Fabricating Lies and Making Them Come True: the Beginning Deceives Me into Cultivating Immortality

Without Emperor Qin to unify the Han Dynasty, people would only recognize themselves as people of their own country. The idea of ​​great unification is gone. We can't let people be in opposition all the time! Although there is a Chinese name in the front, it is not impressive enough! What does the author plan to do with the rest of the content?

It's not like the ancient times. The protagonist calls cultivators witches and powerful witches are gods.

There are some poisonous points in the second chapter. The protagonist is a centenarian but not many people know about him. In the third chapter, I start to show me the creation of Pangu. It can be said that it perfectly transforms this book from a fairy grass into a grain. Later, some book friends said that this is obviously more and more like the prehistoric period, but they are still denying it.

That's it for now. The author has no idea what the readers want to read. The readers come here not to see the protagonist show off his power, or to see you list some Taoist classics with a few thousand words, but to see the performance of these saints after they are truly extraordinary. Watch them establish sects and watch their performance. You don't know what to write. The protagonist is just a golden finger behind the scenes, just copying some classics every day and cheating here. The readers are not fools. You can't make money like this. Do you think your writing is really good if you find a few people at the end of this chapter to say it is good? Take a look at the book review section!

I don't understand why the protagonist can't just write himself into the myth and describe himself as the reincarnation of the sages and powerful people. After completing some task of spreading knowledge, he can obtain the power of his previous life, restore his divine power, and reach the sky in one step. If you have to compile a few exercises at random and practice step by step, you are not as good as others. Do you really think that you are wiser than the ancient sages? Moreover, even the myth of Pangu's creation of heaven can be faked and turned into reality, so what's wrong with adding a reincarnated god to it?

I hope it is an orthodox myth, and don't talk about the ancient times. [Nuwa], [Fuxi], [Da Yi], etc. Are all ancestors and sages, not witches and demons from the ancient times.

How should I put it? The problem is relatively big. Within 100 chapters, it is basically based on the setting. In other words, as a civilization with cultivation, the time span is too short, 10 years, 20 years, such a span, and the span is still the kind of big one that can pull the eggs, and there are , the characters are not three-dimensional at all, very flat, like Laozi and Confucius, the writing is not three-dimensional, there are too many typos, sometimes I even swallow the setting, there are many such plots, there is not enough food and grass, there is a feeling that it is tasteless and a pity to abandon

There is a problem with the writing. The behind-the-scenes stream is not like the group portrait stream. Why do you keep writing protagonists? When you write about the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, aren't you trying to capitalize on the popularity of various schools of thought? There are very few words about how to write about them. I always focus on writing about this moment of spiritual thoughts. There are hundreds if not thousands of these words.

The first chapter uses scientific knowledge to establish the character of an academic and heavenly person, and the next chapter popularizes feudal superstition, just like leading party members to sing praises to God before a Marxist-Leninist meeting.

This author keeps filling in the prehistoric setting, and he keeps trying to make sure I don't have it! It's really…

When there is no change at the beginning, it should be a cosmic worldview, and then later it is changed to a mythical worldview. How will the starry sky outside change? Did Pangu open the sky only to the scope of the earth, or did the entire universe change together?

The author has a common sense mistake. The pyramids in South America are the Temple of Asteca. They were built in the Song Dynasty, the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. There is no shadow of it. You are wrong. They are not that old.

I hope it won't have anything to do with Honghuangliu

The creativity is good, but there is no culture. Laozi and Taishang are real and have nothing to do with each other. Taishang is a Taoist who pulled Taoism's coat and made up a fictional character in the image of Laozi. Moreover, you have written Taoism as Taoism.

"I practice fast and my feelings are original. How can other people practice so fast... It feels like it is almost ruined. It only takes one glance at the technique to know it. It's too ridiculous. It shouldn't be fast if you have high understanding."

But even if all 7.4 Billion people on the earth believe it, can the universe be transformed into a round sky and a geocentric theory? This is a bit exaggerated, right? The sky in Pangu's sky is square and the earth is round, right?

It collapsed, and it was predicted that the author would soon become an eunuch

It would be good if you read the Classic of Mountains and Seas. Why do you have to go through the chaos?

Why is there so much nonsense? You have to describe something in one sentence back and forth.

When you talk about water, you talk about layout. What's the plan? Can't we go to Qin as soon as possible? A bunch of nonsense. What is the reaction of everyone in the lecture? What is the layout? When you give lectures, you first write down the reactions of the people around you, then the reactions in the country, then the natural reactions, and then the reactions of the people around you. "The people around you benefit the most." You wrote this sentence three times. What is it if it's not water? Journey to the Seven Kingdoms is very well written, but it doesn't work well when it's put on the shelves. If you just write these things every day when you put them on the shelf, you won't get good results. It's good to follow the way you wrote about the previous countries When people scold you, it's not because your writing is wrong, it's because you write a chapter of one hundred words in one sentence.

Please follow me

I feel that the biggest problem with this book is that the timeline is too messy. The myth compiled by the protagonist casually spans hundreds of thousands or billions of years. It is too exaggerated. There were no people at that time. How did the myth be recorded? Also, how many years was it planned to compile the Tribulation of Three Emperors so recently? It is only a few hundred years in total. If one emperor is compiled for tens of thousands of years, it would be too overwhelming. And those who went to the open land took too fast. The Chu country that the protagonist traveled the longest only lasted half a year, and the others usually only took a month. How long has it been? Not only did the Tian family occupy the island country, but they have also been canonized. With the ancient itinerary, shipbuilding technology, and manpower arrangements, you Not to mention decades, you should have it in 10 years, but you can finish it in a few months. You have written that it will take decades to walk through so many countries, and then occupy places, arrange relocation, build ships, leave the island, and ask for a seal in a few months. Is this reasonable? Not to mention ancient times, modern times are not as fast as you. When I was actually writing the mythology, the timeline was so long, and then when I was writing about the expansion of territory, the timeline was so short. It was so uncomfortable to watch.

It's a pity that the subject of this good idea is eunuchs. ! 🤫