Editing History: Ranking the Top Ten Emperors from the Start!

What's on this list? Why did Kangxi and Zhao Kuangyin make the list? Is it that I, Emperor Xuan of the Han Dynasty, am not worthy, or is it that Emperor Gaozong of the Tang Dynasty is not worthy? The two dozen or so people above are almost there. Why is Li Shimin higher than Zhu Yuanzhang and Liu Che?

It's Li Erchui again, forget it in the early stage, but Li Erhehe in the later stage, let alone his own children who are rebelling. The Tang Dynasty is obviously a military power, but it also sent out more than a dozen daughters to marry, and also gave away technology and culture. Tubo can be said to be the most threatening empire to the Tang Dynasty at that time. How did Li Shimin finance it? I failed miserably to defeat Goryeo. I really don't understand why so many people like to brag about Li Erqiangu Yidi.

Not to mention anything else, Li Er didn't kill the heroes, he didn't kill the admonishers, he didn't treat the people badly, he chose a suitable successor, and he expanded his territory. As for killing brothers, marrying brothers' wives, getting married, etc., Do you rank as a saint or as an emperor? If the emperor achieves the above five points, he is already invincible, right?

Fortunately, I read the comment section. The person on the list from the Qing Dynasty was actually Kangxi and not Yongzheng, so there is no need to read it. Kangxi, who closed his country in isolation, will be a sinner through the ages! I knew clearly that the West had begun to develop but still closed the country to the outside world, which later led to the Opium War and the modern tragedy of the Chinese nation.

It's so funny that they don't recognize the Yuan Dynasty but recognize the Qing Dynasty! The author tells me what is the difference between these two dynasties? What did the barbarian dynasty bring to China?

As soon as I saw the title of the book, I knew it was created by someone from the studio lj

This kind of fast food novel has been put on the shelves so early, I can't even tell the good or bad.

The Manchu Qing Dynasty also gave birth to Yongzheng, who was considered a good emperor.

I knew there would be a lot of noise in this kind of books, so I will tell you my opinion. The first Qin Emperor, the second Han Emperor Wu, the third Ming Emperor Zhu Yuanzhang, the fourth Tang Emperor Taizong Li Shimin, the fifth Ming Emperor Zhu Di, the sixth Han Emperor Liu Bang, the seventh Yang Jian, the eighth Song Emperor Zhao Kuangyin, the ninth Liu Xiu, the tenth Yongzheng, the eleventh Li Zhi, the 12th Liu Xun (Liu Xun is Liu Bingji) the 13th Liu Heng, the 14th Liu Qi, the 15th Zhu Zhanji, the 16th Li Yuan, the 17th Li Yan, the 18th Li Chen, the 19th Zhu Jianshen (don't listen to what others say, you have to see what he does), the 20th Song Renzong (to be honest, I don't like the posthumous title of Ren) No., If the posthumous title of Ren is somewhat meritorious, then the posthumous title of Xiao is completely nonsense. Xiao is completely the posthumous title of Yongjun. There is no merit or serious sin, but if a country does not progress, it will regress. This is a dangerous posthumous title. I don't understand why in ancient times, Xiao was turned into a beautiful posthumous title) I wrote it, to be honest, Qianlong is the person I despise the most. Qianlong had no achievements, but a lot of his faults. If Kangxi's achievements and faults were mixed, Qianlong was completely a mediocre king. He was similar to Zhu Youtang, Emperor Xiaozong of the Ming Dynasty, and even worse than Zhu Youtang. Kangxi's achievements can only be said to be average, and he had no martial arts at all. What about martial arts? To pacify the three feudal lords and destroy Obai? Haha, this is civil strife. When does civil strife count as merit? If the Three Feudatories were forced to rebel and still be considered as cutting off the vassal, then the destruction of Obai is completely nonsense. It is a model of a faint king. There were only two bright kings in the Qing Dynasty, Huang Taiji and Yongzheng. Without Huang Taiji, the Manchu Qing Dynasty could only be regarded as a tribe. It was Huang Taiji who turned the Manchu tribe into a country. This was Huang Taiji's achievement. The mediocre kings governed Qianlong and Jiaqing. They had no merit and no fault. , The other five were all faint emperors, Kangxi didn't want to comment, they had some merits, but they were so-so, and their crime was that they almost brought down the Qing Dynasty. If it weren't for a good son, the Qing Dynasty would have been destroyed in a hundred years. To be honest, I really don't want to make Qianlong a mediocre emperor. It's okay to say that he is a faint emperor. As soon as Qianlong came to the throne, he put the stall into his mother's house and deposed him. Did he do this before his father's body was cold? What a good son

As a pseudo-historical buff, I think it's quite fun to read without thinking too hard. If you look at it with your brain, you will vomit blood.