The Keeper of the Forbidden Books in the Wizarding World

What kind of things are the two raised? When they cause trouble, the protagonist will settle it, and when they get angry, they run away from home and never interact with each other until they die. Is this what they call flesh and blood?

The overall writing style is quite good, but the character creation and plot design are a bit too deliberate. Many times the plot is turned around and ignored in order to create conflicts, resulting in the protagonist's personality being very torn and lacking in highlights. However, the design of the group portraits is okay, and most of the supporting characters have their own stories. To be honest, I saw that Henry kept reading the rest of the book. Henry's story has always been my favorite, but the rest of it turned out to be so simple. (Although it is said that he has melted into the ship, he cannot speak or move, so what is the difference between being dead) His hole has not even been filled, and the "justice" of the previous pirates has not been reflected at all. The final plot of melting the ship might as well have been designed to integrate the ghost ship, and then give me a wave of reinforcements for the navigator, and then start the extraordinary era of great navigation. As a result, all the children were sacrificed and turned into mermaids. My brother Henry still didn't survive and lost most of his desire to continue reading.

The cheat part was a little awkward at the beginning. I thought it would be a traditional cheating upgrade. At that time, I positioned it as the style of the evil god's lackey, pretending to be sexy or something. As a result, the plot unexpectedly unfolded. Although the outline style is very simple, the punctuation and segmentation are basically no problem. The plot mainly relies on character dialogue and is relatively consistent with the character design. There are not many detailed descriptions but the general atmosphere setting effect is basically no problem. If you are patient and willing to watch the story without deliberately pursuing the ups and downs of the plot experience, it should be good. At least it has its own characteristics while ensuring the quality.

It is more like a script than a novel, and the plot direction is more like a performance drama, with reasonable misunderstandings, tragic fate, deep foreshadowing, and excellent writing. As for the protagonist. . . . Except for the librarian NPC, the rest are all protagonists

I have read more than twenty chapters, and the more I read, the more I feel something is wrong. The story is pretty good, and I also like the group portraits, but your descriptions are too plain, and it feels like reading a drug manual. There are always characters in group portraits that readers can take on. The characters should be more flesh-and-blood, but so far they are very weak. To be honest, I think the descriptions of characters in history books are more vivid than this, such as Spring and Autumn and Three Kingdoms

In fact, it's not bad. I've seen a plug-in that is almost exactly the same, but I have a small suggestion, that is, the second one is much longer than the first one. The narrative length difference between each story should not be too big, unless the length is very important. Also, don't make the distinction between good and evil too clear. This is not the real world. Isn't the great pirate lord who dominates the world also a very unique character? Then... Is it because there are too few descriptions of the forbidden book's abilities? There are just a few techniques for one enchantment, such as doubling, invisibility, hypnosis, withering, blasting, freezing, acceleration, range enhancement, personification, elemental enchantment, multiple enchantments, physical enchantments, and many other development directions. As a result, it took a long time to write. Henry gained extraordinary power and didn't see much of the impression of his life. His survival to this day relies on the accumulation of his previous pirate days and library days. Then I hope the author can write about the colors of another world and the colorfulness of plug-ins. Other worlds are a very general concept. They can include papal countries that rely on faith, commercial kingdoms that focus on trade, weird countries whose land is built on monsters or ruins, alien countries or tribal clusters whose residents are various alien races, such as lizardmen, tauren, frogmen, etc., Countries whose residents are all dead or who rely on exploring ruins to survive, and so on. Special lands, wonderful animals and plants, folk customs that are different from the real world, various weird natural disasters or ancient ruins, I hope the author can write a lifelike alien world, not just the most traditional alien worlds such as Western alien worlds, the Middle Ages, knights and magic, nobles and commoners, humans and elves. Then there is the colorfulness of the plug-ins. Every book has a point that attracts readers, and the fun of the plug-ins occupies a large proportion. The synthesis plug-in gives you the excitement of not knowing what the next product will be, the creation plug-in does not know what the next realm is, and the library plug-in is expected to have a large part in the diversity of banned books and other functions of the library. Regardless of functions, the diversity of banned books is very important. For example, if synthetic plug-ins and panel plug-ins have not been updated for a long time, they may arouse readers' opinions. There are good and bad aspects.

Behind the scenes of group portraits, to put it bluntly, it is to create a few heroic and tragic characters and add the protagonist to wipe the butt.

It seems to me that curses and blessings are not completely opposite things. For example: 1. Human cells can only divide about 50 times, which is why people age and die. If human cells have no limit on the number of divisions, theoretically, people can live forever. So if a person's cells can divide without limit, is this considered a blessing? But is this cancer a blessing or a curse? 2. One person allows another person to gain eternal life. Is this a blessing or a curse? Then it also gave him great power. Is this a blessing or a curse? Then this person is Dracula. God cursed him with immortality, but let him live by sucking blood; 3. If you gain immortality, then this immortality is the immortality of consciousness. Your body will age, die and decay normally, and your consciousness cannot leave your body. Is this eternal life a blessing or a curse? 4. Is it a blessing or a curse to turn a person who will die in the next second into a vampire and live forever? 5. Let a corpse regain consciousness and the body will not decay. Is it a blessing or a curse? 6. Let a dwarf grow taller, but this growth is unlimited. Is it a blessing or a curse?

Let me draw the conclusion first: I rarely read group portrait articles, so the scope of comparison is limited. So far, the character creation and group portrait levels, as well as the interweaving of each perspective, are very good. After reading it, my thought was that it would be great if Cui Shu was one-tenth as good as the author in this regard. The plot of the first volume has not yet unfolded, and it is all supported by character creation. The plot becomes more and more exciting later on. After boasting, let's talk about the shortcomings: 1. The perspective switches too frequently. If you want to skip the timeline or another line intersects with this line, then there is nothing wrong with changing the perspective. However, some personal lines are connected at all, and jumping to temporarily irrelevant lines is a bit excessive. This is not how to whet your appetite. 2. The image of the protagonist is not clear. After reading three hundred chapters, I still don't have a deep understanding of the protagonist's character and so on. Many opportunities to shape the protagonist were cleverly resolved, including but not limited to outsourcing to Anne, which resulted in the protagonist's lack of communication with Chris. Another example is that Henry never saw the protagonist again after he left (although he arrived later, there was no real conversation). In fact, Natalie could have asked the knight to pass the news to the protagonist, and then the protagonist would not have time to rush on, but only saw Henry for the last time, and so on. The protagonist lacks a sense of depth in the plot, and it is completely impossible to tell what his attitude and concepts are towards what is happening in the world. The NPC feeling is too heavy. 3. The problem of supporting role creation. I must say that although most readers dislike Chris, Chris's portrayal is indeed the most interesting one I have seen so far. Although extreme, he has his own philosophy. He may be bad, but I can't fault him on a characterization level. Brianna's shaping is just a beginning, no evaluation. It is interesting for Ao Lei to change her identity and move around in various environments, and she has a strong subjective initiative. The plot line of the killer who is also born with supernatural powers is much less enjoyable. Becas is really just cannon fodder, and the more I look at it, the more I feel that he went offline so early simply because of the fact that no matter who in the Kexi family has him following him, they will never have such a rough life. Natalie, the tough-to-kill king, has a plot line that is not boring, and can even be said to be interesting. She is at the ceiling level among non-borrowers, but she is also too twists and turns. It feels like two unexpected accidents can happen just by farting when she goes out. It is a bit poor to follow up. Apart from anything else, it was a bit too smart to almost kill the bandits before being captured by the Unsworn Knights. Although she has always been impulsive, there is a difference between being impulsive in her teens and being impulsive in her thirties. Henry, in order to take him offline, he successfully destroyed the image of the dragon knight (they kindly abided by the agreement and let you go, but on the spot they felt that they were hypocritical, and when they surrounded them, they still went up to hit them with hatred, right? Who is the knight after all). Although the loyal dog also plotted against Henry, at least his respect for Henry and his wonderful trust in sympathy can be seen. As for the dragon knight, I just want to give him two punches. Henry's plot and battle scenes are very enjoyable to watch, but the shaping level is very inconsistent... He is invincible even if he has not completed any of his life goals. So let me ask you, where is the justice of pirates? Kathy, I don't comment. It's a script with the same protagonist, but the borrower is not destined to be extraordinary. He is even suppressed by the author. He doesn't even have outstanding other abilities. It's hard to have too many expectations for this person's future plot. Annie and Laura, their respective plots are actually pretty good, but when they meet, they always give me the feeling that the author is a white river fish (it's the kind of two-dimensional flavor of "girls are fragrant, soft, pure and beautiful". To be honest, that kind of pure sticking without effective communication hurts the shaping). Even if you really want to write about pure sisters or gl in a serious way, this is not the way to write it... Of course, it is said that it is a single-player plot, but it is not very good. Anne has a plot, which is really recommended, and Laura is really a bit fake. This person's character gave me a sense of fascination. I felt that, except for the protagonist and Anne, the more people valued her, the more indifferent she became. To be honest, I felt a bit inhumane when I saw the various indifferent ways she showed towards Luo Luoti, a person who was about to die but cared about her heart and soul. I have been able to raise Laura for several years and still be like this. I think the protagonist is quite pseudo-human... Think of this first, I will add more later.

Let me tell you, have you ever felt this way: Recently, Qidian novels are like a pool of stagnant water, with no sense of innovation. There are some short-lived novels with new themes, but they always end with eunuchs. Although the novel without eunuchs is finished, the plot is rigid or boring.

The setting is quite interesting, but unfortunately judging from the performance in the first chapter, the library does not have that ancient and transcendent feeling. Even the setting that the protagonist only lives forever in the library is afraid that the natives outside will know about it, which feels very cheap. If the library is invincible, the library is invincible. For Destiny's Child, the books in the library are more of a help in times of need rather than the icing on the cake.

This can't all end in tragedy from now on, right?

Often when I watch it, before I understand what is happening on the plateau, the perspective switches to the sea, then to the witch, then to the protagonist's adopted daughter killing someone, then back to the book, then to the plateau and the sea, and then to the Heraldry Academy. The perspective changes a bit too fast. I hope the pace can be slowed down a little. At least I can finish a plot from one perspective before switching to the next perspective.

I don't know what the data the author saw in the background is, but after reading more than 200 chapters, Anne's plot is getting more and more boring. Her character is not a borrower. She fails to be strongly bound to the borrower Lola + the story binds the aristocrat + away from the protagonist, resulting in the plot becoming more and more useless.

This is not a novel. . . It's ordinary, no twists and turns, no climax. . .

Facial makeup is also a kind of skill. So many facial masks are no longer simple stereotypes, but people who have really worked hard in this area. And the development of events is very reasonable. The only flaw is that the male protagonist does not have the spirit of a time traveler and the calmness of an immortal. The flaws are not concealed, and the online novel can score 7.5 Out of 10.

What does this book say? Are immortal people just wasting time? It feels weird!

The subject matter is very good, but the author's writing style is not good enough. It feels a little different. It doesn't have the feeling of an epic of time, and the emotional expression is even worse.

Behind the scenes, there are a lot of female supporting characters,,, no wonder the popularity is low,

I can say that the setting is okay and the writing is good, but I really can't watch it.

The plot and characterization have gotten better after the first character. I wonder if the author could review the draft more. There are so many typos that are so difficult to correct.

After reading the fifth volume, I have some feelings. This novel is really good. The storyline, conception, character description and advancement, etc., The interweaving of various characters in the story, the creation of focal points and conflicts, and the progress of different characters to promote the progress of the main line. It is quite good. The whole world is brought to life, rather than just a background board, which is great. But the shortcomings are also very obvious. Although it is a group portrait article, it is too fragmented. If you don't read it in one breath, you will easily give up if you follow it. This is also the main shortcoming of this book. Now there are more than ten lines unfolding at the same time without distinction. This writing method is very problematic. Even group portraits have priorities and give and take. If they are all done in this way, it is not worth the loss; each character has a chapter, how to balance it? This is a novel. If almost every character does not give up, then at least one paragraph of the story should be used to describe one or two things and then switch perspectives, or use other methods such as flashbacks, interjections, narration by other characters, etc., Instead of frequently breaking it into scattered chapters.

It's a really good group portrait, the characters are well established, the villain's intelligence is normal, and there are many twists and turns. The deus ex machina was not too stiff and made sense, and it was great when the foreshadowing was put away. There are also problems. The biggest one is that the perspective switching is too hard. Maybe this is an inevitable part of group portrait writing. As there are more and more characters, multi-threads are constantly switching, and it will be a bit uncomfortable to read. But this has no impact on the overall plot. It's just that when cutting the plot, you need to stop and think about where the character's plot was before (it may have been disconnected three chapters ago). Other problems, such as some characters being unlikable and the readability of character dialogues needing to be improved, are all smaller problems. I have just read the third volume, and I have the above impressions. If it can maintain its current level in the future, it will be called a masterpiece.

Come on, author, I'll support you by reading other people's books. I've given you the monthly pass and ordered all the books. Give this legendary story and characters a legendary ending!

Author, you don't want a eunuch anymore, do you? ! ! It's been a while since I've updated!

This is the best group portrait article I have seen recently. When I read it, it even reminded me of "The Wine of Eternal Life". I stayed up late to watch half of it. This book is not only able to connect the threads of various characters together, but even each character has distinct characteristics. Until I saw Henry being killed by the Dragon Knight, and then confronting Cathy later. I really want to ask the author how he shaped the dragon knight? If he is a truly upright knight, what motivation does the author have for letting the dragon knight return to secretly attack and kill Henry after Henry abides by his agreement and lets him go? What qualifications did he have in front of Cathy to say that killing Henry was not evil? You must know that Henry had every chance to kill him when he helped the loyal dog give him the status of knight. But Henry didn't. He kept his promise and kept the agreement, but what about the dragon knight? It's not that I can't accept Henry's death. What I can't accept is dying in such a situation. Even if you jump into the sea to save Natalie and die, it's better than destroying the dragon knight's creation and dying in a despicable sneak attack.