Chancellor

Posting this, I don't want to offend the author. This book gave me the feeling of being a historical fact, bland and aggrieved. The indigenous protagonist has no ability to change. Until chapter 100, it is a historical record. The protagonist is unable to change anything, including the murder of his father. I can't watch it anymore, because Chen Xiang can be emperor without the protagonist. The protagonist is useless at all. I know that the author wants the protagonist to grow up, but the growth of the indigenous protagonist does not resonate with us readers who read the book. It can only make readers feel frustrated. People who read history want the protagonist to change history, rather than what history is and what the protagonist is.

As a historical novel, this book is obviously pretty good in terms of depiction of the historical background and plot design. It is unavoidable to use a large amount of historical materials, but the flaws do not hide the flaws. As a web article, it is very thoughtful. But there are still some rough parts, and the author still needs to polish some details. For example, it is incredible that the protagonist takes the initiative to let his concubine's younger brother become the heir to inherit his father's title. In the article, the protagonist believes that the eggs of building a family cannot be put in one basket. Although this is not unreasonable, as the eldest son, it is a bit suffocating to take the initiative to help Xiaozong to the position of the great clan. The protagonist will not simply I don't know what the position of this heir means. It's not that the title cannot be passed on to the younger brother in the future, but at this critical moment, if you give up the status of the clan, you may not be able to establish a family temple without usurping the throne. The author's indifference to the patriarchal system makes the protagonist simply like a male college student. When facing the top people in the world, he can talk about etiquette as innocently as a college student who is not deeply involved in the world. And the creation of this protagonist does little to promote the plot. The protagonist does pretty well in things that can really promote the plot. Once the personal relationship between the protagonist's children is involved, he does not consider the consequences at all. There is also the son who was born during the mourning period. In the future, the protagonist's political opponents will not have to find any other reasons to criticize him. One act of unfilial piety can kill him. And judging from the subsequent plot, the protagonist's contraceptive measures are very good. After returning to Jiangnan for several years, he has not been able to give birth to a child, so he has to give birth to a son during the mourning period, right? It's simply toxic.

Stop writing, you are not suitable for eating this bowl of rice

The protagonist's eldest son Hou Chang'an has to change his name, the author. His name violates the taboo of his grandfather Hou Andu. This was a very serious matter in the context of that era. It was a matter of forgetting one's ancestors and would be scolded to death.

Read some content and express your own opinions. Historical literature (except for historical fiction), if you want to change, you cannot be aboriginal. There are many heroic figures in history. No matter how powerful a native you are, you can only play a supporting role among the protagonists of history. If you have no thoughts or changes in concepts, how can you win over those historical protagonists? If it is written successfully, it will be a historical fiction and still controversial. It might as well be time travel or awakening memories.

Is it my imagination? Or is it the power of big data? I feel like there are more and more people writing about the Northern and Southern Dynasties now.

I have just started reading it. After reading more than a dozen chapters, I feel that the writing is very good and the historical knowledge is profound. It seems that I have made full preparations before starting the book. But I came to read the novel and find a sense of substitution from the characters and enter the story as quickly as possible. But the long historical events Case... I might as well watch "Zi Zhi Tong Jian" by myself. It's too dramatic. I just got some feeling from the protagonist, and it's just a large general event. I might as well change my personal perspective, such as Hou Andu or Chen Baxian to write a hearty siege or encounter! Then, historical events are interspersed through dialogues or carefully crafted reports. The psychological descriptions or subtle movements of people make people feel more immersed in it. It can also make people immersed in that period of history through the brutality of the scenes. Novels... We still need to look at the story through people. How can we be immersed in the scene? Maybe it will be better later...

How can you make an initial order of more than 10,000 yuan without having any high-quality products? Don't you even need to restrain yourself from brushing?

I read the title of the book Xiangguo, and the protagonist is a native, basically for Chen Baxian to conquer the world. The author has perfectly screened out 90% of the readers of historical literature 🤭🤭

Is it so expensive to write a book now?