Blue Skies over the Spy War

I hope that your book will also allow me to promote you on the Internet for free. I am not bragging. I am still somewhat influential on the Internet, and my ability to attract traffic is pretty good. The last book I promoted for free was Teng's The Spies of the Republic of China. At that time, the data of his book increased with the naked eye. I used the wireless network to log in to V-letter and recommended three friends. I sent the message that night, which affected my friend's rest. It was visible to the naked eye that day, and it increased his reading volume by three times in total. This shows my influence on the Internet,

The shortcoming of this book is that the author is very cautious and the writing is relatively unrealistic. There are no names of real people. The Secret Service has been changed to the Military Intelligence Department. The place names are also numbers, which makes the sense of substitution poor. Others are okay. Several novels next door are not so cautious. Boss Dai and Mao Renfeng and Chiang Kai-shek have all made appearances.

I'll keep it for now, I believe in the author's explosive ability, but I still hope to give the previous book a perfect ending, otherwise it would be a pity!

What's the difference between this one and The Spy Shadow? Especially when I saw that Zhao San Loach came out again, I was really speechless. It was two books to be co-authored and the names were changed again, right?

Flaws in the first five chapters: 1. After catching the spy clues, my brother actually asked me to eat before arresting the person. If this was a foreshadowing and my brother was actually a traitor, then it would make sense. Unfortunately, the update has not reversed it yet. 2. After the spy was captured, the two people did not interrogate separately. There is no possibility of foreshadowing at all. It is purely a lack of common sense.

What we want to see is high-IQ crime, not high-IQ criminal investigation

The main character has very few roles and is rambled on here and there. It doesn't feel like the previous book.

It is too homogeneous with the author's own previous book, and this kind of writing is always in the Cao camp and the heart is in the Han... The essence is really the same.

Why is it a crime-solving theme? Isn't it true that crime-themed stories can't be written? I think we should write a counter-conventional opening where a killer specializes in killing Japanese, and then the Japanese bring in crime-solving experts from China to fight with the protagonist. It would be interesting to watch every thrill.

Maybe it's too similar to the style of this book, and I couldn't stand it after reading hundreds of thousands of words.

Personally, I hope to downplay Xu Qingshi's plot and reduce the content about the organization. Everyone knows that the fate of these people in the later period will be bad, and countless people will die, so why rush to write these plots again. I only read those about capturing the Japanese invaders, but I'm not interested in anything else. I would be more grateful if the author could give me some clues about the follow-up plot.

The first thing to write this kind of novel is to be logically self-consistent, and nothing else. If you analyze your footprints, how would you handle it if Lao Dai wants you to arrest the red party? If you don't catch him, you will be exposed directly!

The espionage novel written by Luo Feiyu is just good. Apart from waiting for the update, it is most enjoyable if you read it in one sitting. There are no messy male-female emotional dramas in other novels. It seems that you can't write a spy novel without adding a few female emotional dramas. Read a few chapters and then abandon the article

I came here from an old book. I hope it will be well written. The logical plot is online. There are too few books to read.

I hope that like Ling Yun's book, I can finish the War of Liberation, and don't end it after finishing the War of Resistance Against Japan. There are too few espionage novels that finish the War of Liberation, and it's not enough to read.

I think this one can be called "The Spy Shoe Print"

Xu Qingshi was a Red Party member at that time and was guarding the hospital. The Party Investigation Office came to arrest the injured Red Party member. It came out to contact him, but his eyes turned red? Eyes red? Are your eyes red in front of the old spy? Do you really think that the Party Affairs Investigation Department is all idiots? If people see something wrong with your expression, they can directly suspect you of collaborating! Is this still an underground party? Isn't this the same as using a loudspeaker to say that you are a red party member? Could it be that Ning Zhiheng, who is super looking for Qingteng, can't copy it? People have told you the answer and asked you to copy it, but you can't even copy it? Add less private goods

I have ordered them before, but not recently. The current chapters are really useless. Also, Xiang Hong is right, but you should also take care of your loyal subordinates,

Footprint Expert: Which of your ancestors do you really look down on? How many amazing and brilliant geniuses are in danger in the chaotic era? You are so awesome as a bricklayer? Without a golden finger, he is not much better than ordinary people.

Every author who writes about military subjects is worthy of respect. In Feiyu's books, I feel full of patriotic feelings. Don't we readers also have a patriotic heart, so we like novels with this kind of theme? Why belittle the quality of a book?

I originally wanted to order all of Spy Hai Lingyun, but by mistake I ordered Qingyun 🔨. It doesn't matter. I ordered both.

I read it without reading in 3 days. There are many shortcomings. There are many typos. There are few sentences and keywords. It is not smooth to read. But there are no big poisonous points. It is just over half of the plot. I can't see the names of the protagonists in the last dozens of chapters. Generally speaking, it is a relatively good spy novel.

Although it is a pity, I will always support you. If the next book is about military themes, I will still support you by ordering it all! Come on!

Come on!

Why did it end so quickly?

Qingyun is not as good as Lingyun, and the layout is very different. Was it written by the same author?

Reader A: I recently saw an author neglecting his business and advertising in other people's book circles every day. He placed hundreds of advertisements a day and was so exhausted that he was sweating profusely. Reader B: There is such a person. Who is the author? Reader A: Another sign of his indifference is that his book only has 100,000 words, but 20,000 to 30,000 words are summaries. Did he take the sentence in the primary school textbook seriously? Reader C: Did he review the past and learn the new? Reader A: Who cares whether he does it or not? I have read so many online articles, but I have never seen anyone write such a long summary. Even if he did it, what would happen? Reader B: What if he really did it? Reader A: If he did it, he did it. It's none of my business. Doesn't the fact that he wrote such a long summary prove that his book is particularly difficult to understand? Who can read his writing that is so difficult to understand? Reader B: What you say makes sense. It is indeed not written like this in the online article. Reader A: Yes, life is tiring enough. I come here to read online articles just to relax. If I want to gain knowledge, I will read classics. Why come here to read his difficult book. Reader C: I also want to gain knowledge. What famous book have you read recently? Recommended to me, I'll go check it out too. Reader A: Oops, I'm too busy with work recently and don't have time. I'll read it when I have time. Reader B: Let's not talk about classics, let's just talk about the book by the advertised author. Apart from knowing that he is not doing anything serious, do you have any other findings? Reader A: No, I can't read his book at all. Good online articles should all be enjoyable and can be read ten lines at a time, but if you can read his books ten lines at a time, you won't be able to understand them. Reader B: No matter how simple the writing is, you can't read it ten lines at a time. You can skip some chapters, but if you read ten lines at a glance, you may not be able to understand it even from a primary school textbook. Reader A: Aren't those who write online articles serving readers? If he can't let me understand ten lines at a glance, it means his writing is not good. If he wants to pursue his personal ideals, then he shouldn't write it here. Reader B: This is biased. Aren't there also some online articles that pay attention to details, plots, characters, and settings? And it was well received. Reader A: I don't care about this. I will always speak for my pleasure without any principles or bottom line. From my standpoint, any book I don't like is not a good book, without exception. Reader C: This is a bit too much. I have also read the advertised book you mentioned, and I also found a sign of being unprofessional, that is, he asked someone to excerpt the original text of his book and post it in the comment area. Reader B: Does any author really dare to do this? Some authors are most afraid that others will release the original text. Reader C: Not only is he not afraid to publish the original text, he is also not afraid to tell you why he wrote it this way. After reading the summary he wrote, I not only understood the plot better, but I also understood how to write a book that I like. Reader B: It's really so magical. What kind of book is this? Reader C: This is a book in which almost every paragraph is useful. The protagonists and important supporting characters in this book are things I have never seen in other books. Their thoughts and the core ideas of this book are worth pondering. Just looking at the excerpts he excerpted can arouse people's endless reverie. It's as if he wrote a real world, and it would be great if the protagonist in that world could become my friend. Reader B: What you said is quite subjective. I haven't watched those clips yet, so I don't know if what you said is true. Can you make some more objective comments? Reader C: Of course. First of all, I heard that the author has seen, read, and listened to every chapter, and in addition to writing the summary, he has read every chapter more than five times. There is not a single typo or any common sense mistake in his book. Secondly, in his summary, I understood why he wrote like this. For example, some paragraphs are to express characters, some are to advance the plot, some are to express thoughts, some characters are to establish settings, and some characters are used for comparison. Whether he is boasting or he has really done it, his ability to tell these truths proves that he has put his heart into it. Reader B: If an author is so thoughtful, then the relationship between him and his readers is no longer that of a businessman and a buyer, but that of a friend. What is the name of this book? I'll go take a look too.

I read a book similar to this one, but I don't know who copied whom 🤓

It's a pity that the book fell apart in the final stages.