Werewolf: Peeking at Night, Please Stop Acting!

The setting is really poisonous. Forget about the national competition and the world competition, there is also a werewolf killing holy land.

What do you think? Not many people have watched Werewolf, but it can't be considered unpopular. It's okay if you write it carefully, but how can you play it with such a big cheat?

I have read Chapter 30 and would like to express my opinion. Since I have never played Werewolf, I will not discuss the content of the author's game, but only the rest of the plot and characterization. At the beginning of the chapter, a player was poached by his opponent before the game started, which is quite vulgar, but since the author only mentioned it in one sentence and there were no other meaningless descriptions, it is acceptable. The descriptions of the female characters are all beautiful. It may be the author's personal preference and it is acceptable. However, it is not good to describe too much in the game and the focus is out of balance. Secondly, the author's description level is too ancient and has the flavor of more than ten years ago. The dialogue between the characters outside the game is relatively low-level, but the audience's speeches are acceptable and normal, neither brilliant nor explosive. In addition, the protagonist is 1.8 Meters tall and the coach is 1.7 Meters tall. The coach taps the protagonist on the shoulder and even stands on tiptoe. Can't she raise her hand? In addition, in the first competition, the judge's full score for the protagonist was acceptable, but it was the first time in history that it was not acceptable because it was too forceful. Generally speaking, the characters in this book are relatively stereotyped and ordinary, but they are not poisonous, and the plot is not too poisonous. In summary, the evaluation is passable.

This book is well written, but there is a big problem. I think it should be a fatal problem. The protagonist shows off from the beginning to the end, and even the MVP is not targeted by anyone. Normally, if the real identity is not hidden, there will be a werewolf who will knife you, a witch will not save you, and a prophet will test you. The witch eats the knife and poisons you directly, and everyone in the audience catches your loopholes. If you are not sure about the start, it will fly you first, but it is true that everyone seems to be unaware of the threat of the protagonist. He is very awesome, but I just don't take it personally. After watching it for a long time, I feel tired and even don't want to watch it at all, even if it is well written.

Instead of pushing the wolf gun prediction, push the real prediction instead. It is also called "guaranteing one more round and letting him die at night." Isn't this purely funny? No matter who you push, the prophet will go away. It is better to push the wolf gun to correct the perspective. I have never heard that pushing the true prediction can take multiple rounds.

To be honest, what the author wrote is quite interesting and the logic is very strong, but it is also a bit poisonous. I have read more than 80 chapters, and the biggest poisonous point is the final scoring process. There is really no need to forcefully give the protagonist 10 points. The Magician one I saw voted out the Prophet and gave ten points back. While talking about the impact of actions and words on the situation, the score was given ten points. Even if there is a strategic plan to create a prophet, some points should be deducted. Based on this, even though the witch was on the wrong team at first, she managed to poison the two wolves, so I'd give her a 6/7 score anyway. I understand that the author wants to highlight the protagonist's superior resourcefulness, but there is really no need to force it to be ten points. It makes the judges look like he has some kind of skin deal, which is a bit of a show. But overall it's good, (there are quite a few) and it's a good pastime when you're bored. Once I've booked them all and saved up a monthly pass, I'll give it to you. Come on, I also hope that readers who like this book will support the author more. It is really good.

I enjoyed watching it at first, and I subscribed to it a few times. The more I watched it, the more nonsense it became 🤤🤤 It must conform to some basic logic. Hunters leap to the wolf, civilians leap to hunt, no one can resist

As a werewolf fan, I came here when I saw your name. What you wrote is not very good, and there is a serious sense of fragmentation. Sometimes it's off the field, and sometimes it's on the field. I can't fully immerse myself in it. When you write about Werewolf, you should also have played Werewolf. You should know this feeling. If you don't listen carefully to the speeches of the people on the scene and can't be immersed in it, there are always other factors that will affect your thoughts. When I read your novel, I was just about to immerse myself in it and see what was going on in this game, but you suddenly described it off the court, which was very disturbing to my thoughts.

Werewolf has a golden finger, but it's ridiculous to have such a large angle of view with your eyes open throughout the night. In order to write a book like this well, you have to write lines for twelve people, which is very difficult. If you add such a big hook, it will be very boring after just the first few chapters to give people a sense of freshness, because everything that happens later is predictable and very boring. If you want to continue writing this book, you'd better get rid of your golden fingers, watch those werewolf killing videos on the Internet, and write some classic or interesting twists and turns, maybe it can make people watch it more.

First of all, this is a trick. It's not that you can't open a God's perspective at night, and it's not a big trick. But you can leave some room for thinking. On the first night, the reader will be given a God's perspective, and from the second night onwards, the protagonist will be given a God's perspective. In fact, it is almost enough. Of course this can no longer be changed, forget it, the biggest problem is that you write without understanding the board. Someone has already said to the Wolf Beauty Knight that the first sword attack on the witch did not poison the wolf. In a serious competition, she would have already self-destructed and slashed. Who will give you a chance to poke the Wolf Beauty? The LAL board is even more abstract. The ghost wolf has been changed two seasons ago to be immortal by eating the wolf knife. Diablo Kane will definitely not be able to get out if he is imprisoned. Furthermore, the protagonist in some places is relatively smart and has broadened his horizons. What is the use of banning Kane on the first night? I'll definitely ban the Witch and Archangel first, and I'm sure I'll die on the first night. This board is the good guy advantage board. If the wolf doesn't kill anyone on the first night, he has to bet on the good guy using the wolf gun. What if the good guy stands up and hugs him, and the boat capsizes in the gutter? This question is actually easy to answer. After all, everyone may not immediately realize where the wisdom is, especially those new boards. However, it must be pointed out that in the subsequent rounds of updates, most of the results can be guessed at a glance, and plug-ins are not fully used. The first few games were okay, with a bit of a plug-in feel. But in the later games, such as the Wolf Beauty Knight game, when you see the protagonist taking the knight, you basically don't have to guess, it must be Wolf Beauty. In the streamer game, when I saw the protagonist using the streamer, I didn't have to guess. He must have killed the maid. To be honest, these operations do not require cheating to be able to play. There is really no need to write this kind of game where the ending can be guessed from the beginning. It is better to take a few civilian wolves and see how the protagonist uses the cheating perspective to make up speeches to deceive good people/resist important werewolves.