Tony Stark of the Myriad Worlds

The writing is too boring. Although the protagonist is a shithead, the author has no subjective initiative at all in writing. I don't think the shithead will honestly follow the flow of the game, so it is better to write the protagonist as an ordinary person.

This kind of introduction, I don't even want to read it for free

He who stabs others in the face forgets in the middle and forgets in the end

The author is quite brave, but it is too difficult to use Tony, a popular character with distinctive characteristics and a full-bodied character in the movie, as the protagonist. This is also the reason why many people are used to writing about time travel, and just blame the OOC reasons on substitutions.

I saw Chapter 8 of Iron Man 2. I don't know why, but I always feel that the taste of this chapter has changed a bit. The protagonist will often smile and look at everyone with a "joking" look in his eyes, looking at strangers and gods. Thor is written like a clown and Ancient One is written like a servant. Their judgments on events are becoming more and more arbitrary. I think you are a god. You are a god. Why? Because the names are similar, it's hard to convince readers, and it feels like the writing is becoming more and more deliberate and mindless, which was not the case at the beginning

If you have any opinions, you can mention them here 🙂 If the writing is not good, and which world Tony can travel to, you can mention it here 😌

The writing is too boring. If the author has writing experience, this book will be well written and it will be a very good book about astronomy. Unfortunately, the author is not strong enough and does not need to follow the rules. As for Iron Man, every world must come up with some technology that shocks the world. Such pretentiousness is popular everywhere.

It can allow Tony to experience some science fiction worlds, which will help him relieve his anxiety, collect technology he doesn't understand, and obtain equipment that is beyond his time.

Evaluation: This is a typical online novel, that is, nonsense literature. It seems to talk a lot, but most of it is useless content. The novelty of the setting will soon be worn away by the meaningless content.

After reading the comments, you will know that this is the gap between an ordinary person and a genius. Using an ordinary person's cognition to describe the thinking of a genius, do you think the world in the eyes of a primary school student is the same as the world in the eyes of a scientific research boss? When it comes to home, it means that the author's cognition and imagination are insufficient, and his morality is not up to par.