The Witcher: Master of Witcher Signs

If you encounter unruly people, maim them or kill them outright to save the disgusting people.

I probably know why there are so few people here. Let me ask you, how do people who want to read The Witcher search for corresponding novels? First search for Witcher, then search for Witcher, or Witcher 3. Which of the above is closely related to you? The answer is: no.

Many novels do not kill villagers, and this one is the same, so this book is bound to collapse. No one will read a witcher novel that does not kill villagers and does not build its reputation with blood. Everyone just wants to see blood flowing like a river.

The essence of why witchers are suppressed is because most witchers are too kind. The best among witchers can hunt dragons, so mages, kings, and nobles can hunt them. If there are fewer monsters, everyone will discriminate against witchers? Then think of ways to increase the number of monsters, guide the monsters to attack the village, and accept the bounty if they are not dead. If they are dead, drive away the monsters. Try not to kill those who can, and search the village without fear of others knowing. After all, there are not so many cameras in the medieval setting.

There is a problem with the setting of the witcher world. Since ancient times, only people with weapons have bullied ordinary people. I can't understand why villagers would have the guts to provoke people like witchers.

I only discovered this book a few days ago, and I read it in less than a week during several long-distance trips. After reading it, I wanted to find some more witcher books. They either had some bullshit system or followed the Wudiliu Shuangwen style. In the end, they all went for the unification of the witcher emperor. Is this what a witcher is supposed to do? Is this what the world should be like? I have always believed that fan works must follow the tone of the original work to develop the story. The protagonist was born through the combined efforts of many parties and a little accident (the author's powerful confluence of heaven and earth). He is a demon hunter with ancient blood and magical talent. The author deliberately controlled not to let the protagonist break through this boundary during the entire writing process. In my opinion, it is very good. To be honest, it is more measured than when I played The Witcher 3 (the classic game of Blood and Wine and then the Wild Hunt). The protagonist has really integrated into this world. It can be said that he is working hard with the mentality that success depends on people and God, instead of running rampant in the world like a bull. For me, this is a definite plus point, because the author really thought about respecting the original work. The protagonist is not simply the author's alien visitor, but also a real part of this world. But let's talk about the shortcomings. First of all, it may be the shortcomings of the author's insufficient notes and the update mode of online articles. For example, at the beginning, the mage apprentice who was a herbalist was engaged in human experimentation with black magic. The author let him go to the forest to find elves to fend for himself. The readers thought that he was letting the tiger return to the mountain to create a boss. Of course, after the subsequent chapters, he died soon after updating. This kind of problem needs to be weighed by the author in his next work. Another thing that I personally don't like very much is Dandelion in this book. The main reason is that the plot in which he appears, especially the dialogue, has too many gags and is a bit worn out. I don't like this very much. The ending is also too fast at the end. Of course, this is actually because the data behind the work is not very good. The author has really worked hard to persevere, so it is not a big problem. It can only be said that this book is a bit untimely? The tone of the Witcher world is slow-burning. Nowadays, there are not many new people who like games like The Witcher 3, and more readers like cool and invincible articles. The author doesn't want to destroy the way this world should be, that's all. Finally, I would like to thank the author for bringing me such a book. I can also feel that the author and I have the same appreciation attitude towards wizards. Thanks to the author and looking forward to the next work.

The first chapter is pretty good, but the rest of it feels weird. Also, the way Geralt is written is so weird. Isn't he a sullen, reserved person? Why is he hahaha all day long? He's too cheerful.

If you have played The Witcher 1 and 2, you should know that at least the protagonist Geralt you control has never been neutral in actual actions, although he said that the witcher should be neutral. In The Witcher 1, the Knights route will kill the Scoia'tael, the Scoia'tael route will kill the Knights, and the "neutral" route will kill both. In The Witcher 2, the protagonist was helping the king suppress the rebellion from the very beginning. Later, both the Blue Guards and the Scoia'tael were very biased towards a certain force. They killed a lot of humans. The Scoia'tael even helped the non-human race to establish an independent country. Why are you afraid of the army? In 2, Reso killed several kings in the north alone. As soon as the king died, there was civil strife due to succession, and the army was used to fight the civil war. In addition, one of the reasons why witchers have a bad reputation is that they are said to be emotionless, cold mutant killers. If witchers showed their own emotions, they would not be rejected by so many people.

The writing is really good, and it has a bit of the feel of the original novel and game of The Witcher. I think the most attractive thing about witchers is the chaos of the world, there is no right or wrong, and witchers, as characters similar to knights (White Wolf is more similar, but not necessarily others), experience/participate in the stories of this world, large and small. Many fans put too much emphasis on the "feeling", but in turn they lose the "two sides of the sword" feeling in the world of the witcher. (Of course, there is nothing wrong with the author trying to attract readers, but I feel that if the current tone of the story can be maintained, it can also attract many readers who like it). Cheers, author 😁.

If you can't write a romantic scene, don't force it. The scene with Triss at the Warlock Academy was really embarrassing 😥