Entertainment Tycoon Since 1978

Literary youth writes novels and throws them into the street

The biggest problem with this book is that the pace is too slow. The protagonist, who is learning to be a director, wrote 200 chapters and was so busy doing so many things that he didn't even get to be an assistant director? In the field of entertainment, the ink writing is broken. The only ones that can be read are probably based on the historical texts of the time. However, everyone knows that the 1970s was not a very good era. The protagonist, as a reborn person, was limited in every way and looked like the ordinary people of that era, and the advantages of the reborn person were not used at all. The protagonist in the book "The Age of Beginnings" is probably also the most aggrieved time-traveler! This era may not allow you to change the trend, but at least you have to feel better, right?

Author, you don't even know Zhang Yimou's family background? How can ordinary people like photography even if they struggle to eat? Can't price the camera? Lao Zhang's official family! Family! Home! By birth, only the national master was young and his family fell into decline for decades!

This is all for Lao Mouzi's benefit🙂

Those who appear in circles on the surface are no more than dogs in front of the real second generation. . . Not even a damn

The protagonist is becoming more and more mindless. Is the protagonist addicted to being a dog? I have been urged to write the script, and I am often told that because the protagonist writes a novel in someone else's newspaper and cannot publish it in his own home, and is scolded, the protagonist owes them? The key protagonists are not their employees. At most, it is all cooperation. Why, when we cooperate with you, we have to be restricted in where we can make money? Ill

Tao Huimin, Zhang Li, and Chen Xiaoxu are all not good-looking. They are not as good as ordinary people when they are older! Gong Xue, Zhu Lin! Not to mention old, seven or eight years older than the protagonist, Gong Xue doesn't look good even as she gets older.

If you want to promote a girl, don't talk about emotions. If you want to talk about emotions, don't be innocent. If you portray the protagonist as being affectionate and having a harem, don't you think the character design is very bad?

To be honest, I personally have always had a good sense of Liu Xiaoqing, and he has a high emotional intelligence (at least after he was released from prison). Although it is not in my aesthetic sense, he is indeed a very interesting person.

Literary youth and long-windedness are two different words.

It's too divisive. At first, the protagonist calls other people scum, but in the end, he is no different. So what's the point of talking about others' shame?

Another plagiarized novel with a sense of justice. No different from others. The arrangement is inconsistent with the logic of historical development. The author himself doesn't know much about filmmaking. Don't look at it.

This is a slow-paced novel with a reasonable layout, rigorous conception, flesh and blood, homely stories, and the mark of the times. Although the text is not gorgeous, it can be read like a trickling stream, letting the breath of the times hit your face.

Don't have a harem, you can just have a one-night stand on the set. The harem is really boring. I don't care about fighting and quarreling. I just want to see the real director's work. Chen Kaige and Zhang Yimou are all affected by the emotional problems of the people around them and have problems all over the body. They won't last long.

Can't we write about Chinese people going abroad? What can you film in those days? No matter how high the status is, it is only domestic. When we were still making youth movies, the Lord of the Rings came out. It is not licking. They are indeed awesome. We are now in 2025, and a Nezha actually has such a high box office. It is really outrageous.

If there is no conflict, if you forcefully create a conflict and then handle it poorly, the protagonist in reality will easily be beaten to death.

I'm a little disappointed that most Hong Kong films are still ordinary commercial films. Even if the author doesn't adapt them, he should make some awesome films instead. For example, there are very few Chinese films, but they still copy them, and they are still commercial films from Hong Kong. The first part Burning, the second part, Infernal Affairs (remade in the United States and won an Oscar), Transcendence (I particularly love it) The Silence of the Lambs (full of camerawork) Forrest Gump (a classic) The Matrix ( Sci-fi benchmark) Alice in Wonderland (no explanation at the box office) Titanic (no one has done it yet and it will be popular once it is hyped) Interstellar (laying the foundation for the future three-body) Three-body (Advent) Three-body (Wallfacer Project). Three-Body Problem (Dark Forest Sword Holder). Trisomy (mass extinction). The Three-Body Problem (Death in the Starry Sky) Established the Chinese Film Museum, invited people from all over the world to join, increased visibility, the last movie (the rotation of the protagonist)

The protagonist has done so many things, but he is still a student, has an unfair reputation, and the protagonist is like a good old guy.

In fact, don't write the heroine on your card, write all the supporting characters on the card. As long as the woman doesn't get married, it won't affect having children. Don't reborn people know the relationship between men and women and the social status in the future? People with huge assets are not suitable for marriage. As for women, just keep them.

I can't stand it anymore, can I read it again?

After reading about 30 chapters, I really can't stand it anymore. So awkward.

In 1978, the poor people had never taken a picture in their life. There were many people who had no pictures, let alone a camera. Ordinary people would not have the idea of ​​learning art. There was no one to guide them.

It's great to have a single female protagonist, but the few added at the end are more like pendants, to satisfy men's vanity. Either end it all, or don't push it. The article looks down on other people's private lives, but when it comes to myself, it's all the same. It's very divisive!

The first few chapters are too frivolous, this was the 1970s

Why don't you grab this writing at this price

Picture of the heroine.