With Cao Cao at My Side, Why Fear the World?

So the original traitor can still get a good ending in the end, but the one who is dedicated to being a traitor ends up with a bad reputation, betrayal and alienation? Why did the author deliberately arrange it this way? Is it because the author likes people like Cao Cao and hates Liu Bei?

To spread some knowledge to the author, the ancients of the late Han Dynasty and Three Kingdoms did not kneel when they saw the emperor. They only knelt when the emperor ascended the throne or when he was given a title. On weekdays, they bowed when they went to court, which meant bending down at a wide angle, with the standard of ninety degrees. This ancient ritual continued into the Ming Dynasty, and the emperor was still a minister. It was only in the Manchu and Qing dynasties that the waist was truly broken, and they knelt down and called themselves slaves. Moreover, in the pre-Qin, Han and Three Kingdoms, monarchs and ministers all had seats facing each other, and the scholar-bureaucrats usually sat facing each other. This sitting is special. It is not the kneeling sit like in TV shows. In Japanese sitting, you sit with your toes straight and your buttocks stretched out on your calves. In Chinese sitting, you sit with your feet facing down but your buttocks sitting on your heels. There is a small lump or cushion under your buttocks. This thing is covered by the robe after sitting down, so Chinese sitting is also called Ke sitting!

Author, you must have read too much of the New Three Kingdoms, why do you like to describe the emperor's uncle as a villain so much? Yes, the title of the book is tied to Cao Cao, but the emperor's uncle is also an important supporting character. I read it at one o'clock in the morning. It is really good. When I saw chapter 235, I felt that the writing was very strange. Not only did the emperor's book have a small belly and chicken intestines, it was also written in such a way that he wanted to save face and gain a bit of territory. Afterwards, he also wanted to find the oily brother. Not to mention whether the emperor's uncle is that kind of person. The protagonist started his career so early, long before Cao Cao unified the north, and has a lot to do. Not to mention Liu Bei bowing to him, he would at least be more loyal. It is always written like a grass-headed king, describing Liu, Guan, and Zhang as one being several times, describing the appearance of the emperor's uncle, landlord, and old money several times, and also focusing on Guan Yu's loyalty. Isn't this just to separate these and use them as protagonists? Uncle Huang only gained courage after Zhan Jing started his career after the Battle of Chibi and then fought in the Battle of Hanzhong. How could he have so many small ideas before that. I don't mean anything else. I just want to stop writing Liu Bei like a villain in the future. Cao Wei has the character of Cao Wei, Ji Han has Ji Han's ideals, and Soochow has the stubbornness of Soochow. This is the Three Kingdoms.

The more I read these chapters these days, the more disgusting I feel. One of Liu Bei's moves accidentally turned into a traitor in your writing. Either you can hold a bowl of water indifferently, after all, the pen is in your hand. Although Liu Bei is forced to be like this, it is also because your pen is written like this. But if you really hold a bowl of water in a balanced way, Liu Bei cannot In your novel, he was killed by a mistake, and Cao Cao openly rebelled against the protagonist again and again. The protagonist wiped his butt every time. It turned out that he had to wipe his butt. Now, if the protagonist continues to be manipulated by Cao Cao after the Jingzhou incident, the handling method is still the same as before. , Tacitly agree that Cao Cao is looking for a scapegoat, and what you wrote about Xun You is disgusting. Xun You assassinated Dong Zhuo, and he should not be like this now. In fact, when Cao Cao was just falling apart in the Eastern Han Dynasty, his performance showed that he also wanted to restore the Han Dynasty, so Xun Yu chose Cao Cao. It was also one of the reasons why Xun You chose Cao Cao later. It was just that Xun You knew how to follow the trend, but Xun Yu was firm in his bottom line. As time went by, when Cao Cao's ambition to become king gradually surfaced, his uncle Xun Yu, who had the same ideal as Xun You, began to admonish Cao Cao. I hope Cao Cao will remember his promise, but Cao Cao resolutely proclaimed himself King of Wei. Xun Yu soon died of depression, but Xun You was different. When he saw the situation clearly, he gave up the idea of ​​reviving the Han Dynasty. Not only did he not admonish Cao Cao, but he also acted cautiously. Oh, what you wrote~, the last few chapters are hard to finish in one sentence~

The charm of this novel lies in the fact that other novels about the Three Kingdoms are all about fighting for hegemony and conquering the world, but this book can only dance in the position of a puppet emperor. Don't be too tough, after all, Lao Cao is a powerful official; don't be too soft, or Lao Cao will take advantage of you. This grasp is really wonderful! !

I feel that Cao Cao is the true loyal minister of the Han Dynasty. 1. Cao Cao was the only one who did not proclaim himself emperor until his death. Big ears couldn't bear it anymore. 2. Without Cao Cao, Liu Xie would not even know how many feet of grass would be on his grave. Whoever still provides for him properly would have a share of the world. Who else is holding the emperor's order? 3 It's actually easy to understand why Liu Xie didn't return the government. Can Liu Xie survive? Can the aristocratic families who started with Cao Cao agree? If Cao Cao could withstand the pressure of the aristocratic families and not proclaim the emperor, he must have been exhausted mentally and physically.

During the Han Dynasty, Buddhism was not yet mainstream in the Three Kingdoms. The Yellow Turbans of Taoism rebelled, and Buddhism also rebelled. At that time, Zuo Rong, a fellow villager of Mu Lao Tao in Xuzhou, was a Buddhist and even cannibalized people. Later, he rebelled against Lao Tao and went to Yangzhou, causing the war between Lao Tao and Cao Cao to be unstable and defeated! It is a pity that in later generations, Zuo Rongrang was exonerated. He achieved positive results in Buddhism and became a sage.

Guandu should not have saved Cao Cao. After the death of Cao Xiu, Cao Hong, and Xia Houyuan, the Cao family lost most of its strength. As long as Cao Ang took over smoothly, there would be no internal conflicts. Moreover, the protagonist has grown up, and Cao Cao is no longer needed in the world. It is completely unreasonable and forced for the sake of the plot.

Let's see what good ideas everyone has.

Cao Cao can be a loyal minister, but Liu Bei can't be a real villain in your writing. Of course, people have different opinions. Some people think it's true temperament, and some think it's a hypocrite. Liu Bei has a unwillingness to be subordinated to others. Cao Cao didn't dare to openly oppose the emperor's order. How dare Liu Bei? A Yuzhou shepherd went to Jingzhou. If he didn't do his own job, he would first help others with their work, and then kill him first. You must know that he is not the insignificant Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty in history. By doing this, Liu Bei could hide it from the people of the world, but could he hide it from Zhuge Liang and Xu Shu, the smartest people in the world who had ever seen the emperor? It is impossible to say that he is still assisting him. Without top civil servants, Liu Bei will still be the same person in history. The Liu Bei before he met Zhuge Liang, even if he has the title of imperial uncle, he will not be able to achieve anything famous.