One Piece: The Knife-Selling Vagabond of East Blue

Why three-sword style? I prefer the kind where one sword can overcome all obstacles; flashy styles are just flashy and have no appeal.

Reading the last paragraph of the synopsis made me feel like I was being cheapened, and I instantly lost interest in reading further. It also seemed a bit presumptuous and one-sided. ① Where will the funding for the Navy come from after its independence? How many years does it take Akainu to become Fleet Admiral? The protagonist, with his system, should be around 20-30?

Sure, not bad. I thought the Hawkeye part was good. After all, someone who can become the world's greatest swordsman is definitely not stupid; they should possess keen observation and perception. The stronger the supporting characters, the more it highlights the protagonist's awesomeness.

Listen to me, delete the descriptions where Hawkeye notices the protagonist getting stronger.

Why did the author have to copy the green-haired guy and use the three-sword style? It's a complete and utterly terrible plot point.

The main character looks a bit abstract.

The idea of ​​a four-sword style is ridiculous. Holding two swords in one hand—I can't even imagine it! Even if you had 100 swords in one hand, so what? Your strength wouldn't increase with the number of swords you hold; it would just look awkward.

Author, you've written so many books, how come your writing style is so poor?

No snowflake is innocent in an avalanche! So why do fanfiction writers and anime viewers all think the Navy is a righteous and necessary organization? What kind of illusion leads to this belief? Is it because of the so-called protection of civilians? Maintaining maritime security for member states? Is it just empty talk about justice?

The beginning is very interesting, and the writing style and pacing are well-developed. Keep it up, don't abandon the project!