Singer's Light: Pride and Prejudice

Novel title: "Singer's Light: Pride and Prejudice" 2095, Singapore. When nanorobots can back up human memories, and when death is no longer the end of consciousness, how should the law define "truth"? The famous lawyer Iris died in a secret room, and all evidence points to her lover, criminal psychologist Caine. The perfect alibi, truncated memory images, and unexplainable motives constitute a seemingly unsolvable trial. But as the investigation deepens, Superintendent Lin Miao of the Crime Unit discovers that the murderer may not be Caine, but the way Iris chose to die. This is a sacrifice about the dignity of memory, a gentle impact on the judicial system. When technology can record everything, do humans still have the right to "not be seen"? When love becomes complicity, does the truth still matter? Near-future science fiction × legal reasoning × technological ethics - in an era where memories can be uploaded, how do we prove that "I" is "I"?