Aerospace Powerhouse: Starting with Private Rockets

I'm actually skeptical about this. We will not distinguish how many flaws there are in the published videos and how many rebuttal arguments there are. Videos can be faked, and information can also be faked. I am just talking about technical issues. I would like to put forward a few points for everyone to think about. First, in that era when female workers were still used to knit computers, how could such a huge parameter be calculated without any errors? Second, the precise vector engines required for soft landing only appeared in the 1980s. Third, how could we ensure that the spacecraft circled the moon twice before landing on the moon when communications between the two countries were still interrupted from time to time? There was also an hour on the far side of the moon, completely out of contact, and without navigation, there would inevitably be errors. (Any small error in the above three points will lead to the failure of the moon landing. Sixty years later, with the rapid advancement of aerospace technology, there are still so many failure cases. At that time, Apollo succeeded 6 times in a row!) Fourth, it takes several hours for the current spacecraft to dock with the space station, but the Apollo docking only took less than 4 hours. Do you think it was possible with the technology at that time? Fifth, the most advanced return technology is currently useless in space. However, the Apollo 6 moon landings were able to pass through the Earth-moon Lagrange point each time and were successfully captured by the earth's gravity. It was smashed into the atmosphere without serious damage. I can only say that with such luck, I could win the first prize in lottery tickets, 6 times! Sixth, how many years did it take from the time when the President of the United States announced the launch of the moon landing plan to the realization of the moon landing, given the technical reserves at the time? ,, Haha, our country's world-leading aerospace technology has taken 30 years, but it has not yet achieved a moon landing.

I was really shocked when the private rocket Tianlong 3 exploded.

What I've always been curious about is that Musk talks about going to Mars every year. Why doesn't he talk about going to the moon first or building a space station? Wouldn't it be easier to build a base on the moon and verify the technology? Are you afraid that people will come back if you directly study Mars?

Chang'e-6🐉

To be honest, I don't think there is any use for a genius to travel back in time. The aerospace system needs tens of thousands of geniuses, not just one who can change your destiny. You might as well build a system to transfer knowledge or summon talents, which is better than fighting alone.

Please comment for other names😰

Musk stud Trump has won. Now it should be impossible for FAA to cause trouble for the starship. I hope it will be done quickly. I want to see going to Mars as soon as possible.

There is no soil for this kind of enterprise to survive in this land

Rockets are not as good as cars. The rocket market is too small

Although there are only 6,000 people in the research and development team of the space plug, everyone is a top-notch person in their respective fields. Only North America in the world can gather so many top-notch people at one time. This is not only a matter of money. If you ask a top-level person to stay in an area with poor information for a few years, he will immediately become a second-rate person. He has to move a ladder to check cutting-edge papers. What a waste of time?