Turn over the Clouds

I feel a bit contradictory. I think the male protagonist wants everyone to stop kneeling, so the price is that most of the characters who appear now have to die, because they are vested interests, and the author describes these characters as despising the lower class people in their bones. Of course, the author can also write them to change their minds, but it will ruin the characters, especially the sixth lady in the article has already written to kill several servants, and the other characters are not developed too much and the characters can be changed. If the author writes the characters who appear now so that the readers will be bored and die, they will not feel much, but if they are given a positive description, it would be a pity to write them dead, and it would be even worse to write them alive. So, I feel a bit contradictory.

Yes, what I usually hate most when reading historical novels are those stupid and stupid ones. The female characters in this novel have online IQs and are relatively less stupid, which is quite palatable. Secondly, the background is novel. It is the first time to see an empire in the steam age. It is quite interesting. The main plot is also quite clear.

What are you doing, author? In addition to this book, I see that you have written three books. None of them are about peasant uprisings or worker-peasant revolutions. They are all about the upper-level line Revolution of Qin. Not to mention, the protagonist wants to influence Qin Shihuang from the beginning. He is from the upper level and has not cultivated his own base. This cannot be cultivated. Men, just wait for Zhang Jiao to die, and you will be the Taoist Master of Taiping Dao. Now that Zhang Jiao is not dead, you can be considered half of it. You haven't cultivated your own basic base, and you haven't told your senior brothers about your ambitions and goals. In this book, I married Miss Xie and used her political influence, but I still didn't have my own base and didn't cultivate comrades. They keep describing class suffering, but they fail to cultivate comrades. I don't know what others think. Anyway, I don't want to take the upper-level route. The protagonist is now trapped in the rules of feudalism and the bourgeoisie, and the protagonist is still thinking about how to win within the rules. Even if you go to rebel somewhere else, then negotiate an exchange of interests with this Dayun, and then slowly cultivate comrades and blossom everywhere. These are troubled times and modern times, when the cause of communism is making rapid progress, but you are rising to the top! When Lenin founded the Soviet Union, he only thought that if he could survive longer than the Paris trade union, he would be successful. If you want to temper the protagonist's will, it is not impossible to temper it in the revolution. I also think that the best and fastest way to temper the will is in the struggle between iron and fire. There is no need to go up to the upper level, this is no longer the ancient times.

On the surface, the author writes that the protagonist wants to overthrow oppression, but why do I always feel that the protagonist wants to be seen as a domineering person? Why don't you stop pretending and just wake up and take over the world, get drunk and lie on the knees of a beautiful woman.

Why does it feel like the author is kneeling and shouting for freedom?

After reading it, I am speechless. It is good to read, but if you publish this subject at the beginning, it will be difficult to write about it later, unless you go crazy and take other paths. So I will burn incense here in advance

I have never been superstitious about the market and firmly believe that good writing can break everything. Come on.

Everyone, I'm withdrawing! The reason is probably that the protagonist is holding the noble's thigh while sharpening his knife to chop him! Even under the banner of righteousness, it can't change the character of the protagonist, who is just a "selfish white-eyed wolf"!

He is not willing to understand his enemies at all, and thinks that his enemies are still stereotypes. The old society is not without smart people. Don't think that you can change everyone by yourself, just like our society relies on the overall strength to change individuals.

It seems that there are more than ten chapters. I originally wanted to read some good niche online articles, but I was struck by lightning at the beginning. A pound of sweet potatoes costs six cents, and a pound of chicken and fish costs about one cent. The author himself said that one dollar is equivalent to three to five thousand in future generations. He actually pities the old man who runs the stall and earns two or three cents a day, which is equivalent to a daily income of one thousand yuan. He even followed his teacher to conduct an investigation. The old man said that a family of six eats and drinks for only a few cents a month. These prices are crazy! In the large-scale high-tech farming in the United States, the price of meat is not that much different from that of biscuits and sweet potatoes, and the income from stalls cannot be so high. They also despise the old man's low income (can feed 60 people). The meat-related industries, pig herders, chicken and duck farmers, fishing workers, and large farmers and landowners, are selling at this price?

The world view of this book doesn't feel very reasonable. Dayun should currently have three social structures. Land and factories under the control of the emperor. Land under the control of nobles and gentry. A factory controlled by some nobles. This structure is actually very similar to Spain, but Spain's industrial capabilities are very weak. It actually has a large number of colonies, but they were dumped by Britain and France. Why is Spanish industry weak? Because without free market competition, there will be no efficiency. History has illustrated this countless times. A monopolistic and bureaucratic economic system like Dayun is bound to have low production efficiency and lacks motivation to expand production. For example, the emperor was a monopoly in many industries, or an administrative monopoly. In this case, what most people want to think about is not expanding production and developing technology. This conflicts with Dayun in the book who is eager to open the market. On the other hand, it is abnormal for nobles and businessmen to be so honest. . . It has all developed to this point. Profit became the supreme belief, and feudal morality began to decline. Why are you so honest?

The author's books, especially those at the bottom of the society in ordinary rather than disaster periods, whose words, deeds, and habits will make you feel like blood is splattered on your face when you read them. This cannot be found in other online articles.

I have abandoned this book. Obviously, the author is screening readers. Because you kneel to others, you must kill those who have knelt down. . . Brother, in feudal society, what should we do with the princes, emperors, crown princes, etc. We encounter later? Some readers said what it symbolizes. . . If a novel does this, what will readers in this fast era think of it? . . In a strange era, people are struggling to survive. Everyone reads it as a refreshing article, not as a preacher. In the end, this book opened high but went low, and the results speak for themselves.

It is suggested that the author remove the slave identity of the protagonist. In an era when slaves can be beaten to death at any time, the protagonist's identity restricts his development. It is estimated that others will pay some money if they beat the slave to death. Why does the protagonist do so many things and like to bicker? It is simply unrealistic.

If this book is not banned, if the core idea is not changed, and the author is not dismissed because of the small number of readers, I will definitely subscribe to it all.

You are just complaining that others don't understand. It's really amazing. Firstly, the protagonist didn't say any purpose at the beginning and didn't explain the reason for kneeling in one sentence. Secondly, when thinking about his murderous purpose, he didn't give any hints or vague references and even directly wrote more than a dozen words and named King Chen. Thirdly, he didn't have any description of his heart for others or even a fluctuation in his heart, not even a complaint about the ghost world. Based on these contents, the protagonist is not just a person who wants revenge for dignity or something else at the beginning. The protagonist can slowly grow up and awaken, instead of just killing people for revenge against the old society from the beginning. I really don't understand that you guys are so blind. You can have so much content without any hint. Is the author better than Lu Xun and others? Anti-di and anti-feudal, some are written front and back, and some are hidden. They are all works that can be seen. These works themselves are directional. Are you afraid that others will not understand? The author himself has just this much content in the previous chapters. How many times do I have to read and understand each word before I can post a comment?

The only drawback is that always thinking about killing is a bit unclear. It's okay to want to be a master, and it's okay to kill each other after turning over. But thinking about killing every day when you have nothing is a bit low. Killing is not the purpose. There are many ways to get angry, so why not let the other party kneel on you or something like that.

The protagonist is supposed to be engaged in a fake revolution

Wenqing, sour and poisonous, died

Personally, I understand that "killing" has more of a symbolic meaning. In an entire absurd feudal society, the oppressed time-travelers do have the desire to change the entire world.

Did the author make the Dayun Dynasty in this book too strong? In 1919, dozens of wars were launched and the surrounding countries were beaten up Is this comprehensive national strength stronger than that of Great Britain back then? This is too difficult for the GM... Maybe the protagonist will struggle all his life just to light a fire? This fire may still set other weak countries on fire It is better to go to the surrounding weak countries to become GMs and the hope may be greater The situation of Russia and China cannot be replicated in a top power Is it possible for the protagonist to directly defeat a superpower in one wave? Britain also fought two world wars, and it took half a century to finish all its gains

Who knows how to tear off a new vest? Tell me to get off