Traitors and Rebels at the End of the Han Dynasty

The novel of the Three Kingdoms only requires the emperor to control the princes. I think everything is fine. This is a poison to hold the emperor in order to control the princes. There's always civil unrest. It can also easily cause internal divisions. And troubled times. The emperor is the one who has strong soldiers and horses. It would be a good idea to use a fig leaf to threaten the Queen Mother and the Han Dynasty.

To sum up, if you don't read enough books, you don't read history, you don't understand common sense, you just rely on yourself to entertain yourself.

It's unreasonable for the protagonist not to be in a high position. He is called an adult everywhere and there are foster fathers everywhere. With so many adoptive fathers, it is unreasonable for the protagonist not to be in a high position.

I read a chapter and then read the comments to express my feelings. Why do we feel that many books written by old authors are no longer good? The answer is: It's not that the author's level has declined, but that the reader's level has improved.

The author is still full of firepower, but the readers are no longer able to cope with it, and they are all gone, and they are running out of ammunition and food! It's difficult!

Does anyone else read this b's book? Didn't the last book completely ruin your character? It doesn't mean anything else, just pass by and spit a few mouthfuls of saliva, bah

I had previously read "The Rebellious Officials and Traitors in the Late Song Dynasty" and gave it up for some reason. I read it again in the past two days. When I wrote about Chao Gai's death, I couldn't hold back. This kind of broken-down logic thinking is simply shocking. Song, Jiang, and Wu Yong were so unscrupulous. Duan is cruel and ruthless, and the male protagonist himself knows that he is the biggest threat. Chao Gairuo will not completely break up with each other. Even if they confront each other in the future, there will not be so many insidious worries... It's okay to raise bandits with self-respect, but the key is that this bandit cannot escape from his control. Chao Gai is not Song Jiang's fellow, and he will not have no bottom line in order to develop and strengthen Liangshan, and his methods are extremely vicious... It is said that the two of them are kept in order to disrupt the Song Dynasty so that the male protagonist can achieve great things. What the hell, does the chaos of the Song Dynasty have anything to do with Liangshan?                 Don't Fang La, Tian Hu, and Wang Qing exist?         ，…，，，，，  ，  ，            No wonder I have written a lot of novels but they are not famous, they are a complete mess...

The author has written so many books, a level 5 writer, with 20 million words, but why does it feel like the author doesn't want to make progress? There are all kinds of mistakes in the article, just like a novice. In the first chapter, we saw that during the Three Kingdoms period, the author asked his wife to call her husband "Ms.-In-law"! What a show.

When you see someone, you call him "adult." How can you call someone daddy when you meet someone?

It turns out that this is a self-promotional harem story where the head grows on the lower body, so there is no need to consider the rationality.