Global Hearing: I Became the Defender of Qin Shihuang

It's a bit frustrating. Although I know it's a novel, I'm still a little unhappy. Qin Shihuang made the greatest contribution to the unification of China by allowing foreigners to judge him. I hope that the author will let the First Emperor come from a parallel time and space to kill this court in the future. Who do you think he is?

After reading the name, why did Qin Shi Huang want the world to be judged? .

Tsk tsk! A bunch of idiots! Using the words passed down by the First Emperor after he unified the culture, and scolding the First Emperor for being cruel, what does this mean?

The comment section is so negative. Did you see the back? Not much, just watch Qin Shihuang leave. Comment after reading it and see what you think? Damn it, my eyes hurt from the tears of a man! Please add some details, thank you!

Just one thing to say, if you want to read this book, you must first become wise

The ancestor of China, Qin Shihuang, will not be tarnished by anyone or any story.

More than 2,000 years of people were killed to earn living expenses.

The power of Fen Sixth World unified the world. How could a tyrant achieve great unification? It is said that Han died by force, but it is more appropriate to think that Qin died by force. When the Qin Dynasty fell, there were still hundreds of thousands of troops. If Fusu was the second emperor of Qin, then the elimination of hundreds of schools of thought that only respected Confucianism would have been around a hundred years ago. The Han people might even be called Qin people! ? !

If the protagonist's ancestors were tomb robbers, we can come up with the idea of ​​why the protagonist knows so many ancient tombs.

Don't you even have basic logic? Merits can prove that you are a wise king, but you cannot deny that you are a tyrant. How can you be a history major? Kings are generally divided into wise kings and cowardly kings, and tyrants and benevolent kings. He can be a tyrant plus a wise king, such as Qin Shihuang, or a benevolent king plus a wise king, such as Emperor Wen of Han Dynasty, or a tyrant plus a cowardly king, such as Emperor Sui Yang. It is not the so-called meritorious one who is not a tyrant. The two are not the same concept at all.

Is Qin Shihuang considered a tyrant? When I saw the protagonist admitting that he is a tyrant, I immediately stopped looking at the comment section and started to criticize him. In most dynasties in history, the emperor of the previous dynasty and their immediate family members were killed first. Qin Shihuang was wrong to keep the royal families of the six kings, he was too kind. As a result, he was criticized in various ways as soon as he died. Confucianism is the most vicious. How could the Qin Dynasty be so easily destroyed if hundreds of thousands of soldiers were not guarding the border?

It is now popular for historical celebrities to overturn the verdict, and their stance has never been on people's livelihood, but on safeguarding the emperor's rights. Centralization of power is good.

The entire universe is so big, so don't judge things that are harmful to the universe. Instead, try a civilization that can't even get out of a single planet. This is how much leisure you have to have. The person being interrogated can affect the operation of the universe. Just looking at the introduction is embarrassing to death.

If you are serious, you can find many illogical places: the Dragon Kingdom in this world is more scientifically advanced, but the tombs that can be found in the Dragon Kingdom in the previous life cannot be found here! Forget it...

This is the current Qidian Chinese website. If this book had not caught the eye of editors before 2015, would it still be on the shelves? ? ? Thinking too much

Why not judge but judge? What qualifications do our descendants have to judge?

This book is fundamentally wrong. For example, to judge the kings of various countries, except for international disputes, one can only judge one's own people, and cannot enforce laws across borders. Those who belong to China belong to China, and those who belong to foreign countries belong to foreign countries. No matter whether we look at foreign countries through the eyes of Chinese people or China through the eyes of foreigners, different cultural differences are like tinted glasses, which are somewhat biased and will always lose fairness. This book is a typical example of transnational law enforcement and there is no fairness at all.

It was supposed to be a cool article! My writing skills are not good. I just can't write anything.

It's not easy to collect a planet of imbeciles 😁

Are all people these days such diodes? Either black or white. The First Emperor's sins could not cover up his achievements, and similarly his achievements could not erase his sins. It's like Zhang Xun, who defended a city and conquered the world, and made great contributions to the country, but it was also true that he allowed cannibalism. Human beings are not inherently black and white.