Disaster Synthesis Master

I think the author can refer to the book "Online Game Trial". They are all about games and have similar styles. However, that game can be resurrected, while your game only has one life. That novel is really worth studying 🤓

The writing is too dry and it reads like chewing wax. I am also an old writer, but I feel like I haven't made much progress. I am also an old reader of yours, and I have glanced at each of your books. Generally speaking, this book is the most creative, and it can also be regarded as the most promising book in recent years. Write carefully, you may get good results. Why does your book do this? The core reason is that I do not position myself as an author in the narrative perspective of the novel. An example from the original text: "Chen Wei took one look at the ammunition transported in the transport truck and understood why they were following them. All of them were huge revolving bombs made of steel. It's the kind of thing called a Steel Star. I don't know which version this is, but with such a huge size in front of him, as well as the barbs on it, and the space inside that can be used to hold various liquids, Chen Wei understands that it will definitely not be simple after throwing this thing out. " The writer's perspective should be like this: "Chen Wei looked at the ammunition transported in the transport truck in confusion, wondering why they were following. When he walked to the transport truck, he found that all the ammunition on it were huge revolving bombs made of steel. After several versions of updates, this stone-throwing bomb called Steel Star , showing a huge size, and the barbs on it can be used to hold various liquids. The power of this kind of thing is definitely not simple when thrown out. " You write exactly what comes to mind, basically treating yourself as a reader, and writing whatever comes to mind. But readers are not tapeworms in your head. You think you have written down all your ideas, but in fact many details are only in your mind and have not been presented to the readers. This is why most novels are written in the third person. You can selectively tell part of the story and let the readers figure out the rest. I thought about it when I was revising it. It seemed that you wrote it in the third person, but in fact it was written in the first person. No wonder it was so awkward. If you write in the first person and don't have strong writing skills, you will get twice the result with half the effort. I hope it can be of some help to the author. Today's readers are more picky, and it will become increasingly difficult if you don't polish your works carefully.

Please support me a lot, recommend a lot, and promote a lot. Thank you.

To be honest, Yu Min is okay this time. Yu Min is the kind of person who has good ideas but always has some poison in his writing. I was addicted to the previous few assignments before I even saw them on the shelves. This one is slightly better. I hope the Feathermen will keep it up

Brother, stop writing randomly, if you really can't copy it yourself, don't feel ashamed, so just copy the online game trial, refine it and add the themes of these years, it's absolutely 🔥. Full booking

Let me save you a paw first. I have read many of his books before, but the reviews are all first-class creativity, second-rate construction, and third-rate writing. Even if you find a ghostwriter, you can become popular. I don't know how this one will be. I hope I can slap myself in the face.

Lao, you haven't used this ability very much. It's outrageous to use your body to transform skeletons for your subordinates. Wouldn't it be stronger to synthesize it yourself? (To put it bluntly, the author is rubbish. He has no creative ideas, which is a loss for this subject matter.) After a long time, you only have a small number of troops. The legion has no characteristics. Lao

Yumin has nothing to say, Shuang Jue. Absolutely awesome creativity, data flow settings and absolutely brilliant writing.

In more than ten years, you have written ten books with more than one million words, and they are still under third-level contracts. How do you persevere? 👍👍🙏

The most novel thing about this theme is free synthesis. Instead of developing new and different synthesis formulas to match the characteristics of the units in combat, we are instead following the old path of invincible heroes with many soldiers. It feels like putting the cart before the horse. Corpses are used to summon skeletons instead of experimenting with the role of soldiers synthesized from different items. Don't you feel the benefits that your first unit brings to you also include Mimics? Neither strengthen nor upgrade. I have never systematically sorted out and researched my own talents, which is a reckless thing. I learned how to make torches to synthesize zombies at the beginning. There is no similar research after that. You can abandon and destroy useless troops. If you have different success ratios, you can get a copy of the repeatedly obtained resources for synthesis reference. The theme is synthesis, which will later become a natural disaster, not an invincible hero. PS: The old problem of theme books is urgent time management. In fact, if you are not in a hurry, the old players who compete on the same stage hundreds of years earlier than you can't catch up. Catching up is a problem. In fact, the time of primitive accumulation is not rushed. It is true to highlight one key point.