
Witch Investigator
魔女调查员
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 847k Words
- Genre
- Western Fantasy
- Subgenre
- Sword & Sorcery
- Updated
- 4d ago
- Source
- Qidian
Synopsis
214Chapters
24Votes
8.2kRecs
23.9kFans
Readers also read
Warhammer: Notes from the Nord Hold
Offering Cards to an Unkind Otherworld
Greece: I'm Really Not a Demigod
My Magic Has Entries!
Republic of China Film and TV: Starting as the Heir Who Squanders the Family Fortune
Witches, the Church, and Black Powder
A Thousand-Year Journey That Begins with Controlling a Young Woman
Reborn in Hong Kong’s Entertainment World: I Turn Movies into Myths
Hong Kong: 1979
A Survival Guide to the Magical Girl World
What Witch? I'm a Deadly Apothecary!
Echoes of the Old Days
Reader comments 41
Translated by Google Translate
The author has written so many books, why is his writing style still so poor? The original text is posted below There were also a few real little witches at the banquet. Their natural childishness was clearly visible, and coupled with their original childish appearance, they seemed inexperienced in the world. However, most of the witches were the kind of children who had not grown up. They looked childish and lived in their own world, but exuded a different kind of maturity. Everyone was a little adult, but these little adults pretended to be innocent little girls. In this paragraph alone, you can see errors such as semantic repetition, logical confusion, and improper word matching Semantic repetition: two young children appear in the same sentence, which is a taboo in writing. It is better to change the latter one to immature. Confusing logic: It was said before that the witch is a child who will not grow up, and later it was said that the witch pretends to be a little girl. Why does the child pretend to be a child? Improper word matching: Exuding and maturity cannot go together. It should be: exuding mature temperament or showing maturity. I like the author's ideas very much, but the writing style is hard to compliment
Is there something wrong with the author's understanding of private ethics? Isn't this a normal investment?
I can't figure it out. Isn't this a normal academic investment? Why do you think your predecessor's personal ethics are corrupt? It's not like he's monopolizing the results, he's just adding his own name to it. Anyway, everyone knows the actual situation of the predecessor, which was just a waste of money to gain fame. Therefore, even if his name is added, it will not affect the academic honor of the original author. Without this investment, you won't even be able to achieve results. If you don't feel comfortable, don't accept the investment! On the other hand, Veronica's father is the real one with questionable personal ethics. He accepts investment from others and backstabs, and his daughter also has questionable moral character. He is really not a bad person who does not belong to the same family and is inherited from the same family! And this Veronica, her father died because of her magic, but she directed her hatred towards his father's investors, without distinction between right and wrong! In name, you want revenge, but you dare not target the upper class, bullying the weak and fearing the strong! She completely ignored the fact that her father accepted investment from her predecessor but turned back the money. She only remembered that her predecessor had suppressed her father, hypocrisy and double standards! It is ungrateful to slander the protagonist while receiving high-quality guidance from the protagonist when you can choose not to attend the class! Why do such disgusting people want to resolve their grudges? Why bother to coach her? Just think of a way to trick him to death.
A watered-down remake of the Maozhan book?
The title and introduction of the book are all fake, essentially a nanny article. There is no main line at all, the process is just a babysitter. This chapter will take care of this one, and the next chapter will take care of the next one.
It's time to open the prison fox blind box again, will you win, kids?
Why do book reviews place so much pressure on the author? What is 🐢? As a professor, teaching and answering questions is considered to be attentive. Is it hard to understand why the protagonist is so overwhelmed with debt in the early stage and must be careful not to make mistakes at work? Where are the female supporting characters with all single arrows 🐢? I asked why there are no more updates. There are so many fake people in the book reviews that I'm exhausted.
Things can only come in threes, remember this law! I wrote hundreds of thousands of words but didn't push the main line at all. Various riddle plots. Do you expect someone to subscribe to this endless riddle? A riddle, a riddle. Just questions without answers. It can only be read free of charge. Anyway, I will not pursue it. Those who pursue books will have high blood pressure.
There is no main plot. It feels like the protagonist has no idea what he wants to do. It doesn't matter if the spy mission fails. He doesn't know what he is busy with. Pursuing magic? Teaching and educating people? Earn wealth? What are your internal and external sources of motivation? The description of other characters is also difficult to describe. Maybe you have already finalized the characters in your mind, but I have never seen any character in your book that is even remotely attractive, especially the Witch Principal. Who are you? Why do you ask me to work? Do you know that you are annoyed?
I also want to play picking up corpses along the way. Sequence contamination is so strong
That's not to say that you can't rely on the predecessor to cause trouble to start the game and advance the plot, but you can't do it again and again, right? Good guy, not all the dilemma is explained at the beginning. The plot is flat and a paragraph is pulled out to make it more difficult for the protagonist. It relies entirely on wiping the original person's butt to advance the plot. The protagonist basically gets no positive feedback as the plot progresses. It was painful to watch.