Grand Governor of France

There is a problem. The protagonist can summon the army at the beginning because of the kingdom's order, which means that his authority comes from the royal family. If the army rebels and wants to overthrow the royal family, his authority will be gone. So why should a group of his officers have to obey orders from a foreigner? Normally speaking, shouldn't the army behead the protagonist for holding Mary hostage, then put a black hat on him to deliver a message to Louis XVI, and then gather the troops who were already rebellious along the way, and use the momentum to send the old nobles to the guillotine along the way? The protagonist has only been here a few days and has no power. Nine out of ten friends he has made are aristocratic women, and the officers he has met are not very close. There is no reason for him to become an army leader.

Take a look at what the great masters have written, and think about it yourself. Not to mention old masterpieces such as Mediterranean Overlord, Holy Roman Empire, and Foxes of France. Let's just say that the book King of France is pretty good.

I noticed that there is a question about family background and legal principles in the comment area. Let me explain to you the reason why the French army does not understand family background and legal principles. In the era of Louis XIV, there was a minister named Loire who recruited troops from civilians, which greatly increased the combat effectiveness of Louis XIV's army. In other words, as early as the period when the French monarchy was at its peak, the power of the common people began to rise, and the nobility began to fall into despair. Inducing the nobles to give up their military traditions and choose to live and die in Paris was the ultimate trick left by Louis XIV, the most powerful emperor, for his descendants. He was keenly aware that the French army full of civilians would one day resist the injustice of feudal power. In order to save the lives of future generations of kings, he treated the nobles of Paris as lambs to be slaughtered. He hoped that future kings would act decisively when the situation was irreversible and force the nobles who had no ability to resist to pay taxes with a knife, in order to appease the anger of the common people. It is a pity that Louis XVI in history was unable to understand the thoughts of his ancestors and did not dare to attack the nobles for the sake of the common people. That was the end of Bourbon.

What should a serious historical text look like? First of all, don't engage in this idea of ​​a boyfriend from heaven, or a lost oriental handsome man meeting a love-minded queen. It's been done like this since the beginning, without any sense of integration into the era, it just unfolds the plot and inserts various jokes... It looks weird.

It's a common problem in time-travel literature in ancient times. It's really uncomfortable to see people who travel through time and have a Chinese name among foreigners.

Overall this book has good and bad points, but I'd like to give some new friends a head start. 1. The protagonist is suspected of being a freeloader (very big). 2. The protagonist Jian established a new religion, Joan of Arc. 3. The protagonist is Napoleon's brainless braggadocio. As for resourcefulness, it's okay. The protagonist doesn't know how to fight and wants to see the people charging ahead. He can sneak away (at least not now)

The most ridiculous thing about this book is that it invites people with no foundation. It cannot hold a position in a place where interest disputes are so serious. There are many places to attack you. Foreigners, pagans, the differences outside are so obvious, I'll give you another devil,

After reading the first three chapters, the female channel flavor overflowed the screen.

In this period, if you have no family background and no legal knowledge, you still want to be a big boss...

Brothers, the contract was signed successfully. No matter whether the road ahead is sunny or snowy, I will keep moving forward. Please feel free to follow up. If you like this book, please support me~

It feels a bit too taken for granted.

The protagonist goes to the battlefield and kills a dozen British soldiers. Is this an anti-British drama? The author should not write in such a brainless way. He cannot withstand any scrutiny. He has not received any military training. The protagonist goes to the battlefield and kills one person with a mortality rate of 90%. Not to mention a dozen British soldiers. This is all right. Is this a cheat?

Author, you can form a team with the author who wrote the book "The King of France"

The author seems to have ignored one of the top generals at the time, Desaix. He was comparable to Napoleon, and even better in politics. If you look up his life, you will know how strong this man was. If he had not died young, he would have been Napoleon's most powerful partner. (In the Battle of Marengo, hundreds of cavalry pierced through tens of thousands of Austrian troops and turned defeat into victory.) Davout was just his little follower. Dig him out as soon as possible and form a golden partner with the protagonist

It's not that everyone is deliberately joking about you being a female author, but your romantic way of thinking really resembles that of a female author. Even if you are really a man, you must be a woman who was mistakenly reborn as a boy. This emotional line is very suitable for my taste as a male reader. Only a man with a woman's soul can write it.

To be honest, the female channel's plot and logic are relatively weak.

The author used to write romance novels, right?

In fact, I didn't watch it very well at the beginning, and I had a bit of a literary problem, but it got better later on, and it's getting better now, keep up the good work! Very good. If you take your time, you should be able to surpass King of France. As long as you don't overdo it and keep the rhythm, your results will not be bad!