American Literary Hero 1905

I find that it is really difficult to write a literary novel. When your writing rhythm and writing style are not ideal, or the structure leans toward a novice, it becomes particularly unconvincing. It's a pity, I think the subject matter is okay.

I'm not afraid of robbery. I get happy when I hear about robbery. What kind of robbery is Saint-Denis? It was nothing more than a few shots fired at the tram stop. Blackwater Town is the only place to fight. There are tens of thousands of dollars in U. S. Dollars, guns and cannons, and I heard there is a Pinkerton.

Salted tofu is much more delicious than sweet tofu

Inexplicably, I wrote about Cthulhu. I didn't like this element very much. The rhythm was quite right at first, but then I suddenly switched to becoming a teacher.

It's an ordinary life but it's so cool. A very novel setting, relatively niche, and the writing is excellent, even better than many small masterpieces.

Is he the author who likes to write about Europe and the United States but often has bad eunuchs?

Come on, it's okay for now 😡

New books need data to be included in the new book list. I hope that readers who think it is good can click on your little fortune-making hand, read more and send some comments or monthly votes to support the author. Reviews, reading time, and monthly votes are all important data for the new book list.

The protagonist's dual identities are in great conflict. He is a bandit and a writer. The plot is very smooth and readable for readers. The author's writing is also very good. I hope that I will stick to it in future long-form writing. You must stick to your own writing style and don't be hit by criticism or abuse. Also pay attention to distinguishing good suggestions. Come on

To be honest, it's very good, but the pace is too slow. The protagonist has a transformation plan after more than 200,000 words.

I hope you can give me a lot of advice and thank you for your trouble

It's a pretty good work, I love it.

The writing is good, and the overall details are very elegant. It has a feeling of being eloquently told. You can also feel the author's intention when you see the books listed in the author's words. At least talking to some writers doesn't make me feel retarded and out of touch. But a small suggestion - of course, you can leave me alone. If you are going to play a supporting role, it is better to try not to overlap with the name of a famous writer, especially a writer whose name is not universal in the impression of East Asian readers (after all, it is a literary hero style, and what you are looking at is the interaction with historical writers). For example, Calvino suddenly appeared after I read it. To be honest, when this character appeared, I tried hard for a long time to keep reading, but it was always weird. The last part of the plot was skipped directly... Maybe because I am a believer of the writer Calvino, "If on a Winter Night, a Traveler..." The book had a great influence on me, including the concept of "lightness and heaviness" he proposed in his literary memo for the new millennium, which also influenced me for many years. Therefore, when the name "Calvino" appeared (especially when it appeared in the literary circle), I subconsciously connected it directly with the Cuban-born writer. Just like for many people, when mentioning Kerouac, Foucault, Hesse, Marquez, Woolf, etc., Only specific writers come to mind. Oh, and to be honest, I felt quite strange when I saw Jack London. After all, he left a deep impression on me historically. How to put it, first of all, he is actually deeply affected by plagiarism. His works such as "The Call of the Wild" and "Moon Face", which made him famous, as well as "Iron Shoe", "Love Life", etc. Have all been accused of plagiarism. Iron Shoe is the most controversial, and many of its contents are exactly the same as those written by others; Love of Life also lists a lot of similarities with others, and was exposed by the New York World in 1906. Including The Call of the Wild, the core has been ripped off as someone else's material. It's a bit like Mu Xin's so-called text regeneration, which is pretty disgusting anyway. Including his response to these things in history, he was quite shameless. The other thing is that he advocates the "yellow///disaster/theory", including writing about leprosy as China being the source of infection. He is a very typical racist. There is an article that specifically writes about using bacteria/shark/light to kill all Chinese people. If the author's background begins in 1905, then he already has a famous essay "Yellow///Disaster". This article is about his remote observation of Japan as a war correspondent a year or two ago, including the follow-up "White and Yellow" and "White and Yellow" in "Fishery Patrol Stories Collection" in the same year, 1905. "Yellow Handkerchief" is pretty much that. I won't describe it in detail. Later in 1909, he also wrote "Z Country Dog". In 1910, he wrote "Unprecedented Invasion" which is even more outrageous. You can search for the specific content. Anyway, he wrote a story about using bacteria to attack the species/race/large/picture/shark of Dongda University. In English, you can search for THE STRENGTH OF THE STRONG, which is about P60 pages I will post two random pages here, the first two are Academic Kids Academic Encyclopedia talks about the correlation between Jack London's plagiarism accusations and his racial tendencies, as well as the victim's confrontation with him and his defense; the third page is a random master's thesis from the University of North Carolina in the United States. It uses "The Call of the Wild" as a case study to specifically explore the originality of Jack London's works, plagiarism controversies, and the rationality of the use of materials in literary creation. Including the article about loving life, there must have been quite a fuss at the time, so I will simply post it here: humm Of course, the accusation of plagiarism against him has always been quite controversial. Some people think that it is an excessive reference to the material, while others think that it is blatant plagiarism. If you don't understand, you can refer to the bloody storm caused by the regeneration of Mu Xin's text. Anyway, I think if you want to write about him, you'd better be cautious and cautious. After all, his opinions are quite sensitive. That's all I can say. Of course, this is not a writing guide, just a personal opinion that may or may not be listened to. After all, beyond these problems, Jack London also had merits in other directions along the political spectrum. Looking forward to the follow-up development of this book and waiting for it to be put on your shelves.

Well written, but not attractive

Hello everyone, this is the new calligraphy reverberation I wrote (about the use of powers), welcome everyone

Do all the novels you open have multiple female protagonists?

What's wrong with you? 😭😭😭What is updated 12 days ago?

Gege's writing is great, but the updates are too slow. Hurry up and put it on the shelves. I'll order it all.