This Villain Just Wants to Escape from the Main Plot

I gave up the article after reading more than sixty chapters; the plot, writing, and atmosphere creation were not perfect~... This is the most outline article I have ever read... No one was able to improve the protagonist's emotional changes and plot foreshadowing in the early stages. Originally, the concept of the dream dungeon after falling off the cliff was very good, but it turned out to be bland and bland by the author. The dungeon is already big, so how about a more suspenseful atmosphere and exploration progress? No, it just pushes the main line at the beginning, which is not much different from the routine of ancient early novels. The first female character nm who has an emotional relationship with the protagonist is the same as a script reward drop; there is basically no complicated and ambiguous emotional change process between the two people. I just feel that the girl is inexplicably attached to the protagonist's "human sanity" as if she is blind. Furthermore, can the author stop worrying about that hot internet meme? If he has no talent for humor, can he stop trying to be funny? ? Stitching a few second-rate Internet jokes into the serious narrative really hurts the reader's perception 😡 The overall plot setting is also the kind of "you can know the follow-up after watching the beginning". It is not impossible for the protagonist to be a villain or a villain in his previous life, but to arrange this setting for the protagonist based on his revealed moral level is really "both upright and upright". What's more cool, doesn't the protagonist have any other abilities besides deceiving and abducting? ? It's not impossible to be a bad guy in the early stage, but you can't just write about the protagonist being opportunistic and cheating, right? ? ? ? ? (I can actually spray 450 words on a book, I admire myself)

These villains are so disgusting. They think about stealing the protagonist's luck, chance, and the so-called heroine every day. Are you a waste? You can't do anything without the protagonist, right? I can only say that pirates are more elegant than you. Which of those villains who are really well-shaped and have strong character is thinking about robbing the protagonist every day? Only the cannon fodder in third-rate novels can do this kind of thing. I don't like this kind of villain writing, so I can't comment on it.

At first glance, this resume shows that he is a protagonist with double standards. The villain whose demonic ways can be deeply rooted in people's hearts must be Master Gu, who is truly unscrupulous in order to achieve his goals.

The author can take a look at what he wrote 😥 and make the plot coherent.

Villains don't kill women, AI androids

If the villain needs to be aboveboard, he needs to have a set of reasonable logic. For example, if I want to write a villain, I will tell the villain that the world is about to be destroyed, so he must go to some extremes, kill and set fire to the gold belt, that is what he has to do. However, I don't kill indiscriminately, or I only kill what deserves to be killed, and I am the kind of thief who has good moral principles. If the villain wants to survive, he must give him a reason to live, for example, if he fails, he will have his bones and skin peeled off, etc. And this is only the first layer that can be seen. For example, if you are the eldest son of the family, if you die, the family will really be in chaos. Although you are a puppet, at least no one will oppose you on the surface. The third level is why the family is in conflict. You are a key point. Your death will make this conflict irreversible. This is the rationality aspect. As for the key characters not to be killed in advance, I will not use the reason that the children are still young, I will use the reason why humans do not kill children. Then tell the readers bit by bit why they can't be killed. This needs to be discovered by themselves. As for the protagonist, I will not let him be a hypocrite. He does have something different from ordinary people. For example, he will do things that only a fool would do, and he will get some luck because of this. The villain cannot do this because the focus of the two is not on the same aspect. The villain achieves his goal through curves, while the protagonist follows a straight line, so some plug-ins are needed to achieve reasonableness. But the villain doesn't need it. If you don't follow a straight line, it's just a cheat. The protagonist can't kill people and set things on fire. But for the villain, I have no choice but to kill people and set things on fire. Because, with this perspective, the villain is destined not to get some plug-ins, but on the contrary, the villain can seize some similar plug-ins The villain cannot seize completely righteous equipment. Don't expect the villain to use his personality charm to win the favor of those weapons. The most difficult part is that this requires digging. It is not just about brainwashing the equipment. It is equipment that has lived for thousands of years, which will definitely not work. For example, if you kill evil people to save good people, the weapon will probably think that you are a zz. First, why can you judge others? You are a villain and you are naturally unjust. Second, if you kill someone, you are a bad person. I should kill you first, so that you will not harm the good people. How does the villain survive in the later stage? I choose to be Song Jiang and surrender directly. If the protagonist is an upright leader, I will vote for the emperor to check and balance the protagonist. If the protagonist is the emperor, I will vote for the cabinet to check and balance the emperor. I will never be a prince and will not resolve conflicts. The protagonist understands himself in the later stage. If he does not kill you directly, he understands. There is an advantage to joining the cabinet. At least you can clear your side at any time. Anyway, the protagonist will definitely go berserk. When the time comes, you can jump left and right and jump directly to the protagonist's side. If the protagonist's evaluation of you is capricious, you can incite rebellion against loyal ministers. After all, those who openly want to appease you can continue to sway you at any time.

The villain writing is useless. . . . . . . . 6

Writing about villains and engaging in trash talk, I really don't know how to write the word "death"

This article is written in a rambling manner, with no logic or context. It focuses on an author writing whatever he thinks of. The transitions between characters are not smooth enough and are very stiff.

I don't understand what the author wants to write at all, and I feel that the author's settings are contradictory. Every time the simulator simulates it, the world line will change. Then, without doing anything, the protagonist will have a life-or-death feud with the Son of Destiny who had no enmity in the first place. Then, what's even more outrageous is that after the protagonist knows that the simulator will cause the world line to change, he still uses it, but he still can't grab the opportunity. What is the use of this simulator? What is the difference between the protagonist's behavior and being addicted to online DB? Sweet, why are all the books on drug guide these days? The protagonist has obviously traveled through time and has only one life, but the result is that he behaves like he is playing a single-player game.

At present, it seems that the protagonist is a pure cannon fodder villain, with all the necessary traits and poisonous points. For example, he treats people poorly, has zero communication skills, behaves erratically, does things without a plan, is not cautious, and likes to take risks. Please help me if you're about to die, Mr. Simulator. This simulator is already poisonous because it can communicate. It's even harder to rely on the simulator for everything. To put it simply, the setting is too complicated, the protagonist's character is too confusing, and the supporting role arrangement is too complicated. Firstly, there is no sense of immersion, secondly, it is not enjoyable, and thirdly, the logic is flawed and it cannot be read as a biography. It's good for the author to practice his skills. When writing this book, it's better to save it on time and read it yourself before posting it.

. . . Why does the male protagonist grab the female partner's pearls as soon as he comes on board?

If a person says that his writing is messy, it can be said to be his own problem. Many people say that it is the author's own problem. I think it's ready to be cut, so don't waste time.

A bunch of typos, written by AI, but still reluctant to check?

It's not recommended three times a day. I'm really unimpressed by it.