The Pure and Natural Dharma Corpse Legend of the Sun and the Moon with Additives

I suggest you re-watch Sun and Moon twice first 😐. This is not about whether the characters have been restored or not.

Gao Haoguang has nothing to worry about in Heishan Village. He will definitely destroy this corpse and be able to destroy it, because the existence of the corpse will not only harm a village, but will definitely threaten the survival of thousands of people. Not every corpse has the bottom line of Shangguan Xiao, Zhao Yan and others, so from the beginning to the end, Haoguang just thinks that these people are aiding the evil, and these people just exchange the lives of others and even innocent people for their own peace.

The boss of Wanye is dead, how can you, a Dharma corpse, change jobs?

Will you keep writing? I have been chasing the same mistake for many days, but I suddenly stopped writing in the middle of writing.

I hope readers can tell me where I made mistakes Thank you

There was a big problem in Heishan Village. Haoguang never acknowledged the sophistry of the people of Heishan Village from the beginning to the end. He tried out in a few words the idea that they planned to catch passers-by from outside and feed them three eyes. And because they knew the ferocity of the corpse, the idea that they would be no different from being domestic animals here would not be accepted by Haoguang at all.

My future writing method will not adopt a three-line parallel approach, and the future line will be abandoned to a certain extent, because due to the participation of the protagonist, the original future line no longer becomes real, and the future line experienced by the protagonist is the real future line. It will be explained in the text

The author cannot perfectly copy and deduce the personalities and essence of the various characters in the original work. If there is any discrepancy with the characters in the original work, I will try to get as close as possible from my perspective. If it is different from the reader's perspective, please feel free to make suggestions! I will consider accepting it as appropriate

If we really want to demonstrate Gao's justice, we should let Gao analyze the essence of this matter and its main contradictions, and deeply understand why they do this, why some people will actively resist when faced with this kind of thing, and some people will be passive and numb. Why is this? Is it jointly affected by economic, political, and cultural factors? Which factor accounts for the largest proportion, which is the main contradiction, and how to solve it after finding the main contradiction. Will the solution intensify the contradiction?

Moreover, his high status also makes it difficult for him to do these things. For the villagers, it is just like an expert saying that you don't work hard when a superior person is angry and doesn't convince the people.

I don't want high justice to be justice that is superior to others.

Readers are invited to give their own ideas. The author will listen carefully and selectively revise the article.

Um, why does Sanyan think that Haoguang can use Jiang Mingzi's talisman 100%, and now Haoguang can indeed use Jiang Mingzi's talisman 100%. No, buddy, Jiang Mingzi hasn't passed yet, Sanyan has self-mutilated, and he can still resist the next blow.

1. Cognitive level: The awakened "half-blind man" · Saw the disease and prescribed the wrong prescription: He clearly diagnosed the villagers' "self-enslavement" mental illness, but firmly believed that it could be cured by "the infusion of truth" alone. He saw the structure of "people eating people", but he couldn't see the economic, social and psychological imprint that had accumulated for thousands of years behind the structure. · The source of knowledge is single and pale: his awakening may come from the heretical classics he accidentally read, a travel experience, or the moral reflection on his identity as a "law seeker". This knowledge system gave him a critical weapon, but it also made him overestimate the power of ideas and underestimate the gravity of survival. · The mental prison of binary opposition: his world is a simple dichotomy of "awakening/numbness", "human/animal", and "resistance/survival". He could not understand the villagers' complicated survival philosophy mixed with cowardice and tenacity as they struggled to survive in the gray area. 2. Emotional level: The burning "lonely and angry man" · Anger comes first, lack of empathy: His anger is real and hot, but it is mixed with too much self-projection and moral superiority. He is angry that the villagers do not fight, and to some extent he is angry that his role as "savior" has been thwarted. He could not truly sympathize with the villagers' fear of "survival", which was millions of times heavier than the concept of "dignity" he brought. · Deep loneliness and the pain of not being understood: He feels that "everyone is drunk and I am alone". This loneliness will soon turn into spiritual obsessiveness and arrogance. He regarded the villagers' numbness as an insult to his ideal personality, thus intensifying his aggressiveness during his preaching. · Emotion-driven, not strategy-driven: His preaching is not a calm plan, but a catharsis of emotional congestion. Every self-deprecation from the villagers ("We are beasts") added fuel to his fire, making his comments more intense and unrealistic. 3. Behavioral pattern: The powerless "preacher" · A giant in words, a powerless person in action: He may have no specific action plan other than "talking". When the villagers ask, "What should we do? Can you kill monsters/fight the government?", His answer will become pale, and he may fall into the logic cycle of "you must be aware before you can act." · The communication method is completely ineffective: his preaching must be top-down and full of reprimands. They use words that are difficult for the villagers to understand (such as "dignity" and "freedom"), but they cannot talk to them in terms such as "pay less rent" and "live more lives". The more he talked, the farther away he became from the villagers. · Easily exploited or reduced to embellishment: the actual controllers of the village (squire, clan elders) may initially tolerate him, and even use his "sense of justice" to deal with internal dissidents or external threats. Once he touches his core interests, he will be easily isolated or expelled. He may end up being just "that weird-talking scholar/mage" that the villagers talk about after dinner. What AI said is that just being angry with someone without fighting will not change the economic system, the political system, or the cultural foundation. It is just being angry with someone without fighting, and is completely out of touch with the people

Gao Haoguang: A more radical left-leaning element (in the novel) Yang: A more moderate left-leaning element But the main color of personality will definitely not change, and there will always be people who are kind and righteous.

Come on, the author will update more. I've left my monthly pass for you. You must not stop updating? 😢

After rereading the Millennium Chapter, the sense of violation became even more severe. Gao Haoguang's attitude towards these villagers has always been indignant. He asked the village chief, "You are no different from domestic animals. Even if all the guilty people are pushed out, so what? In the end, the threat of the corpse will still be on everyone, and why there is no way to survive." By the way, how did you live without the Dharma Corpse? Haoguang knew that this Dharma Corpse had only arrived not long ago, and he was even more disgusted by Haoguang when he said he wanted to catch passers-by and feed them three eyes. It was these villagers who were speechless and unable to refute, and Haoguang originally believed that he had the ability to eliminate this Dharma Corpse