Laughing Madly in Marvel Comics, I'm Becoming More and More Like the Joker

First of all, I didn't like this book. Secondly, objectively speaking, the writing style is good. Also, most book reviews miss the point. So let's talk, plant grass for lovers, and provide lightning protection for haters. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the writing style of this book. It cannot be said to be divine but it is definitely not shocking. The real "problem" is... The author is too extreme in style. To be precise, he is too extreme in "clown" style. Yes, after thinking about it for a while, I used this adjective, 'Joker', not the literal meaning, but the Gotham one. The most interesting and boring core of this book is: "As if written by the Gotham Joker himself", regardless of whether it is a simulation or the author's mental state, the result is that this book is a good example of "what would the author write if he was as calm and crazy as the Gotham Joker" "Autobiography?", The closest thing to this book are those strange books in the psychiatric genre, but the psychiatric genre sacrifices logic to greatly improve the laughter and contrast, but this book sacrifices the sense of pleasure, sacrifices the logic, sacrifices the laughter, sacrifices... Without sacrificing the contrast, just for the "extreme clown", this somewhat absolute "tendency" will almost definitely surprise that group of audiences, and will definitely make people who are interested in "logic" "Laughing and refreshing" has a lot of appeal among the audience, and it is a typical book for selective readers. I am an extremely omnivorous person, but I have extremely high requirements for logical rigor. This book has obvious sections where logic is sacrificed for the sake of the 'flavor'... So, I really don't like this book. However, I like to have these kinds of books, not the same ones. That's it, above.

Some literary youth suffer from excessive rhetoric and affectation, and are too immersed in their own emotions and imagination, ignoring the logic, rationality and resonance of the work with readers. Tell a story well first, and then worry about other things. Don't worry about things that are there or not.

The book is very good, but I don't know why I always feel that the interaction between the protagonist, Batman and the Joker is like that of a gay man. It's not that it's really written in a gay way, but it's just that kind of atmosphere. The book is still good.

I have been a bookworm for many years and have read countless pirated books. I would like to express my opinions here I have read 20 chapters so far. The logic is clear, the characters are consistent with the original work, it is not systematic, and it is not awkward, and the timing is not common. The language is mature, and the author's thoughts are not interfered with. If you stick to it, it is a good product.

The emotions are well rendered and the details are in place, but it is too gay, which makes me unable to get involved at all 1. The author writes women's dialogues in the same way as men's dialogues. If you ignore the name in the first chapter, you can't even tell who the protagonist is 2. In terms of address, the doctor said to the protagonist, I am not your boyfriend and I will not take care of you. Here is What are parents or relatives and friends? This description is too niche 3. All the characters the protagonist meets are basically not hostile. Even important characters are friendly to the level of affection, and the expression is similar to sympathy. This is not the heroine. If the heroine is estimated to be more direct, it means everyone loves me 4. The author's writing The technique is very delicate, but such delicateness is rare in male channels. It can basically take care of touch, vision, hearing, heart, etc. It is too rare, buddy. It should be considered rare even in female channels. The delicate description creates strong psychological pressure and creates an emotion, similar to that the whole world is against me, everyone will misunderstand me, and no one can understand me. I want to fight... Brother, male videos basically don't write novels like this. Male videos are generally more direct in their effects and express their feelings directly. The female videos I have seen are not like this. They will be more intense and dramatic emotionally. You are right in the middle, neither up nor down, hesitant, unable to express emotions directly, and also reveals a slight sense of bitterness.

The protagonist is Batman. Batman is the Joker.

It's better to draw a fan 🤣

How should I put it? I am a little too obsessed with the clown's mental state. I feel that the author will always not think about the reasonableness and smoothness of the development of the story when he can't continue writing. Instead, he will put the cart before the horse and think about what the "clown" would think, and then write a thesis about the clown instead of a novel. The novel serves the plot from beginning to end, but this novel puts the importance of the characters above the story, which is a bit too self-pleasant. In general, everyone comes here to make dumplings made with vinegar, but there is only vinegar left. The author pours tons of vinegar on himself, without caring about the life or death of the readers. As an old man who has been reading for 20 years, I would like to give you a suggestion. The kernel is called the kernel when it is not visible to others. For example, a peach can grow plump and juicy because of the kernel, but if only the kernel is left, it can only be thrown into the trash can.

The image of the protagonist is the latest, but I feel like Lucian has always been confused. {"TopicId":"1135038621381754880","TopicName":"Laughing at American Comics, I am becoming more and more like a clown"}

How should I put it? The wild laughter written by the author is not like a wild laugh at all. Anyway, I feel that he is a person who is leaning towards a clown. He is neither a bat nor a wild laugh. He is a bit clown but not much.