We Agreed to Make a Game, So What's This About Five Thousand Years of History?

First of all, I must commend the author for the overall plot and the elaborate praise; it's indeed well-written and engaging. However, does the author have some misunderstanding about game development? A game, simply put, is an amusement park built by the creator, where players go in and have a look around. However, building an amusement park takes time.

Are you sure you're writing games and not animation? 🤔

The reason real history can be presented is because it actually happened. If you put something like 800,000 to 100,000 damage in a game, it seems impossible. In a rational discussion, most people probably wouldn't accept such a storyline.

I'm speechless. The Three Kingdoms period hasn't even started yet, and you're already writing about other things. Do you even know what people want to see?

I feel like several of the books I've read, especially those with titles in this format, are similar to videos and have very poor gameplay. Moreover, many game developers struggle to empathize with game designers and connect with players, yet player reviews are often poor, making it seem like people only play the game to advance the story.

If the game isn't released by the time the CG is finished, wouldn't that be putting the cart before the horse?

Isn't the White Horse slogan "Where righteousness leads, life and death follow; Heaven is our witness, and the White Horse is our proof"? What the heck is this whole "unstoppable" thing?

It's almost chapter 20, and your first game still isn't out. In other novels about game development, they'd already be preparing for their second game.

Don't ever make this game; tell the readers only after the book is finished. The game is done, then the story ends.

Why is it all animation? Didn't you say you were making a game? The opening setup is a bit too long.