London Data Anecdotes

If you read 'Character dies but reappears', please look at the ledger time in the chapter title - this is a record of his life, not a resurrection after death. The time in this book is the ink on the ledger, the characters are the numbers in the ledger, and the cause and effect are hidden in the recursive functions. Each plot is an input parameter for the next one. You don't have to rush to sort out the order. Just like the protagonist trapped in forty-six years of chaos, allow yourself to read with doubts - the later 'functions' will always call the previous 'variables'.

I think this story is more suitable to be made into a game

At a glance, half the page is full of names 😅

Starting from 1.1, The female worker's cough was light and smelled of cotton wool; in 1.3, The mother recalled that when she was weaving, her cough smelled like silk thread, and she coughed more frequently; in 1.6, My grandmother said that there was lint in the sputum when she coughed, and she couldn't stop coughing; in her posthumous letter on 1.10, My mother mentioned that she coughed like a broken bellows in her later years, echoing her grandmother's description back then. Each generation's coughs and symptoms are aggravated, and the reasons are related to textile work. Using the detail of cough, the devastation caused by occupational injuries to several generations is silently stacked together. This ambition is really big, but the threshold is a bit high and it is hidden too deeply.

Very powerful. It is much harder to write less than to write more. But I have never seen this kind of thing. Why do you write it like this? Names, dialogue, repeated messages. Why is it written like this.

It feels weird, but I still want to watch it

Objectively speaking, this book has no market and is generally difficult to read. There are probably three reasons. First, there are too many dialogues and the plot is bland. Second, this subject matter should be unpopular in online books. Third, the writing style that the novel has always been exquisite is also average here.

Which editor signed the contract for you is really discerning. Please recommend it.

The core dislike is that it's too Western and the characters have no sense of empathy.

I admit that my IQ is not enough. I feel that the timeline is too confusing. I don't have the ability to sort it out at all. It's too strenuous.

I read two more chapters. The story started to get scary, or the setting as I understood it became scary. 1. Accounts. I accept that this is just an account book and it only has entries. Of course there are no characters and no time. There is only the record itself. I also accept that there is no cause and effect between the year before and the year after. After all, accounts are dead things, and there should be no cause and effect between the previous page and the next page. And they better have no cause and effect... Otherwise my brain will start to get endlessly confused. 2. Then there is Dr. I can still smile when the PhD itself appears as a parameter and entry in the accounts. But when I think about him still recording, I stop laughing. He kept looking back at the previous entries and coming to new conclusions. Then use new conclusions to draw updated conclusions. He began to find that his conclusions were in conflict with each other... And set out to correct this error. He went through the previous accounts again and came to a conclusion. You'd better tell me that I'm overthinking it.

I think the author can look at other more famous works and see how they handle dialogue. Because I just read the first chapter, which is all in the form of ":". The introduction of the book is somewhat attractive, but the dialogue is really painful to watch.

After reading more than 20 chapters, my feeling is: it looks good, but I can't understand it. The author is NB!

I think this conversation is very touching. Is the man in the dark coat the protagonist himself who has traveled through time?