Southern Ming: This Emperor Is a Little Too Steady

For those who say that all feudal dynasties are the same, let them choose one of the Qing Dynasty, Ming Dynasty, Tang Dynasty, and Song Dynasty to be a native. I don't think they can choose the Qing Dynasty. Let it choose between the prosperous age and the last years of the dynasty, and see if it chooses the last years. Only modern countries have human rights, so let them go to the Middle East, Palestine, Ukraine, and become natives in countries like Haiti. Be honest and don't lie to yourself. Go to China, Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, France, Germany, and Argentina during World War I and World War II. That group of people would rather choose Argentina than China. Because Argentina was still a developed country at that time, even if you didn't choose Argentina, you would still choose the United States. No matter how bad the United States was, it still had the strongest economic strength at that time, including Roosevelt. After World War II, China will enter a period of rapid development. Don't always say the same thing everywhere. All the same, would you choose the Qing Dynasty? Would you choose to be a native of Hiroshima, Japan during World War II? You won't. Finally here, let's chat.

Why can't you read the history of Southern Ming Dynasty? Because you know that China will enter the darkest, most barbaric and most depraved two hundred years, and they are just struggling to their death. Why do you like modern history? Because you know that this is just the night before dawn, and the dawn of the country and the nation is ahead.

The more I watch, the more I hate Li Zicheng. He is really too stupid. He can rise up, burn, kill, and loot, but how can you be so good and stupid? ? ? I wish I could pull him out and whip him to death

The writing is very good. It looks like he was an emperor. He behaved exactly the same as I did when I was the emperor 🙂

Ask, if you have low blood pressure, what medications should you take to treat it? Answer, go read the ending of this book.

Why is no one watching? This book clearly demonstrates that politics is about personnel and identity. Moreover, conspiracy theories and calculations are relatively weakened, and everything is focused on solving problems.

The writing is quite good, and it avoids the common shortcomings of historical novels that everything revolves around the protagonist. The group portraits are all written with their own characteristics. The protagonist in many historical texts is like a leader on an inspection tour. He goes to one place and gives two sentences of instructions, then goes to the next place and gives two sentences of instructions. After saying a few words, everything is done. The protagonist of this book has just the right sense of presence. After formulating the general policy, it is the historical figures who are driving the changes in the world line.

This book is really the best late Ming Dynasty novel I have read this year. It does not engage in conspiracy theories, is not superficial, does not mess with technology, focuses on personnel matters, does not depress NPCs, and the writing style is not exaggerated. Next door, Daming 1627 is of the same type, but the author's corporate executive vibe is too strong, and it's hard to watch. This one is better.

Seeing Nanming I remembered that the game Late Ming Dynasty was released today It's amazing, there is no Manchu and Qing Dynasty 🤭🤭🤭

To be honest, from what I have read so far, the author's historical knowledge reserve, overall situation deduction and internal affairs description are all top-notch, and I dare say they are no worse than many famous historical writers. But the problem is that the writing is a bit dry. I always feel that it lacks the ups and downs of the novel and lacks the "human touch". I think this should be the reason why the current performance of this book is not particularly good. Those of us who like to read about the history of Nanming can happily read on, but many people who are not interested in this period of history may take a second look and leave. Take the current book 1627 on the list as an example. I think it is not as good as this book in terms of hard skills. However, if an ordinary reader may find that book a bit refreshing and immersive and read it, this one may be gone. I dare not teach the author to write a book, but I sincerely hope that the author can write better and better, and that good articles can be seen by more people. I think the author has great potential (sincerely)