
American Cop: Los Angeles Gunslinger, American Iaido
美警:洛城镖客,美式居合
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 2.6M Words
- Genre
- Urban
- Subgenre
- Urban Life
- Updated
- 3d ago
- English
- Request a translation
Synopsis
Stats
1kChapters
111Monthly votes
31.2kRecommendations
152.2kFans
12 ch/weekPace
More by this author
In booklists 1
Readers also read
Conquering America by Opening an Apocalypse Shelter
Hong Kong, 1978: A Tycoon Who Started by Growing Vegetables
Blazing Red, 1975: My Wife Wants Me to Take on a Whole Row of Them
Chinese Showbiz: Starting by Bonding with a Contract Beast
Reconstruction After the Plague
A Record of Survival as an American Cop: Winning Them Over with Virtue
America: Leveling Up by Collecting the Dead
The Top Immortal of the College Entrance Exam
A Pair of Living People
This American Cop Values His Life: American TV Universe Starts at Yellowstone
America: The Fast Chase, 1924
America: The Gearhead Detective
Reader comments 53
Google Translate






He keeps using his wife and children from his past life as an excuse for his scumbag behavior; it's utterly disgusting.
After finishing the book, I'm still just a lowly patrol officer. The biggest problem with this book is the lack of a main plot. Whether it's getting promoted or solving cases, there should at least be a goal, right? It's all about killing and sleeping from beginning to end; no wonder it didn't do well on the ratings.
Another book that American police officers can read.
Well written, the logic is relatively smooth so far, and there aren't any major flaws. The guns and the aesthetics regarding women are both quite normal so far. Thumbs up! (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧👍
The fight scenes were great, but the romance was really bad. Matthew was just a spitting image of a villain, even worse than the real Duan Yu. At least Duan Yu wasn't this pretentious or manipulative. 😰
Why did you write about Huang Xixiang, this ABC (American-born Chinese) lackey? He donated over 30 billion US dollars to the US to curry favor. If you're trying to ruin him, I have no problem with that. But if you're trying to save him, then I can only say it's extremely toxic.
Either eliminate the problem completely, leaving no future trouble, or don't even bother doing it. Why resort to killing the young and letting the older ones come after you? That's not the way to do it anymore. The new trend is to eliminate the root of the problem once and for all. Don't talk about lack of evidence. I don't believe a legislator cares about evidence.
Good books
The author's descriptions of several major scenes are truly cinematic, and the protagonist is genuinely decisive and ruthless, embodying the principle of "if you can't get in, you'll get out." He seizes any opportunity to act when threatened, without hesitation. What's even more remarkable is that it adds a fresh twist to the traditional system-based gameplay.
It's alright, but they keep bringing up things from their past lives. Once or twice is fine, but it gets annoying when they keep doing it.
It's unbelievable. A gunfight in a big city like Los Angeles killed 14 people, and not a single reporter came from beginning to end. A group of big shots came and slowly held a meeting to blacken up the incident and define its nature. The villain even tried to flatter him to death. What, does someone who's famous need to be a deputy director? This position will have to be re-elected in two years. Even the worst protagonist can easily switch jobs.
Like a terrible American movie, it started off somewhat interesting, but after it was released, it became utterly awful—the kind of movie you'd never watch again after seeing it once.