I Have a Gate to Myriad Worlds

I don't know what the author's original intention was in writing the book. Is it written for readers, or is it written for myself? If it is written for myself, there is a higher probability that few people will appreciate it. Writing for readers is to cater to readers and the market. It is destined not to forcefully deny other people's opinions. You have to read both the good and the bad. I have to bear it all, It's so contradictory. I want everything, but I don't want to accept anything. I want readers to cater to the author and let readers accept it. Have you ever thought about a possibility? When the author screens out the niche group, the public group also screens out you. Why do you think the public does not accept it? At the same time, it is you who does not accept the public.

So the protagonist can move air conditioners from modern times, why not move ultraviolet lamps? Just use one manpower to chase the demons and kill them, and that's it. Give the demon slayer team the funds.

If a book can have a large number of words and at the same time a high popularity index and a large number of comment sections, it may not be a masterpiece, but if it fails to achieve either of the latter two, it must be a piece of cake💩

I looked at the recent comments and chapters again, and found no improvement. The author is still immersed in his own world, but he thinks that he wrote it according to the requirements of others, because he tried it according to the requirements of some people who conformed to the author's wishes, so no one is allowed to evaluate him, even if it is really a bit questionable. Question, you are not qualified. What the author writes is what the author thinks. I am me, different fireworks, The unselected part of the readers is not important. Then you have chosen the wrong subject and track. What is the difference between this and a blind date in a boxing group, except that what is said is what is said, After that, you still feel that everyone does not understand you and is just a mortal. You have no problems at all, but you always wonder why others are so annoying. In my eyes, the author is like this. The environment is wrong, the approach is wrong, and he blames everyone all day long. Later, he turns his grief and anger into strength, and lets himself pua. I continue to work hard, but my efforts are in the wrong direction. I can't adapt to myself without positive feedback. My approach is extremely contradictory to my heart. I want to be myself but then force myself to listen to others. I listen to others but don't listen to them all. I also deny what a group of people say. I feel that nothing I do is right. Sooner or later, my mentality will collapse.

(This explanation is only for some keyboard warriors, and does not affect serious readers and reasonable readers. As for the identity of each of you who are reading, please identify it yourself.) The content of this book accepts criticism, but does not accept groundless criticism. If you have a question, explain it with actual theoretical basis, and we will discuss its rationality, or you can explain where I am wrong. If the question does not affect the subsequent outline, then I will change it. You don't come up with a theoretical basis, and you don't explain where I wrote it wrong. You just open your mouth and say that this is unreasonable and that is unreasonable... If you pursue reasonableness, then you can time-travel yourself. What time-travel novels are you reading? There are also those who make wild remarks in the book review area without reading the content, saying that they don't want to read it after reading the introduction... Since you don't read it, what qualifications do you have to comment? You are worse than those trolls who pick on you after reading it! And some people say that there are too many flashbacks, too many plots in the original work, and too much popular science... There are only two or three flashbacks, and the total number of words is less than 2,000. The plot of the original work... The plot I wrote and the original work are not from the same period, okay? Science popularization... This is indeed a bit much, but this is mainly due to the fact that some readers have not read the original work, so science popularization is needed to lower the reading threshold, and also to prevent some people from using the details of historical knowledge as leverage (there are such people). There is also the issue of hydrology... Didn't you see the introduction? Some people also complained about the protagonist's name... What happened to Zhang San? Did Zhang San eat your rice? Some people also ask why the story takes place in Japan... You ask me about this kind of thing! Some people want to see modern technology crush ancient metaphysics... What? The technological side versus the mysterious side? I don't deny that the technology side is indeed very strong after the development, but to deal with things like metaphysics, you have to find ways to find weaknesses, not just enough firepower. If you really want to fight the mysterious side with heavy firepower, it is equivalent to using TNT to deal with Nie Xiaoqian - it will make you feel lonely. So, really don't mention this kind of appeal again! A world that can be crushed by science must be crushed by technology, but a world without technology should be crushed by metaphysics. In addition, if you are really free and have nothing to do, and you think what I wrote is really bad, you can write it yourself. I am optimistic about you. Maybe you will be the next platinum master? Stop torturing me as a young author. I just want to write the works I like and get high. There is no need to hold me back all the time. Besides, I have to code every day, so I really don't have the time to argue with you on the Internet - If you keyboard warriors want to find a sense of presence, please find another place.

How can I put it, I'm not very picky. Some people say that I can't stand Under One Person and Genshin Impact, but I don't have this problem. But author, I don't pick the subject matter, so you have to write well. The writing by one person is too poor. You just showed this to the brothers? As for Genshin Impact, really, you are either a cloud player or you have not read the plot carefully. There are a lot of errors and loopholes in the settings. I have also seen people picking these, so I won't repeat them again. The main thing is that you sucked up the original sea of ​​​​fetus and turned into a dragon. Do you really know what the concept of the original sea of ​​​​fetus is? The source of life in Teyvat, if you suck up the source of life of a world, it will turn into a dragon... Then I think you can't turn into a dragon but eat up a galaxy?

The setting of this book is okay, but it's a bit uncomfortable as soon as you enter. An orphan in the peaceful era has fought in the street and fought with black boxing. He has never killed anyone. Although he killed two ghosts as soon as he entered, he can actually threaten the pillar-level swordsman with a crossbow. His strength It is bigger than the Flame Pillar that has practiced the breathing method (although it has been strengthened), and its fighting ability is stronger than the Flame Pillar. Are you kidding me? The only difference between a Pillar-level swordsman who has passed the Pillar-level trial of killing the twelve ghost moons and completed a large number of tasks and ordinary people is that he can use a sword?

To be honest, I don't care if the author writes about Genshin Impact, but do you want it to be exciting? Since writing about Genshin Impact means big scenes, being the Riddler can be fun for everyone, so how did the author write it? Tianli was defeated at the beginning and then Fontaine was defeated continuously. The characters that appeared were the Duke, Villette and the nurse Meiluxin from Petersburg. The protagonist Fulina appeared once in the beginning and was invisible throughout the whole process. She played tricks with a group of prison minions NPCs throughout the whole process. Who cares? Is it worthy of the Teyvat fanatics mentioned in your chapter?

Why do you have to write about one person and the original god, and one person and the original god? I really don't want to read it. You have written about the little master.

Is there 10% alcohol in the Edo period? If you pour it on someone, it will burn. This is not gasoline, brother.