I'm the Dauphin in France

It's a pretty good farming story with a French background in the late 18th century. The writing on diplomacy is actually above average, with intricate relationships between different countries directly entangled for a few interests. In terms of politics, because he was born as a prince, he decided to accept it without having too many personal belongings in his head. Although there are no details on the development of the Association for Science and Technology in terms of economics, the summary is pretty good and does not expose the shortcomings of lack of knowledge. The Golden Finger Index is acceptable. But there are also many shortcomings. For example, the Tunisian colony used the Roman Empire as its national identity. I am not sure whether it is a joke or a sincere feeling. The anti-French alliance at the back and the previous chapters of dumping goods are not very good.

Why is this single update 1,000 words long?

Internally, we support the capital aristocracy to check and balance the feudal aristocracy, support industrial development, open a central bank, and balance labor, capital, and royal power; externally, we colonize Tunisia and promote the narrative of the French-Roman remnants in North Africa, trying to assimilate Tunisia, befriend Russia, and intervene in Italy, which can only be said to be very similar to Nazis

"I Was a Crown Prince in France" Tianhaishan ➠ Start reading© {"TopicId":"586286831142961152","TopicName":""}{"TopicId":" 995701360950116352","TopicName":"Amway Famous Scene"}{"TopicId":"909952577470070784"," TopicName":"One sentence short comment activity"} {"LinkId":"32089","LinkName":"2025 double monthly ticket activity starts! ","LinkUrl":"QDReader://ataru. Qidian. Com/noah/321180584"}

In the first stage, we claimed that the author has not posted any updates; In the second stage, we said that the author may have updated, but we should not subscribe now; In the third stage, we said maybe we should subscribe, but I can't do anything without book coins; In the fourth stage, we regretfully announced that we should have subscribed in time, but it is too late now.

I spent one night reading the love novel "Crison and Eugenie" written by Emperor Napoleon when he was young - a masterpiece of humor and obscenity written in his early years. Napoleon has always looked down on novels, and it can even be said that he hated them. After all, in his eyes, novels are "maid reading" and are not worthy of "big men" wasting their time. However, in his early years, he secretly fished while working and wrote a novel that can be called a secondary autobiography. And this critical creation based on himself and his first love allows us to have a glimpse of his "secondary soul" when he was young. Let's talk about the plot first. The protagonist of the story, Krison, is a genius who was born for the battlefield (let me introduce myself), with a cold but kind-hearted character, and quickly rises to the top by virtue of his military exploits and personal charm (gosh, this is me). However, what he pursues is not only glory, but also an idealized love. He met the pure Eugenie and fell into a vigorous love. Not only did he fall in love at first sight, but he also committed to each other for life, and finally lived in a farming-style "world for two." But destiny cannot be violated. Crison left his family again for the sake of his motherland. He gained victory on the battlefield, but he was cuckolded at home. Eugenie fell in love with a "warm" adjutant, which directly turned Crison into a lovelorn general on the battlefield. The minotaur drama in this novel caused Cresson to fall into the big emo of life. In the end, he chose to let "thousands of ruthless bullets penetrate his body" (I'm a metal storm, thousands of flintlock shot balls passed by and this person was directly turned into dumpling stuffing. I'm afraid the author doesn't have any military knowledge 🈚 🐶 🐶 🐶), and came to the final curtain call of a "loyal hero". When Napoleon wrote this paragraph, he may not have thought that the bloody plot of the novel would be replicated in real life - more than once - one of his relationships and two marriages collapsed due to cheating and extramarital affairs. It seems that "Tauren Humanities" is really a metaphor of fate. Of course, we have to admit that "Crison and Eugénie" is in many ways Napoleon's secondary autobiography: all the advantages of Clisson are like the labels that the young Napoleon put on himself, a battlefield genius, an affectionate hero, and a brave martyr. And that kind of overly idealistic love is like the catharsis of his "sexually repressed literature" when he was a young virgin. However, Napoleon really did what most male protagonists in novels cannot do: the work he did later was much crueler than in the novel. In the final analysis, Napoleon's literary talent is not very high. His novels are clumsy, blunt and streamlined. Some of the fragments are embarrassing to watch, and they are comparable to the second grade essays I wrote in junior high school. I deeply suspect that Nahuang's disdain for novels is because he failed in writing novels, so he was incompetent and furious. He said grapes were sour because he couldn't eat the grapes, and he criticized novels as inferior if he couldn't write novels well. But who would have thought that this young literary virgin who lay on the table and critically read "The Sorrows of Young Werther", a romantic novel about male and female love, seven times, would later become the ruler of Europe and discuss the plot with Goethe himself, the author of "The Sorrows of Young Werther"? (And made a violent comment: Werther should not have committed suicide at all. Faced with the emperor's violent comments, Goethe, who was a little embarrassed, said: Maybe the novel should not have an ending) Perhaps this is the charm of Napoleon: he fantasizes himself into a perfect person who cannot exist, which is called the second grade, but the one who can do what he says is the emperor. (Now is fantasy time🤣👉 The author nb is actually real😯 Wait why even the Minotaur is real🤯) If Desiree and Bonaparte got married, and the two really settled in an old castle with a big garden (the plan in Bonaparte's letter), there might not be a future Napoleon (Thanks to Desiree, her brother asked for more betrothal gifts). Good luck and bad luck depend on each other, no one knows what is waiting for you in the future. (It is suspected that Napoleon was born with wife control + cuckold addiction... Josephine was the kind of romantic wife who fascinated Napoleon) Finally, I have to joke that Talleyrand read this masterpiece in front of Napoleon. It is estimated that Napoleon could have dug out a Tuileries Palace on the floor with his toes. Ps: Napoleon thought that novels were "maid reading", but he also read novels, so Napoleon always thought of himself as a maid.

If I were a European country, I would also fight France. If I lose, there will be no losses. The captives will come back. The compensation will be very small. It will be divided into ten years. If I don't want to pay it back, I will find an excuse to launch another attack. Prussia, Russia, Austria and the United Kingdom will not lose any land, and there will be no deterrence at all. If I win and gain huge gains, there is no reason not to fight. In this case, Pig's Foot will only face the anti-French wars launched by the United Kingdom again and again.

However, I suggest marrying a Russian princess. Only the Tsar is the most steadfast guardian of the orthodox monarch. Moreover, France and Russia are far apart, which is in line with the principle of distant relations and close attacks.

I thought of a plot about using one's own flesh to overcome the disaster of the people. The protagonist performs a play. The protagonist comes out to distribute relief food. Seeing the miserable life of the people, he is heartbroken and unable to control his emotions. He cuts off a piece of his own flesh and throws it into the relief pot. Then he makes a speech: Seeing the suffering of his people, he is heartbroken and wishes he could save the whole people with his own body. Now he is using his own flesh to tide over the people. I will do my best to help the people tide over the difficulties at all costs, blah blah blah... By gaining prestige, aura, and the Holy See's momentum, he can become a contemporary saint.

Regardless of the fact that they faced different situations, 16 actually did better than 15 and 14. 14'S ten rooms and nine empty houses did not defeat Spain in the end. The damage caused by the North American War of Independence to the British was real. And in fact, the cost of fighting the 16th War of Independence was much lower than that of the 14th Grand Alliance and the War for the Spanish Crown. And compared to 15 and 16, 14 can be said to be living saints, loyal and frugal. These two do not allow religious freedom and are the absolute opposite of Catholicism. Furthermore, 16 was the first person to realize that the core of rule could never be placed in Paris. 16 Was not as good at foreign affairs as a man from the Capetian family. The Girondins also inherited his ideas. Parisians were absolutely unreliable. (If there is a referendum, it is hard to say who will be guillotined. Many old farmers from other provinces still recognize iris flowers.) But doing good things for foreign countries will lead to loss of interests in Paris. The method of the Louis 16 plan is to reduce taxes for Parisian people by increasing taxes on the aristocrats and stabilize the people's hearts. But it's obvious that he's not 14 and doesn't have that ability. 16 is the kind of person who has no talent or determination but has ability and patience. He knew what the people wanted, but he had to think for a long time before agreeing, and then regretted it after agreeing. It was embarrassing to suppress him. In fact, when the Bastille was captured, there were 2w5 troops in Paris. They directly ordered the suppression and the matter was over

If France wants to become a world hegemon, it must capture Africa. Africa is close to the mainland and can be localized. It captures North Africa first, and then prepares quinine in advance. In fact, other countries cannot seize other parts of Africa. The black people above are sold to the colonies of the United States and Spain. After the grain bureau crisis is resolved, births must be encouraged. Historically, the French also wanted to localize their colonies in North Africa. The reason why they failed was that the population was not enough, and the locals also needed people. There were too few French people in North Africa. At that time, France's fertility rate was already very low and there was no chance. So, they colonized North Africa first, and when the number of French people in North Africa exceeded half, they colonized the rest of Africa. Part of it is the localization of North Africa. During this period, the number of indigenous people must be reduced through various means, such as selling to the colonies of the United States and Spain. It is also a routine to wait for other African areas to reach the standard. The black people must be removed. Assimilation is too difficult. When Africa is localized, other areas must also be colonized. After all, The development of colonies that cannot be localized can also be accelerated, such as Australia, Indochina, Persia, etc., And the Arabian Peninsula must also be captured. Following Africa will make it easier to manage. Just wait until the Ottomans are weak. The peninsula has the least population, so there is no rush to capture it. The oil will not be used for a while. In fact, the most ideal situation is to unite with Spain. In this way, there will be colonies and the control of Africa will be stronger. Then let Spain swallow Portugal and seize the Austrian lowlands and the area west of the Rhine for easy defense. This is the most perfect state. The prerequisite for achieving this is that the population is sufficient. Many, while the French are still willing to have children, we must let them have children crazy. After the colony is established, the price of food will be suppressed so that they can afford to eat. When they grow up, they will be sent to Africa. France's current population is about 30 million, and it aims to more than double in ten years. It is not localized. In more than ten years, the newborns will be adults by then, and they can be sent to complete localization. In this way, it needs to be accelerated after the first dozen years. After all, the population base is larger and more people will grow, and localization will become faster and faster in the future. In this way, North Africa, West Africa, East Africa, and South Africa will come one by one, and they can be sucked in midway. People from other European countries can do it faster. At this time, many European countries are overpopulated. These people basically go to the United States, where their beards can be cut off and assimilation is easy. Black people in Africa are sold directly. Black slaves are not cheap at this time and they can make a lot of money. Anyway, everyone is doing it at this time.

She was too young at that time and didn't know that all the gifts given by fate had already been marked in secret.

Nowadays, the rules of the book review area are corrupt and traitors are everywhere. This is due to the lack of updates. If the author diligently updates one hundred thousand words every day, then the traitors will be afraid and retreat, and the moral gentlemen will rejoice. This is a feat worthy of praise by Yao and Shun! I have heard that calves born in sheep pens do not behave like sheep when they grow up. You are at the starting point and your computer keyboard is often used, but you have lost interest in updating it. Is this reasonable? The reason why Qidian is strong is that we have inherited the etiquette and skills of our ancestors. Stop bursting, the pressure has nowhere to release, and instead you become tired. Isn't this the same as abandoning the roots of the tree and pursuing the treetops? If this continues, great disaster will surely happen! The reason why Bai Jin can have tens of thousands of royalties and not be harmed by villains is because they are willing to listen to what upright gentlemen say. However, Poujie cannot get royalties and is even looked down upon by his girlfriend. This is because they are close to evil villains. I hope you can think carefully about the difference. There is one thing for which the author can cry bitterly, and six things for which the author can sigh. Since ancient times, when performing actions, the words are often very passionate. If they are not passionate, they will not be able to move the actor's heart. Harsh words are akin to slander. Author, you should think carefully about whether such a thing is right or wrong. Those authors who updated less, delayed, or missed updates had no time to feel sad about themselves, so they were drowned in the torrent of works, leaving only later authors to feel sad about them; later authors felt sad and did not learn from it, and future authors felt sad about it.

You can try to write about major power diplomacy, such as the Three Emperors Alliance and the Anti-French Alliance. There is no history of such major power alliances in Chinese history, and few people have written about it. Farming to develop the Industrial Revolution and then fighting the whole of Europe is not as interesting as fighting an alliance of great powers. Encourage the French population to have children, upgrade Napoleon's continental blockade policy, and the new United States. There are many nodes to write about 🙂 Another one is that the royal family did oppress the French people at that time, and the protagonist needs to make some separation from the traditional royal family 🙂

The nobility and the church are not good things, but the emerging capital of industry and commerce is good. These guys are even less trustworthy than the old aristocracy. Whether they are the compromising constitutional monarchs or the duplicitous Girondins, they are just chameleons asking for power from the king. When the royal family dominates the country, it is better to learn from Germany and Japan, and adopt the form of state monopoly capital to control the economic lifeline and government, and the royal family controls or owns most of the state monopoly capital.

It is recommended that the author not prevent the chaos from happening. In this once-in-a-lifetime feast, all parties, both domestic and foreign, are players at the table. As the orthodox heir of Bourbon, the crown prince has much richer cards than the others, not to mention that you know the path to travel through. First of all, the Bourbon family has its own interests and demands, which are completely inconsistent with the old aristocratic church, the third estate, the sans-culottes and even the orthodox monarchs of Europe. The history of the original time and space has proven that whether it is the Turge reform or the negotiations of the Estates-General, the mess left by Louis XIV cannot be dealt with at all. , And the conflict of interests of all parties cannot be reconciled, so it is meaningless to rely on paper craftsmen to put out fires everywhere to maintain the old order. Moreover, this old order not only leaves some dignity to the royal family, but the substantial benefits are taken by others. It is undoubtedly a fantasy for the royal family to use gentle means to take back most of the power and wealth to consolidate the royal power. The big battle is an opportunity to reshuffle the cards. Whether it is to use a knife to clear away the parasitic rice bugs that are difficult to deal with, clear up the stubborn obstacles that block the way, expose and identify the prickly heads who are secretly dissatisfied with the royal family, or give the peace dogs a profound education, which the paper painter cannot achieve. In the end, you, the savior, clear the stage and stage the return of the king. All problems that hinder progress can be solved in one go, just in time to clean the house and treat guests. The mob and speculators march for the king, and you pull off the list to gain the reputation of a benevolent emperor. So not only can we not stop it, but we must also add fuel to the flames and fan the flames from behind. Try our best to take advantage of the fire of this major incident and slowly strengthen our core strength. However, we must pay attention to controlling the direction and not letting the fire burn us. Give up some flashy things. False status and wealth don't matter, Louis the Equality just wanted to speculate for the Orleans family to obtain the throne. The pattern was too small, and the Bourbon crown prince wanted more. This was a large-scale fishing scene, not only with domestic fish, but also fish from the anti-French alliance. Richelieu means more to France than Louis XIV and Napoleon; if the French army did not surrender in World War II, the last man would not be able to appear, so the Crown Prince should copy their homework.

I want reform but not revolution, and with Cixi above my head, I'm just treating the symptoms rather than the root cause. I've read 300 chapters, and it's so good. I don't know what's going to happen next.

Author, your novel is too delayed, right? It's chapter 550. The protagonist has not yet ascended the throne of France, and the territory he has expanded is only an African land. How long do you plan to write in this novel? Isn't it possible that the protagonist will still be the prince in Chapter 700? It seems that the author plans to write this novel to 2000 chapters.

The handling of women's issues gives me a headache. Do I have to speculate on this stock? A lot of foreshadowing and then no, making enemies everywhere in the void? And the French royal family didn't humiliate Austria, right? How come the prince and concubine are so popular?

Another highlight of this book is that the food is eaten according to the natural frontier. The territory I went to is not too beautiful. The surrounding area is a vassal, plus the direct territory along the coast of North Africa. It is simply better than the territory in some works that makes dogs shake their heads.

We all know that the Earth's zero meridian is the meridian where the Greenwich Observatory outside London is located, but few people know that historically Britain and France have fought over the zero meridian, an important world rule and geographical concept that affects world transportation, shipping, international trade, and even aerospace and military fields. Many countries have advocated using their own local time zone as the international standard, but they must consider that the 180-degree longitude behind the earth, the prime meridian, is the date line. If the date line passes through certain places where humans live, but the local time is divided into two days, then this is definitely not a good plan. For example, if our capital Beijing or the U. S. Capital Washington is used as the zero degree longitude, then its corresponding date line will pass through South America and the hinterland of our country, which will definitely bring disadvantages to local operations. So the only suitable sites left were Britain and France. Their longitudes are similar, and their back longitudes correspond to the no-man's land in the center of the Atlantic Ocean. Setting up a date line here will not cause too much of a problem. Therefore, at the 1884 International Longitude Conference that determined the zero-degree longitude, France was the only country to vote against the selection of Greenwich in the United Kingdom as the site of the zero-degree longitude. Later, it did not recognize its status for a long time and still used its own Paris time. In the world line of this book, France's absolute world dominance is even greater than that of Great Britain in reality. Therefore, there is a high probability that this world will use the site proposed by France as the zero longitude to define world standard time. Finally, I will use AI to introduce you to the detailed history: Background: Time confusion and the need for standardization Before the 19th century, all parts of the world were based on local solar time ("local time"). However, with the development of railways, telegraphs and ocean shipping, time confusion in cross-regional collaboration became increasingly serious. For example, while U. S. Railroads used hundreds of places, European countries also had confusing timetables due to differences in longitude. Since the 1850s, the United Kingdom has taken the lead in using London's Greenwich Observatory (GMT, Greenwich Mean Time) as its national unified time; France has long used Paris Mean Time (PMT), which is 9 minutes and 21 seconds earlier than GMT (later adjusted to 50 minutes slower). ------ Britain's first-mover advantage: the establishment of the Greenwich System Britain relied on the technological advantages of the Industrial Revolution and global colonial hegemony to actively promote time standardization. The Greenwich Observatory, established in 1675, has become a central reference for navigation (its authority was established by the Longitude Act of 1714). In 1847, British railways fully adopted GMT; in 1855, the British Parliament legislated for the use of GMT nationwide. At this time, GMT had spread throughout the world through the telegraph network and became the de facto international time. ------ 1884 International Longitude Conference: The competition heated up In 1876, Canadian engineer Sandford Fleming proposed the "global 24-time zone system" and called for the division of time zones based on an international prime meridian. This initiative promoted the International Meridian Conference held in Washington in October 1884. The focus of the meeting was the location of the Prime Meridian. The main competitors include: • Britain: Advocates Greenwich (which has extensive practical basis); • France: Proposes the Paris Observatory or "zero longitude should pass through the ocean without territorial disputes"; • Brazil: Proposes Ferro Island in Spain; • The United States: Supports Greenwich initially, but later turns neutral due to diplomatic considerations. After intense debate, the French representative objected on the grounds that "Greenwich is too tilted towards the Atlantic", but in the end the meeting voted 22 in favor, 1 against (France), and 2 abstentions to establish Greenwich as the prime meridian and GMT as Universal Time (UT). The French delegation refused to sign and issued a statement emphasizing that it "retains its own time sovereignty." ------ France's Resistance and Compromise: The Struggle for "Paris Time" After the meeting, France did not immediately accept GMT. "Paris Mean Time" (PMT) is still used in official documents, and the difference from GMT is marked on the map (+0h09m21s, adjusted to GMT-0h09m21s after 1901). Folks call GMT "British time" (l'heure anglaise) and deliberately avoid recognizing its international status. This resistance continued until the beginning of the 20th century: • In 1911, French law recognized GMT as "French Auxiliary Time" (Heure d'Etat) for the first time, but still stipulated that civil time was GMT+0h09m21s (later simplified to GMT+10 minutes); • In 1919, after the end of World War I, France adjusted civil time in order to integrate into international cooperation. Is GMT+0 (in actual use, Paris time is still used); • In 1929, France completely abandoned its independent time system and officially adopted GMT as the legal standard (but civil time is still 1 hour ahead of GMT, which is later Central European Time, CET, UTC+1); • In 1978, after France joined the EU, it fully adopted UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) to complete its integration with international standards. ------ The nature and impact of the competition The dispute between Britain and France reflects the struggle between the great powers for the power to formulate global rules at the end of the 19th century: Britain relied on technological advantages and existing practices to try to promote its standards into global norms; France tried to maintain its own scientific tradition (the Paris Observatory was once the center of European astronomy) and cultural independence. In the end, the British solution won out due to its practicality and wide acceptance, and Greenwich became the "origin" of global time. This process also promoted the birth of the modern time zone system - although the 1884 meeting did not force countries to adopt time zone systems, it laid the foundation for subsequent global time standardization. Today, UTC (based on atomic clocks) has replaced GMT, but the Prime Meridian is still anchored in Greenwich and has become an important symbol of British historical heritage.

I just can't understand why you don't want to cede land and insist on economic colonization. If your homeland is not big enough, how can you get economic colonization? No matter how much the protagonist cheats to move technology over, but the homeland is not enough and only the colony is nothing, even assuming that before the protagonist dies, he can cheat to the colony and the homeland and can always communicate with him. If there is no homeland, it is nothing. If nothing else, if you only have this little homeland and you have a colony and a hammer, how are you going to fight the United States? Even if the author wants to create a European community dominated by legal currency, you will definitely have to have French troops sweep across Europe in the end, otherwise this community will definitely not be built. But before that, the more local and populous you must be, the better. As for the author's insistence on ceding national consciousness, I feel that it is nonsense. Does he think that awakening national consciousness has anything to do with you? Just classify it as a French occupation. As for the people inside, that doesn't matter. Just send troops there first. At least it will be legal. On the surface, it should be French land. As for the people here, you don't care about them. Directly issue a policy. If they want to leave, they can leave. If they don't leave, pull them down. Anyway, as long as they don't attack this place. They love the French garrison, and what does this have to do with national awakening? Isn't it normal for countries to cede land? Why do people run to the United States after World War II? Isn't it because the United States is rich? Isn't this different when France becomes stronger after the protagonist's reform? As a result, the author insists on doing some economic colonization. As long as your land is large enough, you will have a lot of space to operate. If you don't have land, you only have a hammer to use for economic colonization. But if one day France weakens, then the so-called economic colonization will not be able to do the army no matter how economical it is. But if you have a lot of land, you will have a lot of space to operate. As a result, you have fought against the Anti-French Alliance twice now, and you will not let the opponent abdicate. This is understandable. After all, forcing the opponent to abdicate is part of France is just recovering and can't do this. It's understandable to force Napoleon not to attack. After all, in a few years, France may not be able to fly anymore. But if you don't even want to cede territory, I'm really tired. Besides, before World War II, Europe was always on the road of ceding territory. Why can't you see what you said about national consciousness being difficult to manage without ceding territory? At least before the establishment of the modern structure, it was possible to boil the frog in warm water and slowly expand the territory. It was tolerable enough. Napoleon was able to sweep across Europe directly. Now with the protagonist reform, he is even more capable of sweeping. It is equivalent to sweeping the opponent directly and then slowly delaying the defense against Russia to resolve internal conflicts. Or it can be more stable and wait for a few years. After France becomes stronger under the protagonist reform, it can boil the frog in warm water and slowly accept the cession of territory. Then it will not directly sweep Europe like Napoleon and then France will face the internal conflicts of the whole of Europe. If it only accepts ceding territory, it will not be as big as the whole of Europe. It has time to slowly resolve the conflicts of ceding territories. As a result, the author insists on not ceding territory. Normally Napoleon swept across Europe. Now you tolerate it. You can directly attack the capital of the opposite side, but you also tolerate it. The other side does not have a long memory and negotiates peace. Then there is another anti-French alliance. However, now you issue a "Declaration of Human Rights" and directly explode the troops and kill the opponent. Why don't you still cede the territory? Now I wonder if the monarch opposite is thinking, "This French fool, our country is almost gone and we haven't ceded the land yet." Damn it, I can't complain anymore. If you insist on not ceding the land, you can just boil a frog in warm water and slowly accept the ceding of the land. Then wait a few years when France becomes stronger and sweeps across Europe to build the European Community, and then cede the land and support a few more The puppet government will be finished. As for this country, when the United States rises, what will you use to attack it? The more land, the better. Now, let the opponent with fewer provinces be too wary of France. After a while, France will fully rise and then sweep across Europe. Let them cede territory and build an European Community. It will be perfect. Then go and grab the Middle East and it will be basically stable.

Now the writing is getting worse and worse, there are fewer and fewer scenes about the protagonist, and there is no plot about France. In fact, plots about foreign countries are omitted. What impact does it have on the overall story? Writing about Ciel is not as interesting as writing about the protagonist's mistress.

It's really good. There was no peeing throughout the whole process. It's been a long time since I could read this kind of book in one sitting. It's such a good book. It's a pity that the threshold for European themes is a bit high, otherwise the results would be better

The author has written all kinds of details well, in detail without being sloppy, and the plot rhythm is not sluggish either. The key point is that the author has a very good attitude and is willing to communicate with readers. The writing style is at least very fluent. It is absolutely top-notch and worth reading.

Write slowly. Don't rush. Write another 1 million words and it will be a masterpiece. One of the best books on European themes!

It really fits the title. It's so perverted that he became the crown prince with more than three million words.

Isn't Queen Maria Carolina of Naples the best sister to Marie Antoinette? Historically, she rebelled against the Fa because her beloved sister was beheaded by Lao Luo. And Naples and Sicily are part of the Bourbon dynasty

Carry the vigorous integration of Western Europe through to the end! 👊😡😤

Alexandra