid of leaving a criminal record, and worried about rumors among the neighbors. The contrast between the inside and outside is "forcing calm"; But when written, the book completely changes: on the inside, he is crazy and breaks down and curses the system, but on the outside, he deliberately pretends to be cool and calm and leaves the scene without any grievance or anger. 2. The protagonist lacks the awareness of rights protection that ordinary people should have throughout the whole process, and his character is hollow and cowardly In reality, there are many loopholes in the law enforcement of this matter, and there are completely reasonable rights protection channels: 3. Only summons, no arrest procedures, violently destroying rental houses and damaging personal property; 4. Wearing handcuffs in public in public, only a suspect without conviction, seriously damaging personal reputation and causing mental distress; 5. After checking the complete alibi and completely eliminating suspicion, the police hastily released the person without apology, property compensation, or clarification statement. Any ordinary person who has basic common sense and knows how to protect their own rights and interests will definitely demand: compensation for house damage, a written apology, community clarification and elimination of rumors, and even supervisory complaints, administrative reconsideration and accountability. Su Qing, who leads the team. But the protagonist endured the whole process, suffering property losses and social humiliation in vain, with no thought of holding people accountable or complaining. His character was as thin as a tool that only pretended to be cool. It was completely inconsistent with the logic of normal people's actions. It looked aggrieved and violated. 2. The entire law enforcement process is distorted, and the official handling is completely inconsistent with the actual standards 1. The summons and arrest procedures are completely confused Violent breaking is not allowed in verbal/written summonses; only with an arrest warrant, search warrant, and in legal emergencies can forced breaking of the door be allowed. Kicking down the door of a rented room just for summons and questioning is itself an irregularity in law enforcement. 2. Suspects are shown in public and handcuffed. There are strict regulations. Only summoned subjects who cooperate with the investigation have no violent resistance or risk of escape. In principle, restraints are not used. Even if handcuffs are worn, public humiliation in residential areas and neighbors will be avoided as much as possible to protect the reputation of the suspect. 3. The aftermath mechanism after the suspicion is eliminated is a mandatory requirement When complete evidence proves that the party has no possibility of committing a crime and the summons is lifted, the standardized process includes: - Apologize in person and explain the misunderstanding in law enforcement verification; - Compensate for property damage caused by law enforcement; - If it causes adverse social impact, appropriate clarification is required to eliminate the negative impact. Everyone in the book is cold and cold, with no apology or compensation at all. They completely erase the aftermath and correction mechanisms of the public security team, just to maintain the paranoid and arrogant character of the heroine and deliberately weaken law enforcement norms. 3. The emotional description of the characters is deliberately antagonistic, deliberately creates a sense of opposition, and is divorced from human nature 1. The special police and all the police officers had cold faces throughout the whole process, without any guilt of "misunderstanding others"; 2. Su Qing was still immersed in his own subjective thoughts, without any apology for reflecting on violent law enforcement and unreasonably doubting others; 3. Everyone only wanted to be wary of the protagonist, completely ignoring the dual damage to ordinary people's property and spirit caused by this case. In order to maintain the conflict of "the police are hostile to the protagonist", the author directly deleted the sense of propriety and empathy that law enforcement officers should have in reality, and made the entire police station into a cold and unruly image, just to pave the way for subsequent rounds of slaps in the face. 4. Summarize the core shortcomings 1. Failure in shaping the protagonist: emotional separation from inside and outside, blindly tolerating when things happen, abandoning the anger and rights protection instincts of ordinary people, just to satisfy the pretentious persona of a "chicken master"; 2. A complete breakdown of common sense in law enforcement: violent summons, public humiliation of suspects, wrong investigations There is no remediation afterwards, which seriously deviates from the real police case handling standards; 3. All personnel are instrumentalized: from the captain to the police officers, everyone gives up basic empathy and professional bottom line, just to continue to create conflicts with the protagonist. The logical flaws are piled up, making it frustrating and awkward to read. You are absolutely right. In reality, any ordinary person who suffers such treatment as breaking into the house without formalities, being handcuffed in public, and having his reputation damaged will definitely file a complaint and be held accountable in accordance with the law. The protagonist's forbearance without any reaction is purely because the author forcibly reduces his intelligence and sacrifices the rationality of the character for the sake of the plot.

Written 20 years ago, classic female police officer, classic police arresting people without evidence, classic showing ability to solve crimes in front of the police

Che Zhuglun's back-and-forth story revealed that the plot could not stand up to scrutiny at all, and the police had to resort to intelligence throughout the entire process.

Unable to be misled by reviews, I decided to make my own decision. Turns out the comment was right.

When I go to such an obvious AI, the context is inconsistent and the starting point is also posted.

It's ugly as hell, I wrote jc without any brains at all, all I can do is yell🤢🤢🤢

There must be a police beauty in the police station. The police called the deceased young master instead of his name?