Chief Philanthropist

It's too complicated. The game is pretty good. Don't cover so many areas at once, at least don't deal with them all at once. You can write a longer chapter on one industry. It's too complicated and too long, and it doesn't feel immersive and it's also messy. Write more about the customer's perspective, or the impact on social changes, etc.

Threatening your life? Do good? Then what else should we look at?

Author, do you think system punishment is a poisonous point 😡

There is no need to become fat in one go. It is difficult to make a long-lasting game. If a game fails, you can make another game. There is no need to stick to the hit.

It's obviously not as good as the author's previous book. It makes people feel that the protagonist is frivolous and lacks brains.

You are invincible at the beginning. With artificial intelligence hacking technology, all the money in the world is yours. You have unlimited lifespan. You can use it whenever you want.

😴To me, it's all poisonous!

Author, why do you always write scientific articles? I always like to extend my tentacles to other places. I don't understand many places. At least I should do other things well first before doing anything else! You have done everything else, why do you need the country?

I can only lament that the gap between people is really huge You have written so many books, but you can't see any improvement Don't talk about writing, just talk about plot arrangement. The logic of character behavior seems to be a hurdle that you can never get over Some people get 100 points because the paper only has 100 points Some people get 100 points because they can only get 100 points You belong to the second type I always feel that the writer level is at lv3 or lv4. Basically, the book is really hard to read, but it also gave me a feeling of "He actually fell into a bottleneck period" According to common sense, when talking about the bottleneck period, it should be after achieving great achievements or making a breakthrough at a very high starting point. But I never expected that these low-level people actually have bottleneck periods? After thinking about it, I feel that it is not difficult to accept, and it is even very reasonable. But there is always a feeling that makes people laugh and laugh Inexplicably, it reminds me of a very funny saying "Poor students have more stationery" I always feel that this level should be your upper limit You should not be able to break through this upper limit, or if you can break through, you would have broken through already Of course All this is my own personal feeling, there is no point of reference, there is no understanding, just pure feelings.

After seeing this system punishment, I feel there is no need to watch it.

Let's rewrite "Rebirth of the Technological Flood" and use the golden finger of the book "Technological Flood" to make the protagonist reborn in the 1980s and run to Myanmar to develop. The protagonist's subordinates will not rebel, and the subordinates will stand on the front desk and act as leaders in public. The protagonist hides behind the scenes and controls Myanmar, develops Myanmar, and then cooperates with China for common development and indirectly participates in China's construction. This can also prevent the proportion of domestic protagonists from being too large and being reluctant to let go.

Should the 5-year lifespan of the purchase be used for one year? The purchased lifespan will also elapse five times? Is this a bug? As soon as these points are used, they begin to depreciate in value.

No matter how I read it, the first book Rebirth: The Flood of Technology was good-looking. The novels I wrote after that were too complicated.

How much does a mobile phone system cost? Are you crazy about money?

Congratulations to Little Pudding on his new book! 😍

Let's talk about poetry, power, or Jingtian.