The Legend of Qin: The Six Arts of the Nobleman

Personal opinion, let's discuss it rationally (thank you everyone) There would be no 2,000-year-old Confucianism, but there would also be the so-called "Confucianism" of Legalism, Taoism, and military strategism. Confucian culture was derived from history and was the inevitable result of the mission undertaken by the Confucian predecessors themselves. From our current point of view, Confucianism has always been bad > good. But you must remember that we view this so-called Confucianism from the pinnacle of sound philosophy, morality, and law. (It's so pitiful. Who would have thought that 20 years ago, my family would have to wait a long time for some fatty meat. At that time, my mother would cook chicken drumsticks during the Chinese New Year. I can't forget the taste now.) Two thousand years, how long it is. It was enough to finish all the other three ancient civilizations, and most other ethnic groups were extinct. China is still here. The descendants of Yan and Huang are still here. The teachings of our predecessors and the wisdom of our ancestors are still shining brightly. Confucianism is just a name. We analyze its essence. In the final analysis, the so-called "Confucianism" is the unified concept of China, and this concept itself represents the Chinese people. It is a cultural representation and a spiritual atmosphere created by the Chinese. The name is just a symbol. If we change it, we can also say "Legalism" or "Moism". Many of our young comrades and big comrades, you analyze and look at the problem from the wrong angle. Still have to read more and of course discussions are good. But when dealing with our predecessors, the wisdom of our ancestors, and the history we don't know, I think we should treat so-called thoughts with caution and analysis. Confucianism has both good and bad qualities. There is no need to completely deny it, but it is necessary to take its essence and discard its dross. Let me say something, maybe some comrades don't agree. There is no so-called Confucianism, and without thousands of years of development, everyone is just an object of slavery. After all, who would have thought that a graduate student would come from a family of farmers who had been digging for food for three generations and get a decent job. Of course, we should not attack each other or fight among ourselves. Just discuss it with everyone. Confucianism, Legalism, Taoism, military strategists, the predecessors of various schools have long since perished, and even the family has been accommodated. What remains is just a Chinese nation called "Confucianism", and now we are learning from, inheriting and developing this Chinese nation. Don't be led astray by marketing accounts. Think about our morality, benevolence, laws, systems, etc., Aren't they the essence of thousands of years? Although today's people see the moon in ancient times, they do not see the ancient people's profound learning. Which one of the two is right or wrong? Just a handful of loess body. Be more humble, read more, think more, think more, and practice more. That's it. I hope everyone will view it rationally and analyze it dialectically.

Confucian education is to turn smart people into slaves and work honestly for them. There are always people who don't understand. Our ancestors have long understood it during the Hundred Schools. That is to say, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty fell in love with Confucian education. Everyone learned from Confucianism and worked for him honestly. All the subsequent rulers followed his example and strengthened Confucianism. The most obvious one is the Qing Dynasty. It is 2023. There are no people who still feel that Confucianism is good.

Author, do you want to write about the world of Qin Shi Mingyue or simply write about history? If you want to write about Qin Shi Mingyue, just watch the entire anime. The later part of fighting the barbarians is really difficult. The inventions and methods you mentioned were indeed very powerful in history. However, in the Mingyue of Qin Dynasty, the whole body was equipped with horse armor. Meng Tian had already encountered the Macedonian phalanx, Gongshu Transformers, Mohist super beast weapons, and even ancient versions of "tanks", not to mention the Big Mac built by Xu Fu when he went to sea in the later period. It would be very strange if you suddenly come to buy horseshoes, maddens and other gadgets, as well as earthen walls and wooden walls. Okay. You didn't write so many awesome things in Qin Shi Mingyue. Although the highlights (all kinds of beauties) are there, you can't just eat meat? I only see these at the moment. I will comment on new ones later.

Brother Kong is benevolent and righteous, Brother Meng is righteous and benevolent. Confucians, only etiquette is the way to go. A great Confucian should visit the seven kingdoms and submit to hundreds of schools.

I watched Qin Shi to watch the protagonist flirting with girls, not to watch historical wars. If I wanted to watch it, I would go to the historical fictional area to find it, okay? ? ? You have no idea who the readers of the Qin Dynasty fandom genre are. No wonder the Qin Dynasty written about is neither good nor bad, it deserves to be

I feel that the protagonist's character is too upright and too unselfish. Just like the tall and powerful characters in the past, he is a saint, not an ordinary person. The protagonist does not understand what ordinary people need, and he wants to make people desperate for just a little righteousness? It's like in ancient times, you brought a group of people without troops, paid them a basic salary, gave a speech to fight for so-and-so, and then the war was won. At least the economic, political and cultural development of Bingzhou must be developed, and it must be ahead of other countries in all aspects in order to retain people. Otherwise, if you swear not to go south and only focus on resisting the Huns, isn't this a hooligan? This is not the modern People's Liberation Army, and they are not an army that unifies the country. They are your personal subordinates. Since they are subordinates, you must bring them a better life and have hope. It is impossible for the general public to live a lifetime relying on slogans and dreams, not to mention the low literacy rate in ancient times. If you talk about righteousness and dreams with illiterate people, isn't this a hooligan? Too idealistic.

As a modern person, if you don't say anything about learning ancient thoughts, but if you fully abide by them, then more than 20 years of modern education have been wasted.

No heroine article! Disgusting! ! !

In fact, I am a little bit reluctant to watch Qin Shiming Yue because I watch the beautiful women and the protagonist accepting beautiful women. In my impression, Qin Shiming Yue is about swords, pure swordsmen, and a collision of ideas.

I don't know why so many people are crazy about Confucianism and the comprehensive development of morality, intelligence, physical education, art and labor. Although many schools do not have the strength to implement it, we still learn knowledge.