Westminster Bank

Have you ever seen a dragon? Some things are scribbled and taken for granted.

When did it become a standard gambit to have a girl who would do anything if she was short of money? You see, each one is more disgusting than the other, and they are all labeled as studio texts.

This book is really incomprehensible. Many places cannot be connected together. There is no harmonious connection between cause and effect. The charges were laid casually without any review. The police co-authored the book for free, right? In the end, it is a frame-up, but there must be a cause and effect. Just for the sake of effect (making readers unexpected), I just write it blindly and have nothing to say. 😐 I saw the fog and traveled through another world. I could write a lot about the content before this, and I could tell the whole story clearly. But in order to create a sense of tension and fate, I just wrote it blindly and very compactly. A lot of things are summarized in just a few chapters, which makes people feel that the story is hazy. The gray lines that were originally buried can make people think about it, such as the letter Alice sent him? The Knights' fault? A series of subsequent injustices? It feels like the rhythm is just for the sake of rhythm. It's really disgusting and makes people feel like they don't want to discuss it at all. I didn't even look at the subsequent map changes. I couldn't stay on the original map and haven't written a few chapters yet. I originally wanted to pursue it. The setting is really good, and the character of the protagonist is also very likable. It is really a clean book on the Internet. However, when I heard about it, the author has written two books. There is nothing to say, and the updates are irregular. Such a big world view and setting, I have to figure it out and consider it carefully. This kind of attitude directly leads to negative reviews. It was originally expected to be platinum, but now I don't know if it can be ended properly. 😐A greedy person swallows an elephant

Open the creditor's door. The bank is the creditor. The evil dragon is the debtor. The introduction is a bit grammatical.

Although the author is obviously very excited about writing, there is a section in the middle that is very confusing. But if you continue writing like this, I will unilaterally designate you as the new "Dragon"

I've read five chapters, and it hasn't explained anything about the worldview. Are you letting the readers guess on their own?

What are the first few chapters about? Why is it that a bank clerk made a contract with a dragon, suddenly three corpses appeared, was imprisoned, and escaped from prison?

I have read the author's previous works, and he has strong writing skills and talent. The disadvantage is that the knowledge reserve is not high. Don't expect to be able to write an engaging worldview and outline based on real history and politics. A bit like Jiangnan, Fengyue

The overall plot seems to have been sorted out, but the author seems to be immersed in the creation and indulge in obscenity day and night. If you can accept this unclear way of writing details and the habit of digging holes casually, it will be quite interesting. It tests the compatibility between the author and the reader.

Non-stop, overwhelming, psychedelic and colorful, the biggest advantage of attracting readers is also the biggest disadvantage.