NBA: From the Start, I Fused with Wilt Chamberlain in His Later Years

I was enjoying the story, and then they had to bring up an $800,000 debt. It's 2022, and there are still authors like this? What a treasure of an author!

Personally, I think Chamberlain's actual ability wasn't that great; it's just that the overall level of basketball players in that era wasn't high.

Why does everyone keep bringing Iverson into this? Is it really that interesting? Besides cleaning up his defense and grabbing rebounds on offense, what else can you do alongside Iverson? If his offense is a 99 and his defense is a 40, then all you're good for is gambling and steals.

Those who can survive chapters nine and ten must have very high poison resistance.

If you're playing center, don't try any fancy moves. If you're a center and you try to imitate Allen Iverson's signature move, how much damage will that do to a center's knees and ankles? If you like doing fancy moves, you should write about guards.

What's with starting with an 800,000 RMB debt? Is it a deliberate attempt to purify the readership? Furthermore, Iverson wasn't suited to playing alongside a dominant center. At his height, to succeed in the NBA, he needed the ball in his hands and to be the primary offensive weapon. His best center pairings were always present, like Timberwolves in 2001.

The author needs to understand what talent is before speaking. Does talent really matter from different years? And this talk about Chamberlain's talent in seasons 1972-73? Talent is something predetermined at birth.

It's a bit of a shame about the setup; without that loan incident, he could have entered the NBA as a lottery pick.

The author is really weak; over two hundred chapters only cover twelve regular season games, and other parts are glossed over. Furthermore, talent is fixed and doesn't diminish regardless of age.

Is it really meaningful to keep writing about centers who are over 2 meters tall?