You, a Forensic Doctor, Are Better Than a Criminal Police Officer!

The first case had too many bugs The author seems to have cited a bunch of books and theories to give people a very professional look, but the problem lies in the most basic logic. First of all, there are two methods of hanging upside down and hanging. The anatomical results are actually completely different. In addition, the marks of strangulation after death and before death are also easy to detect. At first, I thought it was strangulation first and then hanging, so I did not talk about the problem of strangulation marks after death. Of course, strangulation first and then hanging can also be detected. This will not be mentioned for now. The most terrible thing is, At the end, there was a sentence that the deceased might have scratched the murderer. This was too outrageous. There was no mention of whether there was any residue on the deceased's nails. The last sentence was that the deceased might have scratched the murderer. Check whether there were any scabs on the murderer's body. Even at the end of the interrogation, it was not a DNA test because the author still did not mention the nail residue. Instead, he said that the position of the scratch was unreasonable. I guess only the deceased could have caught this position. Then the murderer confessed. To be honest, the author might as well have put the background It is set in ancient times, or simply said that the parallel world does not have modern professional instruments and forensic knowledge, but as soon as I thought about it, it is not possible. It is still the same problem, fingernail residues. Even in the ancient setting, an autopsy found that there was flesh tissue in the nails of the deceased, and there were no wounds on the body of the deceased. It cannot be concluded that it was a suicide. Even patching it up and saying that the murderer trimmed the nails of the deceased may not work. There is still something wrong with the logic from the beginning. While talking about how professional Master Wu is and how powerful the protagonist is, it is biased. Both of them ignored the key part of the partial nail. I even felt that two dissections were redundant. There was no need to dissect and dissect twice. In short, it felt like someone saw a refrigerator open and there was no air conditioning. Then he took the manual and the principle of the refrigerator and analyzed it there, and finally dismantled the refrigerator. In fact, the refrigerator was not plugged in at the beginning. After disassembly, he reinstalled it and plugged in the wires. He found that the refrigerator could cool down normally, and thought he had repaired a broken refrigerator.

I just read it and have read several criminal investigation novels. I know that people who hang themselves will have Yoshikawa lines, which are scratches on the neck caused by subconsciously tearing the rope around the neck with fingers. At the same time, there will be blood stains in the fingernails. Then the 30-year-old detective in the article doesn't understand, nor does the forensic doctor, and it seems that the protagonist doesn't understand either. It's hard to say whether the author understands it - no one mentioned this. There was no Yoshikawa line on the neck, and there were bloodstains in the fingernails, but the forensic doctor ignored them. Before he died, the deceased left scratch marks on the legs of three prisoners at the same time... The police went to find the leader in charge to judge the superiority. It was okay to commit suicide. If it was a homicide like me, which was not guaranteed, the police would almost treat it as suicide. If the first two cases are not the protagonists, they are all unjust cases, and the other police officers are all fucking trash? The first one was originally planned by the police as a suicide, but the protagonist turned out to be a homicide. Just the case of the deceased was awarded third-class merit? ? The police will also rule the second case as suicide. The protagonist came out to deal with it again, but the result was another collective second-class merit? ? ? Would you like to take a look at what you are writing? ?

I couldn't stand the first case. The task force said it was suicide, but the protagonist objected and said it was homicide. The three doubts discovered by the protagonist do not require a forensic doctor. Any veteran detective with some experience can find out that this is a forced intelligence. Later it was said that the girl had scratched the murderer before she died. What about the skin flakes during the autopsy? Not to mention it can be dealt with cleanly. If it can be dealt with cleanly, then the murderer is a professional. And the processing process will also leave traces. There was also the interrogation of three people, a group of amateurs. With this interrogation method, I don't know whether the suspects can get in, but the interrogating police will definitely get in.

Whether it was suicide by hanging, not to mention the forensic examiner, even the veteran criminal police can tell. In the end, you are a fool.

Let me just talk about the first case. Wouldn't the first autopsy examine the nails of the deceased? Author, you want to highlight the protagonist and not make others smarter.

In the first case, the pretense was too much, and it was not done yet. The three doubts you raised can only be counted as two, and the last one is just speculation. The first two are too simple. Any other forensic doctor can see it. You are simply rubbing the previous forensic doctor's IQ on the ground.

You are so innocent throughout the whole process, one case after another. The security in Jiangcheng is too bad. I have read dozens of chapters and I haven't seen the male protagonist's family background. To be honest, with the frequency of crimes, the chance of sudden death among gays is several times higher than that of their counterparts 😂

Except for the protagonist, everyone is mentally retarded. The obvious loopholes in the first case were all revealed, but the police turned a blind eye? This is the first time I have seen such a mentally retarded novel.

Cases must be investigated and doubts must be investigated, it's not just talk. From your writing, I think you should know a little bit about hospitals, but you don't know anything about the responsibilities of the public security system. It is very common to suppress newcomers, but in the public security system, first of all, forensic reports are only for reference. Secondly, in the public security system, it is impossible for graduates from the capital to be picked up by the captain in person, so there is no such suppressive behavior in the public security system.

It can be seen from the first case that the author's professionalism is not very strong, resulting in people other than the deceased either abstracting or depressing. Instead of forcibly depressing him, it is better to send him to a place where he has already been depressed or where there is no modern forensic medicine 😥

Many people have talked about the issue of the first case, but I won't go into it. I won't talk about the second case itself. It's funny just to start with which police station was rated as the safest police station. Twenty thefts occurred in three months, including three burglaries. How can this area be the safest? Anyway, where I live there aren't that many thefts and I haven't heard of any awards. Also, in this candidate area for the safest police station, to catch a habitual thief, the police station director would have to hold a gun, and there would be two policemen holding explosion-proof shields next to him. I think catching a murderer is about the same, right? Such a safe police station is really chilling!

From the beginning, except for the protagonist, everyone else is mentally retarded. Then out of nowhere, a senior sister brought out her boss-level cousin to help. Hilarious

Isn't it necessary for family members to sign their consent for an autopsy? Don't family members need to be present? Do you think it's dissecting a rabbit?

I just finished reading Chapter 14 and I really can't stand it The police don't pay attention to the murder case at all The policewoman praises it so much that it's uncomfortable Why even the old forensic doctor also praises it All kinds of forced intelligence reduction just to highlight the protagonist The golden medal is wasted.

The author has no common sense at all, and is definitely not engaged in similar work. He may not have even read a few criminal investigation novels.

The first case cannot be justified

The writing is too plain. The protagonist, as a newly graduated forensic doctor, directly made a conclusion based on his own subjective speculation before the body was dissected and tested. Who do you think you are, the Eight Tigers of Criminal Investigation? And a criminal police captain and an old forensic doctor can suffocate a person who was hung upside down. The case was judged as a suicide and they were written as idiots and blind men. A female student weighing 100 kilograms was hung upside down for a long time and died of suffocation. Is there no trace on the legs? The forensic autopsy did not look at the residue between the fingers. This old forensic doctor is so idiotic.

Suspended by the ankle to the point of suffocation? Are you sure the medical examiner who did the first autopsy was not blind? Wear a belt and there are scars on your waist, but your ankles won't rot?

The biggest poisonous point of this book appears at the beginning. The author of forensic anatomy actually writes about outsourcing. One of the most important tasks of a forensic doctor is anatomy. If it is outsourced, why do we need a forensic doctor? Even a layman like me, or a layman who has watched some criminal investigation dramas, knows that forensic doctors rely on dissecting corpses to find clues. The clues found by the forensic doctor during the autopsy are given to the police, who then combine the clues found by the police with the clues given by the forensic doctor to identify the suspect and then arrest him. If you outsource it to a third party, why do you need a forensic doctor? If the third party is professional, why do you need a forensic doctor? Why don't you directly recruit a third party? If the third party is unprofessional and all the clues are destroyed, the dissection will be of no use.

Dear readers, thank you very much for your continued support. Due to the changes in the starting point, we attach great importance to the 24-hour subscription number of the latest chapters. I beg you to subscribe to the latest chapters in time. Your support is the biggest motivation for me to write a book. Thank you in advance!

It was fine in the front. How can the teammates set off the protagonist if they are not stupid? Classic and refreshing articles are not unacceptable But then came again. The classic unscrupulous media reported out of context. In fact, let alone published it, even if it was interviewed, the secretary and director had to explain it that day. We really don't have discipline. We can add fuel and jealousy to ordinary incidents, and we can only publish the report when it comes to criminal matters.

The description of criminal investigation in the book is too unprofessional, and this is really visible to the naked eye. This can also be seen from the rewards. With more than two million words, the highest level helmsman can read but cannot read deeply.

A very good book, keep it up. A monthly pass is given.

What do the police in this article do? Do they only work as forensic scientists? Is hanging one so easy to disguise... And the character of that senior sister is too earthy?

Forensic reasoning is very professional. Please update the author steadily and look forward to better...

Can the oil stains on the dagger and steel bars still be detected after 3 months in the open air? ?

After chapter 597, it will be 600 directly.

5 Votes for you, more! ! ! !

I don't know if other people have noticed this first-class and second-class skills. It feels too easy.

The author's serial number for the latest chapter is wrong, it should be chapter 501