My Time and Space Club

1. The author mentioned referencing the movie The Savior, but that book was a mess. The biggest reason is probably the conflict between the setting of the disaster world and the resources available. 2. The author is not as good as the author of that book. First of all, there are a lot of bad sentences and typos. Then the progress is too fast. There are not many disaster movies with names. If you have just a few chapters and there are three, then if you don't spend a lot of chapters and time to smooth out the problems in these three worlds, you won't be able to add new worlds. All the worlds will be a mess and you will have no time to write. Even though the author of that book became a eunuch, he still could not solve the disasters in various worlds. The end of all worlds is still on the way. 3. There is a big problem with the setting of the protagonist. The protagonist in that book cannot launch an army, so he can only rely on the governments of other worlds. Why don't you use your protagonist if you can launch an army? At least he should have his own bodyguards. 4. The protagonist's IQ is worrying. The world in 2012 has arranged an army for the protagonist. You go to the new world without a single soldier. Those mobs see you like a big fat sheep and you are uneducated. It is normal for them to come up and give you an arrow. Are they not afraid of death at all? 5. You don't have a charter for the crisis in the 2012 world and the biochemical world. If you write the novel according to the movie, you will directly destroy the umbrella base. The movie has already told you where their identity is. If you don't write according to the movie and the parallel world, you should not treat the protagonist like Alice as shown in the movie. Generally speaking, there are many problems, and the problems are huge. If I say it slowly, there are too many things that need to be adjusted. I suggest the author set up a group chat or forum mailbox, etc., So that everyone can find out the problems together. We respect the author's ideas, but we don't want a good idea to end up like this.

I don't understand why people from Resident Evil should be moved to the world of 2012. Shouldn't the army be sent over to wipe out the zombies and monsters here, and then transport supplies to help them resume production? You move people there, and they have to move back again in two years. And there is also the risk of infecting the world over there. What's the point of going back and forth like this?

If it were the 2012 movie world, ships would have been built in Tibet long ago in 2009. You wrote it as if the top brass didn't know the end of the world.

This book has potential, but one thing that makes people uncomfortable is that the protagonist self-destructs. To be honest, there is no shortage of careerists at home and abroad, and the protagonist is not the same kind as "them" in a sense. The current model is like a cooperation model, not a leadership model, and this is the most fatal point. You said that after signing the contract, others cannot harm the space-time base. Even if they cannot harm the protagonist, they are all autonomous and can be messed up and turned into traitors! They know 70% of your information, and then use the whole country to fight against you. The person you signed the contract with can't hurt you, but they just show off and commit suicide, and you are just a polished commander. In the end, even if the protagonist is fine, the world will be scrapped in a short time. People get technology from you, survive the crisis, and feel very comfortable. What should you do, what can you do? Afterwards, the state will definitely target you. As long as you dare to come again, they will never stop until they eat you to death.

Pig's Knuckle is not a racist negative review

The protagonist just self-destructed, which made me silent. The gift he gave himself at the beginning was a gift he received. It sounded like the protagonist was like a beggar who found gold, which was weird.

Today's readers like to watch some supporting characters with IQs. Of course, there are also some novices now, and Wen Shuang's articles also have a certain audience space Especially when it involves cooperation with institutions such as the entire world government, a government think tank, some of its behavioral decisions feel too low-level, but there are always some authors who write a kind of incomplete beauty To be honest, I feel that if I ask any AI, they will be slightly better than this one The most important thing is that After the epidemic is solved, you must first solve the problem of food, clothing, housing and transportation for one billion people. Let me just talk about it casually. For a family of three, you should at least get a house worth 30 million, and then your food problem. , Regarding this point, it's easy to write if you extend it casually For example, if the above measures are taken one by one, and it falls on everyone, it is more important than Mount Tai, and then write a split shot, with six or seven people, their reactions and so on (┯_┯)

The author has not read or finished Resident Evil and wrote it

1. Some people think that the beginning is very similar to another book, which is right, because there is a reference, and the 2012 movie is easier to write as the beginning. Of course, if you mind, I can change it to the disaster movie The Day After Tomorrow 2. Goldfinger refers to the mobile game Red Alert OL. If you are interested, you can play it 3. This book is not a salvation flow, but a space-time war flow, a world invasion. The protagonist is the invader, the movie parallel world is the auxiliary, the plot of the space-time war is still being conceived, and the experience is not enough. I am still trying, and I hope readers can give me some suggestions That's it. If you have any questions, you can ask them under this post, and I will reply when you see them (PS: Are there any other good disaster movies? Global catastrophic ones)

Isn't there a lot of water in your water world? So, is it possible to put the water from the water world into Resident Evil? Wouldn't land come out in this way? There aren't many people in Resident Evil anyway, so wouldn't this have solved the end of the world?

A running account, written for the sake of writing, without substantial expansion of the core. A straight line.

I don't understand that the first world and the third world are both water worlds. Why don't you quickly prepare materials to build a granary world? If you don't have mature technology for platform atomization cultivation, you will stick to artificial starch. Is it true that every so-called salvation book likes to stick to artificial starch? There is no need to spread the ready-made technology. Just stick to that thing and still refuse to look up at the stars. He would just open the map like crazy and after that he would shout that there was not enough food.

It's a pity. I originally wanted to come and take a look, but who knew I wouldn't write about it?

I have a bad feeling that it will wear out quickly and end badly 🤐

Did the author rewrite it? As far as laying railroad tracks, I'm pretty sure it's an article I've read before.

The author must be a holy mother. There are many people in the heavens and the world, and they must save Baipi. I am speechless.

There was a book about this before.

I heard it's similar to the movie "Savior". Please write more and get 18 monthly passes.

Are there any similar books about saving the world? This kind of world collision feels very interesting.