Great Ming: This Boy Is a Monster, He Must Not Be Spared

To be honest, if the protagonist didn't like Zhu Yuanzhang, he should have run away long ago. The nature of this book is to lick Zhu Yuanzhang. If you don't want to fall into Zhu Yuanzhang's eyes, pretending to be mentally retarded is better than showing off some modern knowledge, and rush to find something for yourself. It's not that the protagonist can't mess with Zhu Yuanzhang, the problem is that it's too disgusting to lose one's own ability to support Zhu Yuanzhang. Zhu Yuanzhang's character is very unpleasant, and he is a constant thief. The protagonist is reluctant to even give up money to do things, but the protagonist still leans in to let Zhu take advantage of him. You want to say how great Zhu Yuanzhang is, and it is very cool that he established a new dynasty. Then, what are the benefits of the protagonist? Lao Zhu is essentially a person from a feudal society, and his character is also violent. The protagonist behaves too evilly, and in the end it is intolerable for the protagonist not to be cut into pieces.

The Ming Dynasty II would have died without Zhu Di Jingnan. Is Zhu Yuanzhang so mentally retarded that he can't see it? ? When I read history books, I can see that the author only reads what is written, without any understanding of his own. Can he still write a historical article at this level? Can you read it? !

You write a historical article, but even Baidu refuses to look it up. The first chapter says that the timeline is the 27th year of Zhizheng, that is, 1367 (in the second year, Zhu Yuanzhang ascended the throne), and according to Baidu Encyclopedia, Zhu Yuanzhang (1328- 1398), Yao Guangxiao (1335-1418) In 1367, Zhu Yuanzhang was 1367-1328=39 years old, and Yao Guangxiao was 1367-1335=32 years old! ! The author wrote that Yao Guangxiao was less than 20 years old? ? ? This is only the first chapter, and even the most basic age of the protagonist you wrote is wrong. Could you be any more outrageous?

It's a rubbish book with contradictions everywhere.

You can get all this stuff, just pay extra, right?

I don't understand what professional terms you are talking about with a group of ancient people? There is a sense of beauty that if you don't have much knowledge, you should expose it when you have nothing to do.

To be honest, this plot is very disappointing. The essence of it is just children being bullied and fighting. The author forcibly developed it into a party struggle, but did not compile a logical process for it at all. Are all the parents of Guozixue students subordinate to Hu Weiyong? Obviously not; aren't there any normal students among Guozi studies? Obviously impossible; if the parents are Hu Weiyong's comrades, will they definitely support him in this kind of thing? Of course not. The incident happened in a sensitive place like Guozixue. As soon as the emperor made instructions to bridge the north and the south, Hu Weiyong's son bullied the children of the north. It is understandable that Hu Weiyong wanted to take revenge when his son was beaten out of paternal love, but it was far-fetched to instigate Li Shanchang to instigate his comrades and even all parents of students to force their children to give false testimony, and Li Shanchang actually agreed! His comrades actually agreed. What benefits did they gain from doing this? The answer given by the author seems to be - show off your power! It was really awesome to show the emperor and the court their ability to mistake a deer for a horse.

Is there a possibility that after Zhu Yuanzhang knew those things, he would not choose Zhu Yunwen, a loser (it is nothing to violently cut down the vassal, after all, the emperor of the Ming Dynasty did not have overwhelming strength than the Han Dynasty, but he had such overwhelming strength that he was killed suddenly and not cut yet. This is the place of the loser) After Zhu Yuanzhang knew all that, first of all from an emotional point of view. He was not very accepting, because Zhu Yuanzhang basically treated all his sons with the same virtue as the translated prince. Secondly, from a rational point of view, Zhu Yunwen is such a waste, and from a rule point of view, after the death of the prince who has not succeeded to the throne, he should choose another prince from the emperor's other existing sons, rather than creating a so-called grandson So logically speaking, if Zhu Yuanzhang's third son is still alive at this time, there is a high probability that King Jin will be made the prince. Compared with the second son of the emperor, King Qin, King Jin had more sophisticated methods and was both civil and military. He also made great achievements in pacifying the nobles in Huaixi. At that time, King Yan basically followed his gilded mixed experience.

Yao Guangxiao is too complicated. Writing it is too brain-consuming to write, and the writing style is too demanding. Writing it simply makes people around him act like fools and clowns, which is boring. Besides, is Zhu Yuanzhang so complicated to kill a monk? Cut it off, your own children are all good, and the stupid things you do are all instigated by outsiders. This is human nature. How can the order maniac have time to meet with a kid who is definitely encouraging his four children to rebel? The role of the emperor will not be there immediately after the founding of the country. There will be an adaptation process. The role will not change before and after the founding of the country. Is it difficult for a warlord to kill just an individual? Besides, Zhu Yuanzhang had been involved in temples and cult organizations. Do you think he would believe these things? Just making things up.

There are no sewers or drainage channels. How many of the nine tribes built this city?