I Am a Liberal Arts Student, What Kind of Academic Master System Do I Need?

Damn it, a type I've never seen before! This is the first time I read a Xueba article other than mathematics and physics! I hope the author will think more and at least come to terms with it!

I feel that the economic theory of the protagonist written in big letters by the author is a bit interesting But at present, this concept is fiction after all, or does it exist in a small-scale paper? There are detailed descriptions in many places in urban literature. The more realistic the writing, the easier it is for people to feel immersed in it. To make this concept real and concrete, it feels difficult to write, and it is not only the author's writing skills that are tested. I have read more than ten chapters so far. As a passerby who does not understand economics, I said that the article is well written. Read it. But I am curious about how the economic theory and thesis will be expanded.

The author's imagination is still good, although some parts are not self-consistent and are a bit exaggerated, but it follows current events and is full of details. It can be considered a new theme, so I support it.

The essence of economics is that I teach you to make money, but I keep one hand, and then I take away 99% of the money you make, and let you continue to develop the rest.

I can't continue studying my major, alas.

According to the story told in this book, brands are IP-based. It seems that all consumers only look at the IP when purchasing products. In this kind of society, everyone must be rich. Only with money can they have a higher consumption concept. That is to say, there are no ordinary people at the bottom. Everyone is willing to buy at a premium for the story of the product, rather than buying for the practicality and cost-effectiveness of the product. So where does the money come from? Does everyone make money from creativity? Is it possible? There are always people who just don't have that talent, what should I do? Then there must be a society that supports these uncreative people, or there must be jobs for these people. And the state must control productivity. Otherwise, if you create stories but I don't produce them for you, where will you get the OEM? Factories in various industries must support personalized production. Otherwise, would they have to adjust their production lines every day? Who else develops new products? Therefore, society should use scientists as the bottom structure and the upper level of the pyramid, and ordinary people should be empowered by the products developed by scientists. Just like scientists develop computers, factories produce computers, and ordinary people add various stories and functions to computers. Will the small things mentioned in this book defeat the big ones? It's simply unrealistic. Big capital is big capital and you can't do it at all. Unless we enter the communist era, big capital has advantages. Big capital won't produce your story-telling brand and block you. Give me creativity to defeat capital and try 🤫 It's okay for you to do this in low-end industries. After all, any small factory can produce it. But in high-end industries, try it and see who can produce it for you. Just like a mobile phone chip, if you give the chip a story-telling brand, is it useful? Big capital won't allow you to produce, and what consumers need is practicality rather than how beautiful the story you tell is, what should you do? Storytelling is at most like a soft-text advertisement to increase exposure and make it easier for people to remember the brand. By the way, when there are more story-telling brands, the factory will become the local emperor, and you have to beg for OEM. Otherwise, why would they OEM for you? Huawei is so awesome and has a strong storyline, but what really makes Huawei awesome is scientific research. Only when the scientific research is awesome can there be room for storytelling as a brand, otherwise there will be no room for it. There is another situation, that is, why do the products I develop have to bear your brand? Only when there are too many products that are publicized and have no technical features can there be room for storytelling brands, because there are too many factories that can produce them. Otherwise, I can't think of why you don't build your own brand instead of using your storytelling brand? I develop a new product and OEM it for you? If the products developed by the state are publicly authorized and OEM, it is almost enough. Otherwise, which boss would be so generous? The state only controls the OEM production process, and the rest of the product design, research and development, etc. Are created by small companies themselves, which is more or less the same. For example, the state controls chip production, while chip design and so on are all done by small companies. Small companies must ensure that they have enough manpower, and there are many studios under large companies to provide creativity and select optimal product designs.

It's just a fantasy before you die of anger after being rejected😜

A theory like Ma Enmao will not be born in novels, which is also the key to the lack of hegemony in liberal arts. What science needs is answers, what liberal arts needs is process

These people in the introduction currently seem to be the products of god-making, and they are so awesome that they are so impressive.

Did you study economics in college? Have you ever attended college?

There is no mention of collapse later, this is the starting point for economic leaders. It's all settled if it doesn't collapse.

It's very fresh and novel. In this era of great changes, maybe it really is possible.

This is similar

This is another novel where the young plants are collected first. Now the author has many vests and can cut them quickly.

What's rare is that it's not a science and engineering book. The subject matter is quite novel, but the protagonist and heroine and the system settings are very flat, and the plot transitions are also very blunt. In the science and technology story, there is no specific description of the exciting points, the protagonist's progress and the impact of the results. In a few sentences, the paper is written. It is recommended that the author change the description of the protagonist, supporting actor, heroine, and mentor. Personal opinion, don't comment if you don't like it.

Although I can't understand it, it's really a cool article, but there are too few updates. You can read it.

This is only 380,000 words? Reading the latest chapter from the beginning in one breath feels like reading a million-word novel.

There are more and more categories of Xuebawen. The writing style is very good and the content is very new.

Subscribed to a chapter for whining purposes. The book is a good book, but I was too tired to read it. I couldn't understand a lot of the content, and I didn't want to read it over and over again, so I could only vaguely see it on the shelves. Subscribe to a chapter for a summary of support.

Regarding Jiang Rong's industrial theory, whether it is IP stories or sentiments, the core is that consumers consume according to their own preferences. It seems that the creator first thinks of an IP, but in fact the essence is still that consumers choose and pay for the one they like among a bunch of IPs. Moreover, this theory has a hidden premise, which is that with the revolutionary progress of machinery and the great abundance of productivity, humans are no longer the main provider of productivity. When the vast majority of people become detached and no longer engage in low-end labor, and do not need to care about the additional price of their hobbies, they can choose as they please. Only in games can this be achieved when all products are priced at the same price. As long as most people are still laborers, the industry will still be dominated by the market economy. For example, Xiaowo ceramic tiles may cost 200,000 yuan for ordinary decoration, while Xiaowo tiles cost 50,000 yuan. Only a very small number of rich people will buy them. It is a luxury product. Most people still have to look at the price to buy things. Your brand cannot become mainstream. It is still practical, and it is still a capital society.