The Age of Empires Begins with the Bandit King

I still like the subject matter, but the writing is a systematic article, and before I get started, a woman appears. How could it be so easy for you to meet a woman in that war-torn era? What's more, she's a beauty? There are only a few pictures, can't you bear it? Can the woman's plot be set a little later? Don't write in an urban sense when writing about hegemony, that would be too embarrassing!

I won't say anything else, anyone who has played Age of Empires knows what it is. The title of your book mentions the Age of Empires. Why would a strategic commander need to learn sword skills? Why go to fight with people? Your base won't explode, right? What did you write? I don't know where the fundamentals are. If you click into the empire, who will watch you love and fight? The explosive soldiers pushed all the way, what's wrong? It's really outrageous, with the Age of Empires system, you can really be the bandit king here. Toxic, Age of Empires fans should not read this. The activation of the Age of Empires system requires the commander to personally kill people, and kill them in the opening plot. At the beginning, friendly troops are killed by the plot, and enemies are killed by the plot. Obviously two people, wouldn't it be over if they just start two against one? Why do you have to wait until the others are finished killing before taking action? And if you kill a living person, why wouldn't you be more vigilant since there is a living person? It doesn't take a second for a person to turn his head.

Anyone who kills Manqing is a good friend (๑°3°๑)

I feel like you, the author, chose the wrong Jin Huzhi! Your way of writing is suitable for descriptions of cavalry and swordsmanship or Dynasty Warriors that emphasize the personal prowess of the general and small-scale battlefields, which are specific to the tactical level. However, in the Imperial Era, Shitong focused on the overall command level of the entire macro-battlefield and required the protagonist to act as the commander-in-chief and take charge of the overall situation! He is the commander-in-chief of an army and even the king of the country, not the vanguard of a fighting general who cuts off generals and flags! You made a mistake in your initial positioning of this book! If you don't believe me, compare "Coming to Middle-earth with a Riding and Cutting System" and "Sweeping the World". The former is a typical horse-and-chopping style. The protagonist must take part in every battle and take the lead in the charge. After the war, he also builds territory and recruits soldiers and horses. However, the focus of strategy is still on the tactical level. Specifically, the protagonist rushes into battle, cuts flags, and chops with blood. The two "Sweeping the World" is the authentic writing method of a commander commanding the entire army to grasp the overall situation on the battlefield from a macro perspective! What is a commander-in-chief? The formation of troops is based on the situation, not limited to fighting and killing hundreds or even thousands of people in the county, but looking at the overall situation and mobilizing the entire army or encircling the two wings with iron arms, or ambush suddenly appearing to attack from the front and rear, or the suspected troops are separated and the elite attack the center to break through! What you can see is an upright division with tens of millions of people arrayed in a majestic formation, fighting each other with uprightness and defeating each other with strangeness. The victory or defeat on the macro battlefield depends on the commanding art between the enemy and ourselves, as well as the configuration and elite level of the army's arms!

The identity of this armed policeman is really a failure.

Eunuch author + seedling. . . Let's wait until it's finished. :

With the system, you have to strike a balance after conquering a county, and divide the land into a town after conquering local tyrants. You have made all the mistakes that a strategist can make. The protagonist is a bandit with 1,800 people at hand, and you try to establish a base area. How did Wang Ming fail? When the Langya uprising occurs, if you don't take advantage of the Shandong rebel army's proliferation and develop it slowly, do you think the navy can defeat Zheng Zhilong or the army can deal with the sudden advance of the Eight Banners Army? In Shandong, why don't you capture the big city first and wait for death by guarding the seaside?

Are there too many flaws? The first is that the system population actually has an upper limit. Obviously you can use materials, money and other conditions to limit the population, but if you have to use this kind of coercion, it is too obvious to suppress the protagonist. Since it has a system, it's a cool story. It's not that cool stories can't overwhelm the protagonist, but they can't be too obvious, otherwise it won't be cool. Secondly, after the initial war, the government did not collect the corpses after victory, but left them exposed to the wild. Are they all fools? They didn't even know that exposing corpses for a long time would cause plague?

WOC, there are still people writing about the Age of Empires, I'm in tears 😭

I hope the author highlights the role of his subordinates rather than the protagonist's personal strength. After all, this is a hegemony novel. The protagonist has done everything, so why should his subordinates do anything?