If There Are No Resources in the Last Days, Wouldn't It Be Better If I Opened a Supermarket?

It's just that the protagonist's character and way of handling things are not very neat, which makes people very unhappy, and leaves a lot of hidden dangers. Troubled times test people's hearts and seek their own death. Personal opinion, for reference only

Follow-up reading refers to the number of people who read the latest chapter within 24 hours, which is related to recommendation. Thank you to the new author.

Defeated after three chapters, the IQs of the protagonist and supporting characters are worrying, but their upper limit is the upper limit of the author's IQ. You can't force it, bye.

First, what is missing in the Ice Doomsday? Food and water? In fact, there is a lack of food and fuel. Water can melt snow, but it consumes more fuel. This book is sold as a pile of garbage. It does not mention the cold. The author has no life.

Mainly, I think you wrote the supporting characters so well. The main character was originally pretty good, but in comparison it looks shabby.

Although there are many small details that have not been handled well, this subject matter is still worthy of encouragement. Apart from the facts, just tell me whether you enjoy watching it or not.

It's so beautiful, I can't take it off, write it quickly

Welcome everyone to pay attention to my work "Gao Wu: My talent is a bit unbelievable". You can read, evaluate and vote for each other~

Will my sister have any achievements in the future? I'm curious?

From the beginning, I felt that the pace was very fast. The protagonist quickly entered the situation within three chapters, accepted his situation and prepared for the next step. There are good and bad ways to write this. The good thing is that those who have read apocalyptic system texts don't have to endure the preliminary foreshadowing and can go straight to the main content. The bad thing is that readers who have never read this type of text will find it baffling. The description of the background is weak, and the causes and events of the apocalypse are briefly mentioned. The whole story only revolves around a few buildings in the community. The layout is too small. Although it is written in a small way, it is a world-wide disaster. An analogy is the feeling of paying attention to two soldiers fighting during World War. Or you can intersperse some people and things that happened at the same time in other places, just briefly describe them, and you can also arrange for the protagonist to come into contact with these people and things in the future. The description of the emotional relationship is really... Suspicious, trusting, ambiguous and anxious. The process is so fast that I don't know how to describe it. Or it can be said that it is the end of the world. The mentality of the relationship changes quickly. The dialogue between the two and the daily dialogue of the little girl also looks awkward. The daily interaction of love relationships is a weakness of most authors. As a young reader, I can't tell you how to change this. I can only tell you that it feels wrong. The intrigues between some small groups are described to that extent, but because there are too many characters, you drag them all out before the readers have formed an impression of each character. It will make it difficult to distinguish who the characters are, why they are said to be like this, and they have to turn to the front to see what is going on with this person. Especially there are several transitions in the middle. The author may want to try a movie-style transition to connect scenes with similar dialogues, but this method has the opposite effect when it is not clear who the characters are. Maybe it would be better to just add a dividing line during the transition. There are many unreasonable points in common sense. Earlier, it was said that snow is contaminated and cannot be drunk. Later, it was said that the protagonist can be drunk after it melts. Doesn't it need to be filtered? What filter to use? Even if it is filtered, can harmful substances be completely isolated? No explanation. There is also a generator. Anyone who has used it knows the noise. Even a room with good sound insulation may not be able to isolate it. What's more, if the sound insulation is not good, the exhaust gas cannot escape at night and they may be poisoned by the exhaust gas together. Others include the post-installation of glass fiber reinforced plastic panels, no one took the store supplies a hundred meters away, and the materials were moved between home and store without considering accidents on the way, etc. Or are these all reasonable, but the author didn't explain them? Let's talk about the good points. There are two main reasons why I could finish reading this book. The first is that the writing style is quite smooth and there are very few redundant descriptions in plot advancement. The second is that the protagonist's character is decisive enough, and there will be no plot where he will have a lot of psychological activities and then judge that he should not be killed and then be disgusted later. (Decisiveness refers to quickly judging how to deal with a matter. For example, whether to kill, retain, win over, or use is all decided in one word. It is not a holy lady who keeps letting people go in the hope of using or cooperating in the future, nor is it a madman who kills all the way). If the author plans to write a new book, you may consider reading it if the subject matter is suitable.