Invincible, but with the Wrong Art Style

Using attacks to achieve one's own goals without offering solutions is understandable if the other party is of questionable character, but it's detrimental to standing on moral high ground and condemning a good person as utterly despicable.

The story starts by reversing cause and effect, attributing all the evil deeds of supervillains to superheroes, and using its own twisted logic to suppress Spider-Man. How is this protagonist any different from someone who, while fighting monsters, incites others to believe that monsters were brought by Ultraman and that humanity would develop at a high speed if Ultraman didn't fight them?

Don't click on this... Seriously, the protagonist just finished criticizing Spider-Man, and then Spider-Man went into a trance and stopped doing anything. Then, right after, the protagonist gets shot in the street and would have died instantly if it weren't for some kind of cheat code. What is this? Is this dark humor? 😂

I've only read the first three chapters, and I'm already completely hooked. The protagonist reminds me of that character in the movies who, after saving someone, complains about not bringing breakfast because of some petty self-interest?

There was a leaky boat, and the water was about to sink it. Spider-Man transformed into several planks to plug the leak, but the water still slowly seeped out through the cracks. The protagonist shouted, "This only treats the symptoms, not the root cause! Quickly remove the wooden planks!" So the stick-wielder, persuaded by him, tore the wooden board apart and smashed it to pieces, then said to the protagonist, "Now what's your better method?" The protagonist was taken aback: "What better way?"

The idea behind the Spider-Man nested doll theory—that criminals become stronger to defeat Spider-Man because he's too powerful—is essentially a case of shooting the arrow first and then drawing the target.

I can only say that the daily dose of poison is incredibly valuable. The first thing I checked after clicking in was the book review section, and seeing only negative comments made me a little skeptical. Surely there must be some who liked it, right? I started reading the first chapter with a skeptical attitude, and almost didn't even finish it.

According to the author's theory, when law enforcement officers are frustrated by supervillains and find that law enforcement costs are rising, they will either change careers or upgrade their equipment to become stronger. These enhanced law enforcement forces, while unable to eliminate supervillains, can easily handle ordinary criminals.

The first chapter is somewhat humorous, suggesting that China's strong anti-drug efforts lead to more rampant drug traffickers in other regions, therefore Chinese anti-drug police are guilty.

While most free-to-play books are garbage, this one, with just over two hundred chapters, must have something special to garner such overwhelmingly negative reviews. Let me taste it.