Reborn in the Courtroom: Starting as a Criminal Court Clerk

Ning Xiaoxiao's two actions upon her introduction—sending someone to deliver gifts to her office—were foolish; buying law books herself was idiotic. Such a character was absolutely necessary; her absence wouldn't affect the plot, and I certainly don't want any romantic development between them.

It's well-written, but the subject matter is sensitive. I hope it doesn't involve palace intrigue. Actually, using novels to popularize legal provisions is quite good, but the level of detail is hard to control. Keep it up, author! As someone who has worked in the court archives, I feel a sense of familiarity reading this kind of novel.

The author strives to use a series of court rulings to help even ordinary people with little legal knowledge understand that the law is not just cold, hard law; it also contains the warmth and wisdom of life. In the book, the author avoids overly stereotypical character portrayals, instead meticulously crafting the image of Judge Huang, who upholds the warmth of the law, while also depicting a…

As someone who studied law and now can barely be considered to be working in the legal field, this book resonated with me in many ways, and I could also understand the difficulties faced by the protagonist and the court in some cases. Having followed the case up to this point, my impression of the "Hanhai" case has declined significantly compared to the previous cases.

The author could have easily omitted writing about how she almost didn't survive with Miss Ning.

As for Ning Xiaoxiao, I don't know why she appeared, what her purpose was, or how she progressed the plot. I just felt uncomfortable with her; she's either stupid or malicious.

I'd like to recommend the author, Officer Han. His writing leans towards realism, and he could learn a thing or two from it. He's won countless official awards and is reportedly a well-known figure in police circles. Okay, to be more blunt—I'm not speaking for anyone—I really dislike books that, while realistic, sound like reportage.

I've only just started writing, and I already feel like it's not good enough. Drunk driving gets such a light sentence; in my opinion, it should be the death penalty, and everyone who saw him get into the car after drinking should be sentenced to three years.

A novel is still a novel. We want to enjoy the story, not nitpicking the details of cases. In the highly publicized domestic case of "Brother Long," where the perpetrator even chased Brother Long until he fell and then stabbed him again, he was still ruled to have acted in self-defense. Why can't this case be judged as self-defense? Don't use the excuse of different eras.

The logic is flawed. In 2012, a small county with a population of just over 100,000 had law school graduates and doctoral candidates who had passed the bar exam joining the courts. That's problematic. The competition wasn't that fierce back then. Even 20 years ago, various regions frequently canceled judge positions, and nobody applied.