America 1981: Earthshaking

Author, except for the three golden chapters, I scanned the rest of it. When I saw the latest, I had some new thoughts. Your title and the first few paragraphs of each chapter are not very attractive, so I don't want to read it seriously. Yes, I read it seriously. If you can't change the structure, then you'd better learn from other novels and put out pictures of named objects in each chapter that you think are not popular with readers but are realistic and powerful. ——Almost all of the female celebrities who appear in entertainment articles are pictured above. What should you include in this book? Pictures of actresses must be included. Secondly, pictures of landmark buildings that are appropriate can be included. Then there are the introductions to the background of the theater system. You can give text introductions, paragraphs, and chapter reviews, or the writer may say. Because these information introductions do not need to be spent on copying and pasting the plot. For those group CEOs, you should introduce them like this: the protagonist goes to their territory and meets the boss. If the dialogue is interesting, focus on the dialogue. After writing, point out the characteristics of the character you want to write about, "Jew" - because he is a Jew. Just point out the characteristics of the object of this chapter that will have an impact on the protagonist in the future. As for the name of the boss, he will only be given a name if he appears later and has a role. Otherwise, in the early stage, he will only be given the name 'Boss', just the president of the group. I am just saying this because I struggled to read it at random. I know I read it carefully and I can understand it, but why should you, the author? Which point did you write well? Is it worth my serious reading? So this is a logical cycle. If your writing is good, I will analyze it word by word. If your writing is not good, I will scroll through it. So do you think your writing is good or not? That's why some novels are extremely exaggerated in the early stages, just to attract readers! So you can't change the text and you can't find the direction to change the text. You have to let readers understand it. To make it easy to understand, you need to include background information, either text or pictures of actresses, because pictures are the main force of Internet traffic. This is the solution without changing the text! Let me exaggerate: If I follow my approach, the first female lead and the second female lead in the early stage will be "Phoebe" and "Jenny". I will directly write it as Licking Dog 1 and Licking Dog 2 to match the appearance of the protagonist. ——Licking Dog No. 1 Came to play with me today. What are you playing with? She held my arm and wanted to play with me; Licking Dog No. 2 Met by chance again, and it was always lunchtime. She always took me to dinner, but why are you always looking at me? Don't you want to eat? She shook her head and said she loved being vegetarian! ➡Then when the plot is promoted and the heroine changes (grows up), the protagonist becomes an adult. At this time, the name is changed to her real name, whichever actress she is. Then look at the direction of the trend, which heroine is more popular, and which heroine has a short nickname, otherwise the full name will be used until the end. As for the protagonist's relatives and friends, they are all introduced by pronouns, such as mom and dad, godparents, uncles and aunts, etc. Only when the protagonist talks to his parents, for example, according to your setting, the protagonist calls his mother by their first name, and he and his dad are his dear father. So only important characters are given names and surnames, minor characters are given names, and again they only have pronouns ➡ driver, bodyguard, photographer, etc... Don't give names easily, it's mainly because it looks confusing, and of course you shouldn't have authors!

Jennifer Connelly

I can still accept writing musicals in the past. After all, the protagonist's memory is pretty much the same. Writing novels in the future is too nonsense. Without that writing style, just by memorizing an outline, I want to restore the original work and become a top creator. Are you thinking nonsense, author? Too special code is fake

The writing is pretty good. Collected. In the American entertainment industry in the 1980s, the only ones that fit our aesthetic were Jennifer Connelly, Brooke Shields, and Phoebe Cates. Madonna counts as one. Europe has more

Phoebe Cates

The cheating of mind control in urban novels has a strong sense of fragmentation

Phoebe Keys pictures Jennifer Connelly I never understand such a fairy and some people say that her flowering period is short. . . Go search for her participation in the exhibition this time. . I'm 55 and in good condition. .

Why do I feel like the protagonist is too conservative!

😍

I always feel that the author's career is too complicated, especially musicals. I feel like not many people know about it.

Diane Lane

The writing is very good and makes people want to read it.

There are too few people writing about entertainment nowadays, and there are even fewer people who can write smoothly and read like this author. But the timeline of this book is a bit confusing. On Baidu, Phoebe Cates was born in 1963, and Connery was born in 1970. There is a seven-year age difference. It's hard to imagine that a sixth-grade elementary school student and a freshman college student are best friends. It feels like it's a bit forced to be together with childhood sweethearts.

Brooke Shields

Although it has some shortcomings, it is still an interesting novel. I hope I can keep writing it at a high level.

Chapter 40 is really poisonous, but chapter 59 might make me give up! What do you need to know to buy stocks and invest? You wouldn't set the protagonist to learn financial knowledge? And doesn't he have the ability to brainwash? Can't he make a securities broker a dead soldier? ! ! You don't want the dividends of the times, but you just don't know a word? ! I just forcefully wrote that I don't want shares of Apple and Microsoft without any logic! It's mindless, out of touch with reality and too deliberate. Sorry if that's the case, bye bye.