Master of Natural Disaster Synthesis

Tucao Post With such ability, why not search wildly for resources in the wild? Isn't the basis of the synthesis conditions of natural disaster troops resources? When you build a huge team, people will tell you everything you want to know, because those who don't tell you will die under your ocean of natural disasters. What did you want to know when you were still weak? The people you can come into contact with are all similar to you. How can a stronger person care about you, an ant? It's possible for someone to annoy you and even slap you to death. To give an inappropriate example, a primary school student asks a professor about advanced mathematics. You, a primary school student, have to reach that level to understand, right? Otherwise, how can this professor explain the knowledge to you without even knowing the equations? A being who can even play with the entire planet at will. How could anyone tell you unless you reach a certain level? Everything should be understood based on your own strength. Don't turn your advantages into strength, but rush to an unknown, possibly very dangerous place. Who gave you the courage so that you won't die there? Your four major natural disasters all have to form a vast ocean to be called a natural disaster. Now you can't even form a zombie tide and go out to wave? Okay, I've read more than 20 chapters for now, so I'll stop complaining here.

... It was quite strange from the beginning. I felt that if it were a game, the protagonist's hacking would be too strong. Everyone else would play the game the same way, but without hanging, it would feel very unbalanced. If a special adventure could be set, it might be more reasonable.

This is too watery. There are no other players, just NPCs. It is recommended to refer to the counterattack of the weak in the world.

I think the author can refer to the book "Online Game Trial". They are all about games and have similar styles. However, that game can be resurrected, while your game only has one life. That novel is really worth studying 🤓

The writing is too dry and it reads like chewing wax. I am also an old writer, but I feel like I haven't made much progress. I am also an old reader of yours, and I have glanced at each of your books. Generally speaking, this book is the most creative, and it can also be regarded as the most promising book in recent years. Write carefully, you may get good results. Why does your book do this? The core reason is that I do not position myself as an author in the narrative perspective of the novel. An example from the original text: "Chen Wei took one look at the ammunition transported in the transport truck and understood why they were following them. All of them were huge revolving bombs made of steel. It's the kind of thing called a Steel Star. I don't know which version this is, but with such a huge size in front of him, as well as the barbs on it, and the space inside that can be used to hold various liquids, Chen Wei understands that it will definitely not be simple after throwing this thing out. " The writer's perspective should be like this: "Chen Wei looked at the ammunition transported in the transport truck in confusion, wondering why they were following. When he walked to the transport truck, he found that all the ammunition on it were huge revolving bombs made of steel. After several versions of updates, this stone-throwing bomb called Steel Star , showing a huge size, and the barbs on it can be used to hold various liquids. The power of this kind of thing is definitely not simple when thrown out. " You write exactly what comes to mind, basically treating yourself as a reader, and writing whatever comes to mind. But readers are not tapeworms in your head. You think you have written down all your ideas, but in fact many details are only in your mind and have not been presented to the readers. This is why most novels are written in the third person. You can selectively tell part of the story and let the readers figure out the rest. I thought about it when I was revising it. It seemed that you wrote it in the third person, but in fact it was written in the first person. No wonder it was so awkward. If you write in the first person and don't have strong writing skills, you will get twice the result with half the effort. I hope it can be of some help to the author. Today's readers are more picky, and it will become increasingly difficult if you don't polish your works carefully.

Please support me a lot, recommend a lot, and promote a lot. Thank you.

To be honest, Yu Min is okay this time. Yu Min is the kind of person who has good ideas but always has some poison in his writing. I was addicted to the previous few assignments before I even saw them on the shelves. This one is slightly better. I hope the Feathermen will keep it up

Brother, stop writing randomly, if you really can't copy it yourself, don't feel ashamed, so just copy the online game trial, refine it and add the themes of these years, it's absolutely 🔥. Full booking

Let me save you a paw first. I have read many of his books before, but the reviews are all first-class creativity, second-rate construction, and third-rate writing. Even if you find a ghostwriter, you can become popular. I don't know how this one will be. I hope I can slap myself in the face.

Lao, you haven't used this ability very much. It's outrageous to use your body to transform skeletons for your subordinates. Wouldn't it be stronger to synthesize it yourself? (To put it bluntly, the author is rubbish. He has no creative ideas, which is a loss for this subject matter.) After a long time, you only have a small number of troops. The legion has no characteristics. Lao

Yumin has nothing to say, Shuang Jue. Absolutely awesome creativity, data flow settings and absolutely brilliant writing.

In more than ten years, you have written ten books with more than one million words, and they are still under third-level contracts. How do you persevere? 👍👍🙏

The most novel thing about this theme is free synthesis. Instead of developing new and different synthesis formulas to match the characteristics of the units in combat, we are instead following the old path of invincible heroes with many soldiers. It feels like putting the cart before the horse. Corpses are used to summon skeletons instead of experimenting with the role of soldiers synthesized from different items. Don't you feel the benefits that your first unit brings to you also include Mimics? Neither strengthen nor upgrade. I have never systematically sorted out and researched my own talents, which is a reckless thing. I learned how to make torches to synthesize zombies at the beginning. There is no similar research after that. You can abandon and destroy useless troops. If you have different success ratios, you can get a copy of the repeatedly obtained resources for synthesis reference. The theme is synthesis, which will later become a natural disaster, not an invincible hero. PS: The old problem of theme books is urgent time management. In fact, if you are not in a hurry, the old players who compete on the same stage hundreds of years earlier than you can't catch up. Catching up is a problem. In fact, the time of primitive accumulation is not rushed. It is true to highlight one key point.

Feathermen! I beg you, is it so difficult to honestly write an online game article that is like a trial? The first dozen or so pictures in this book have a trial-like feel. I was really fascinated by the result. . . As soon as those earthlings came out, the protagonist's cold and pretentious style instantly kicked me out of that atmosphere.

Nothing has changed in more than 10 years, do you understand?

The creativity is very good, and the writing is really impressive. It's not that the plot is too poisonous, but the writing is really problematic.

It's so strange. Any standard military unit can refute the protagonist's words, and some NPCs who are clearly at an absolute disadvantage can still talk to the protagonist on an equal footing and even make conditions.

This is my opinion. If the Torch Walking Dead doesn't have hundreds of people playing saturation bombing, there won't be any of them. I'll be speechless

Damn it, is the author forgetful? Are you writing about a game or a gamification of reality? Have you figured it out? The protagonist's speech is really stupid.

Obviously the online game Judgment has been a very good hero and invincible novel in recent years. Why are the few books you wrote later not so good? Is your debut the peak...

The old author of the two-spined salamander who transformed, turned out to be still level 3 after more than ten years.

You, your sixteen books are still level three, don't you know how to write self-knowledge, and then this book has more than one million words and a dozen monthly tickets, and you still haven't woken up? ? ?