Hogwarts’ Pet Master

Although I like the heroine Hermione, if it weren't for me, I wouldn't say anything. At worst, I wouldn't watch it. But why are some people so aggressive? Some people are still disgusted with the removal of the cp, saying that they do not respect the original work. Does that mean they are also disgusted with changing the plot, are they still disgusted with the addition of secondary settings, are characters who do not deserve to die still have to die, and are disgusting guys allowed to continue to live well to suit your wishes. In my opinion, every fanfic I agree with is a re-evolution of the original world, not an extension.

Not to mention the heroine Hermione, I feel sick after watching it, and Hermione is not good-looking either.

The protagonist can take care of magical creatures independently. At least he must be very proficient in cleaning spells, flying spells and other life spells, right?

If possible, there is no need to get involved with the trio. Their stories are already familiar, and joining the protagonist will not change anything. Good fan fiction is based on the original work and tells the protagonist's own story. One of my favorites, Wind and Eagle Wings, is about writing his own story. The supporting characters are also original, and the trio basically does not appear.

Leave Hermione alone. . . It's a HP fanfic with the heroine Hermione. . . Buses are not that outrageous 😅

The reason why I don't like Hermione is simply because she owes a debt.

Hermione is great, but don't write her as a vase. Most people who think Hermione is not good as a heroine are because they see too much of Hermione in a vase. As a person who really likes Hermione, it's annoying to see them writing Hermione as a vase. It's best to strengthen Hermione. He deserves it.

The villain has appeared as a chess player so far. So far, soldiers, knights, bishops, and a suspected king have all appeared. Except for the king, the bishop is currently the largest, and he feels inferior to the professor in terms of strength. The professors here refer to Snape. The white-haired old man seems to be the king, but he may not be. I feel that his men should call him king instead of master. So far I have a deep prejudice against Scamander, who may be Dumbledore's old enemy, the first generation Dark Lord. But as we all know, the queen is the strongest in chess. Since they are all queens, she should be a woman. I am still very curious about her identity. Then there is the chariot that has not appeared so far. In chess, generally speaking, the bishop and the knight are the same. In this article, the bishop is larger than the knight. But the chariot is bigger than the two of them. It feels that it is at least on the level of McGonagall and Snape. And there is an operation called castling of the king's rook in chess. I feel that the author can design it based on this.

I couldn't stand it after reading Chapter 20 or 30. The protagonist said he was a time traveler, but he felt like a real child. What about being sniffed and stealing gold galleons, and playing tricks on Ron with the Weasley brothers? It seems that even the plot has been changed (Harry Potter failed to enter the academy at the beginning). In short, this book is not recommended, at least I can't stand it.

This plot of Xiuxiang is really speechless. I have raised a father. What is this?