Marvel: My Umbrella Corporation Has Always Served the People

The gold finger setting is a bit awkward, and the identity is set high, but if it were me, the meter would start to turn upside down. Your logic makes me angry and fumes, and there is no essential difference. This is a moment of gratitude.

In fact, it is very unreasonable. You, a tyrant chaser of all kinds, can tell at a glance that they are the product of various human experiments. The bad nature of those heroes has come to your doorstep a long time ago. Iron Man even wants to buy a tyrant from you. If he doesn't kill you, that's fine.

Indeed, from the first chapter, there is a sense of pettiness

Instead of benefiting people's livelihood, it is better to save people's livelihood from water and fire. As for how water and fire came about, don't ask?

What can I say about what the author wrote? Not only does it lack logic, but it also lacks emotional rationality. What the characters do is often thought up as they come up. It's okay to smoke, but it's a little "opinionate" to send a knife. I don't know why I stole the reactor. Logically speaking, I don't care about the other party's character. I took it because you just blew yourself up. Emotionally speaking, you can talk to Tony. You have saved him twice, so it can be discussed. The protagonist's character is extremely flat. Going to the kitchen can obviously be a turning point. He doesn't have enough humanity to have a certain humanity, but there is no such thing. The management of subordinates is a mess, where is the spider virus? You can obviously have a hundred ways to write, what will the other party do first, or you predict what to do, or explain the situation and then demote. Anyway, there are many methods, but it is to write that the front foot is not accepted, and then a bunch of people say that the protagonist is good, and then the person who "feels insufficient and does not accept" is directly killed? ???? Just did it. It's really good Nanbang here. You really can't write about solidification of loyalty. Although this may make some people feel uncomfortable, it is better than killing a meritorious person just because he feels that his ability is insufficient, right? Ah? What does it mean? This is actually not a bad point, but combined with the previous kitchen scene, it seems strange. What are the thoughts and tendencies of your protagonist?

It's strange. I don't think Pig's Knuckle controls the Umbrella Company. After so many chapters, I haven't seen the subjective initiative of the person at the helm. Instead, he seems to be a security director who controls some of the force. And shouldn't such a person who inherits the company hold a board of directors immediately? Even if you can't control the company, you should at least let others know that you are at the helm. People and justice cannot be borrowed from others. Moreover, Pig's Foot's nominal father died, and the death of a big capitalist did not cause any turmoil.

From the chapter about stealing the reactor, I felt that the layout was so small and systematic, and the reactor also had a radiation version. It was obvious that it could be taken away openly, but yet it was still stolen.

There are two things that Marvel has no solution for, one is cancer, and the other is zombie viruses.

Recently I have watched too many inhuman protagonists living in the United States. Not only do they play with personalities, but they also turn to cannibalism. If I watch it again, does it mean that I agree with it, so I still don't watch it. No matter how many explanations are given in the book, no matter how lofty the purpose, the protagonist cannot be changed from being inhumane.

Generally speaking, there are too many poisonous points and unreasonable places