Blue Star, Also a Pokémon Master!

I just refreshed site B. An up owner named sslenderrman is really nb. He hunted Pokémon monsters and did an ecological survey

I would like to give you a suggestion: when you can write a book in your free time after work, try to write as much as possible, but no matter how much you write, don't post it all. Only post one chapter a day, and save more manuscripts. Post them when you are busy at work to maintain the habit of reading updates every day.

The name of the book feels awkward. I didn't find you when searching for Monster Hunter. I searched for Blue Star after more than 20 years, and when I searched for Pokémon, I found you after more than 20 people. It's difficult to find you in Monster Hunter fandom. I found you by searching Pokémon at the beginning. I feel like the name can be changed.

This book was played to death by the author himself. It originally took a long time to update, but as a result, the author kept writing about a world with boring plots. As a result, fewer people read it. When the author saw that the results were not good, he didn't want to write anymore, which formed a vicious circle.

Here is a unified reply to several frequently asked questions. First, the issue of the attributes of monsters. Many friends say that it is not necessary to always have the dragon type, but for something like the Great Ferocious Jackal Dragon, except for the evil type, there are no other attributes that match it. I thought it was too monotonous, so I added a dragon type. Another example is the Dazzling Bird, which really has no attributes to give. If I only gave it a general type, some friends would definitely suggest adding a dragon type.                                           I understand the idea of ​​having richer attributes, and I will try my best to do it, but sometimes the attributes that can be given are just there, cannot be changed, and it is difficult to adjust by everyone, so please just trust my arrangement. Two, the size and strength of the monsters. I know that many people think that monsters are too big and look very different from Pokémon in strength, but in fact, there are many large Pokémon, such as Gyarados, which feels similar to a ichthyosaur, a fossil pterosaur like a small flying dragon, and a strange jaw dragon that is similar to a small theropod. It is recommended not to blindly believe in the sizes in the illustrations. In fact, many of them are inconsistent with the animations. I will follow the animations here. The illustrations are very outrageous, such as the seven-meter Rayquaza, the 1.6-Meter strange power, etc. Not to mention that Pokémon also have large and small gold, lords, and overlords. And Pokémon do not win by size. They are even more flexible when facing large monsters. Many well-trained Pokémon have moves that are not inferior to those of monsters or even ultimate moves. Coupled with the command of excellent trainers, they can completely compete with large monsters, let alone their attributes or weaknesses. I have also written before that there are benefits to monsters after acquiring the characteristics of Pokémon. For example, some attacks are strengthened as moves, but they also have to accept some of Pokémon's rules. For example, their attack and defense will be reduced, and their attributes will be more serious than before. Let's explain it this way. Kirin is an ancient dragon and is not big in size. However, do you think the Lightning Bird's lightning is inferior to that of Kirin? No, it is overwhelming and thunderous. So has the Three Sacred Birds at least reached the threshold of an ancient dragon? In addition to being slightly weaker in physical strength, it definitely has attack capabilities.       ，，?       ，，， And the monsters have an advantage, which is equivalent to having a "Pokémon" with excellent physical fitness from the beginning, but inferior to Pokémon in terms of skill proficiency. But the real qualitative change in physical fitness should start with the monsters with the strength of the Fire Dragon and above. Why is there such a sense of disparity? It is affected by the game mechanism. In Monster Hunter, as an average person, you fight monsters for more than ten minutes on average, or in Pokémon games, which one feels more fleshy after a few moves? But it is not comparable. And, as I said before, the moves of stronger Pokémon are not inferior to the attacks of monsters. In the ecological CG of monster hunting, many monsters actually decide life and death in just a few moves. Although there are some factors of disparity in strength, it also shows that if you have the attack power of monsters, it actually doesn't take long to defeat them. In short, don't think of ordinary large monsters as too powerful, and don't think of Pokémon as too weak. There is a gap in strength, but it also depends on which one is used to compare with each other. And the monsters are the protagonist's advantage!

Boom Dragon A flying dragon monster that retains its original appearance. His flying ability is not strong, but he can crawl and crash quickly with his terrifying limb strength. He has a ferocious temperament and a strong appetite. He dominates an area with his crazy crashes and earth-shattering roars, and is known as the "absolutely strong man". Attributes: Normal, Dragon Characteristics, (name undecided) Sound-type moves increased by 30% Dream Characteristics (hard claws) Contact-type moves increased by 30% "According to Xiaodao research, Honglong must have this characteristic if he wants to evolve into a wild hook claw" - an unknown monster trainer Exclusive skills: Roar (sound-type moves, damage 100, front feet on the ground to roar upwards, being hit will cause physical attack and physical defense , the speed is reduced by one level, and there is a chance of causing chaos. After using it, you will rest and cannot use the move in the next round) Dragon Cart (a contact move, damage 100, charge forward at high speed, up to three times in a row, except for the first time, there is a chance of failure every time, but every time it succeeds, the damage increases by 20) I have nothing to do recently, and it is too uncomfortable to chase books and chase, so I have nothing to do. I write down the thoughts in my mind and write them out for everyone to watch and laugh.

Let me explain some things here: First, I hope everyone can distinguish the difference between the game and reality. For example, in the game, certain monsters will only appear on certain maps. Although this design has ecological considerations for the monsters, it is just the design of the game. It does not mean that after the game becomes reality, other monsters will not appear in other places. The same is true for Pokémon. Of course, I will try my best to follow the game and ecological settings when writing a book. Second, I have only scratched the surface of Pokémon pvp. I may write down the routines, but I won't be too obsessed with the routines. Third, it is still about games and reality. The monsters in the game gradually become stronger as the game progresses, but this does not mean that in reality, these monsters are really much different from the monsters that first appeared. There may be some words that are a bit redundant for most people, but I still explain them.

The biggest flaw of this book is that the map size is copied from the game. The high ecological niches are all squeezed together, and you can encounter a lot of them within two steps. The New World is set to be a continent after all. You have to write down the size of the game map for time travel.

How can I put it, I feel like I have caught too many. If I catch all the ancient dragons, it would be too much. The bond between Pokémon is almost gone. When I go out to eat, it feels like half the forest is gone.

I used to write about the monster hunting ecology, and my writing was okay. However, the focus inexplicably shifted towards Pokémon, and the number of people started to decrease. Now I am just trying to clean up the world. You are leaving the readership to change, and you can't tell where the main plot is. Do you have an outline?