Jingtai of the Ming Dynasty: I Am the Greatest Benevolent Emperor of All Time

It was a bit novel and expected at first, but later I found that the protagonist's behavior was not like that of an emperor, but rather like a ruthless official who had gained power. After more than seventy chapters, I felt that the protagonist was just wearing a tyrannical cloak, even a little timid, a bit like a blackened version of Jianwen Emperor Zhu Yunwen, who was difficult to achieve elegance.

The author may have some misunderstandings about tyrants. What the author wrote is not a tyrant. Isn't this a stupid king? Tyrants also have brains and skills. If you don't move, the emperor will just pick up a knife and kill people. The civil servants are also stupid. They are really waiting to be killed one by one. The protagonist is miserable, and Chongzhen is better than him.

I think a good book is one that makes readers happy and comfortable, or puts readers into an emotion. This book is considered a good book if it does this. Although it has flaws, at least there are no major logical problems. The book is good, everyone can read it.

Dufa died. The protagonist, the emperor, was really aggrieved. He could only be incompetent and furious, and could not kill anyone. The protagonist's inner treasury was stolen and the concubine in the harem was just poisoned. The chief assistant is summoned, and the chief assistant brings this dead man with him into the palace. When the chief assistant is talking to the protagonist, the dead man points the strung crossbow at the protagonist. After being discovered, the protagonist has no way to do anything with the first assistant, and does not dare to kill him. This is the emperor who just founded the Ming Dynasty for a hundred years. This happened in the third hundred years of the Ming Dynasty. The protagonist is unable to kill anyone he wants to kill, and remains in a rage of incompetence.

I have read one of the worst novels of the Ming Dynasty. The main character is cowardly and brutal, and he wants to kill this one and that one. It is now on the shelves. The emperor is fine, the prince, the queen mother, and Yu Qian are not dead. . . . This is a blood feud. His son was killed and he was left half alive. The protagonist is the biggest Madonna bitch.

The protagonist is completely neurotic. He only kills and kills violently. He seems to be unable to hold a pen, only a knife. How can someone like this be an emperor with absolutely no power at all? This is a historical novel, not fantasy! Not to mention the villain, I want to stab the protagonist and the God of War to death, let Zhu Jianshen succeed to the throne, and let Yu Qian assist the government. This may be a bit interesting.

The protagonist is too suspicious, too murderous, and his methods are too direct and brutal. When he first came through, no one trusted him. It is understandable to resort to violence to solve the problem. But now that he has certain rights, he is still so simple and crude, blindly breaking the unspoken rules of officialdom and the ancestral system. It is not that this is wrong, but it is a step too far. The protagonist is not an emperor like Zhu Chongba or Zhu Di who conquers the world. Even these two do not trust anyone except themselves like the protagonist. It's actually a paradox for the protagonist to be so suspicious. Whether it's the Imperial Guards or other intelligence agencies such as Ti Ban, they all give both kindness and power, and they give priority to kindness. Some emperors, like Jiaqing in the Ming Dynasty 1566, treat key figures such as the Thirteen Taibao as their godson. The protagonist is good and thinks it's useful, so he becomes a slave. If it's not useful, telling him to go away and leaving a note with his name is considered a gift. Don't talk about those emperors, huh. After just one or two words of greeting, he is really devoted to the emperor. That is because the emperor still has the cloak of sanctity. The protagonist is so unreasonable and does not follow the rules. He kills officials, clansmen, businessmen, and monks. He even thinks that he does not care about things like filial piety. According to the Ming Dynasty, no, in any dynasty, this kind of emperor will not live long. If you want someone who can be trusted, there will be no one who can be trusted. There needs to be checks and balances. There is no way to check and balance. (Repeat, the protagonist's indiscriminate suppression is not considered a way to check and balance. The way to check and balance is to give one side the leading right but not the reputation, and to give the other side the reputation but not the leading right. It is to artificially roughly divide the ruling party and the opposition party, just like the Yan Party and the Qingliu) A high-pressure policy like the protagonist's all-round, no blind spots and no difference is really looking for death. The divine right of kings can only be used to fool the people, and there is no need to look like eunuchs around you. Eunuchs are grateful for a little favor, but the eunuchs just have no other rights to settle down. If they have the right to kill their masters, they will never be more loyal than civil servants. For details, see the eunuchs who casually abolished the emperor in the late Tang Dynasty, such as the eunuchs around the cabinet ministers, including the six ministers and nine ministers. The emperor's sacred cloak is nothing to them. They meet every day. Who can't figure out the fact that everyone is an individual? Obedience to the emperor is nothing more than the effect of culture and system. The protagonist is better. Culture, let alone the system, does everything for himself. The emperor is the biggest vested interest in the feudal system. If you want to be like Zhu Yuanzhang, you can go to court with sand. There are many heads of people, but no one dares to raise an army to rebel. First of all, you must have absolute authority in the army. Secondly, the current ministers will either fight with you to conquer the world, or they were once your subordinates. And then there is no one in your family who can replace you on the throne. Zhu Chongba has the absolute authority of all aspects without blind spots, and as the founding monarch who breaks first and then establishes, Zhu Chongba has such a The absolute power of Zhu Di is the same, which is equivalent to fighting the world again. Even these two people, for civil servants who want to die, will first persuade them to kill them if they can't. If they were all like the protagonist, Yu Qian would not have the protagonist's turn to plot, and he would have sent it long ago. In the final analysis, in one sentence, the protagonist himself directly took off the coat of divine right of kings that was no longer glorious, and went around killing people like a madman. No matter how powerful the monarch is, he would still ask people to kill him. Secondly, he comprehensively suppressed all the vested interests and groups that allocate rights in the court, but the bones thrown to them were very few. Lian, but felt that as long as the power was distributed more finely, it would be a perfect check and balance. Secondly, it did not promote any new interest groups, but only restored a few special agents and spy agencies, and also let several agencies under it decentralize power. Really, I have seen different parties biting each other, ministers and eunuchs biting each other, but I have never seen eunuchs biting each other. The great power of Jin Yiwei lies in the clear integration of its structural system. The emperor is the main one, and then down layer by layer, the power is directly transferred from the highest point to the grassroots without any delay. The protagonist lets the secret agents fight dogs with each other. The entire organization is not monolithic. Can it be called a spy organization? ! Don't think that you are an emperor, and if you are scolded by the civil servants, you will just tear up your face and be shameless. As a successor monarch rather than the founding emperor, the system and shame are the foundation for your rule of the country. Of course, if you have an army, treat it like I didn't mention it, but if you really write in the later period and drag the army along with the protagonist to go crazy and kill officials everywhere, then there will really be no one else. You are not the founder of the country, so you are not the founder of the country. The sword will definitely be cut on your own neck. After all, those who dare to speak will be cut off by you yourself, and the rest will be just like that. After they cut off your head, sit on the throne, and there will be a great scholar to debate the scriptures for him. Civil officials are used to govern the country. Why do some people dislike the Manchus? First, they were barbarians at the beginning. Secondly, the Manchus were essentially slaves. The emperor used his own clansmen and servant families who directly obeyed him to control the officials and then rule the country. When ministers called themselves slaves in front of the emperor, it was a reward and an honor. This was something that was unthinkable before China. I see this trend among protagonists now. It should be said that it is being copied. After all, the Manchu Qing Dynasty had loyal servants, the Manqing bannermen, what do you have? You have chopped off a large section of nobles and vassal kings, broken the backbones of courtiers, and divided the secret service agencies that strive to centralize power like dogs. You have broken the bones of the slowly emerging bourgeoisie. You have exiled the monks who control the power of public opinion. You have suppressed the Confucian family, the holy place in the hearts of scholars in the whole dynasty, and you also plan to take off their sacred cloak. Who else can you rely on? Maybe it has a bit of reputation among the people. According to ancient productivity and ancient traditional concepts, you wouldn't expect that when these people who have finally been forced to endure it decide to make you soluble in water, those people will come over when they hear the news. 🤔 Even if they did come, you would have sent it long ago. Even if you really made a great contribution to the country and were famous all over the world during your lifetime, you will still end up like Qin Shihuang or Sui Yang Emperor. Don't think that it will be fine if you let Qi Julang write a nicer note for you in the history books. Stories like the light of the ax and the shadow of the candle will not be circulated for so long. The grudges of the literati class and the word-of-mouth mentality of folk gossip are not so easy to erase. Note that this is a personal opinion and can be discussed or refuted, but please don't be too harsh. If you criticize, you are right.

Regarding Yu Qian, I hope the author can have a clear head and know what he is doing. A country cannot be without national heroes, let alone stigmatize national heroes. Are you "restoring history", or are you making mistakes under the influence of the outside world? All history is contemporary history, because history affects current mankind and the current era. History is no longer about speculation, attachment and fabrication at this moment, it is all about the author's own writing! Speculation, attachment, can fiction be regarded as historical truth? I can do this. Can I also speculate that Yu Qian, as the person who must be eliminated as the restored emperor, will definitely try his best to win over the people around him, set up obstacles for his actions, and hinder him from being diligent as the king? Is this reasonable? Is this novel of yours intended to tell those inexperienced readers and let them spread word of mouth everywhere that Yu Qian is not a national hero, but a villain? Is it reasonable to beautify Qin Hui? All history is contemporary history, yes and no, no!

This book focuses on a useless person, and people are dumbfounded.

The garbage among the garbage, find someone to comment on it. This one can't be killed, that can't be killed. Is it still a good article? I agree with the article about surviving the start. After controlling a guard, you don't have no power or soldiers. Just like Brother Zheng in the early stage, he can't be killed (Besides, Brother Zheng has Lu Buwei to suppress others. Lu Buwei has real power and military power. Create an old master and have Lu Bu. Is Wei so powerful?) After Brother Zheng killed Lu Buwei, wouldn't he be the same as the protagonist now? Why can Brother Zheng kill you but not you? Kill a few people and write more than ten chapters. It took a long time to write and a few people died, but they were all civil servants and nobles. Does it make sense? The most damnable one is not dead. Chongzhen, who was the last to fall in the Ming Dynasty, wanted to kill whomever he wanted. If you can't, what kind of emperor do you want to be? Fan Guang is not yours?