Greece: The Ascension Era

The protagonist is described as very naive, and it doesn't feel like he has received compulsory education, or has not studied well at all... He has no concept of responsibility, obligation, desire and restraint. He talks beautifully but has a very low bottom line... Such a protagonist seems extremely stupid. Although the author emphasizes on showing the growth of the protagonist, if he does not even have the basic qualities and thinking of a normal person, and is like a slave of desire all day long, don't expect readers to persist and wait. It is understandable that the author wants to edit the plot by sharpening the protagonist, but a protagonist with such a low limit will not arouse the desire to read, but will mostly make complaints... The suggestion is not to emphasize the upper and lower limits of human nature, but to describe the protagonist as a normal person, with desires and restraints, but to describe the influence of divinity and divine body on him, so that the protagonist's stupid performance can be understood by readers. Now it's really not good to just act stupid, and it also insults the readers' intelligence...

As a mere stranger, I can honestly say that this book is really good. My second uncle and grandpa read it and praised it.

At present, the protagonist is a bit weak. The big stallion Zeus has too strong connections. There are too many goddesses in Greek mythology. Zeus can basically get their support whenever he makes a move. The Earth Mother also supports Zeus. Compared to the protagonist, the protagonist is really inferior.

Brother, do you want to be an eunuch? What are you writing now? If you're making fun of yourself, just pretend I didn't say it.

It feels so disgusting to go to the time line of Zeus. I would rather believe that the original author is dead and you are continuing it. I don't want to believe that this was written by one person. It's simply disgusting to the extreme.

What did you write in these pictures? A god's text is not happy to play with fate and resistance. If you can't write it down and deduce it, just let it flow from heaven. If there are gods, they must all be materialists. They are a collection of concepts and materials. How could they succumb to fate? No one wants to read about the so-called bottom line and salvation of time travellers. That's not the tone your article gave people at the beginning. It was originally about looking at the collection of myths and lol ascendants. As a result, the chapters on resistance are sloppy, and the concepts and institutional systems of the gods are not included. Relying on fighting each other like savages to gain divine power has not made any improvements. It is obvious that you can slowly write about the alliance of gods and the construction of institutional strength, ideas and concepts. The world of Olympus can be built better, the gods can be promoted, and ordinary things can be promoted to gods. You can write more about the epics and social changes on the planet. As a result, the second generation God King left to fight against the first generation, and the writing was sloppy.

I really don't want to order these chapters. What exactly does the author want to talk about? . . Do you still remember your power of ascension? Look at the title of the book. I only know that when I was in school, I would go off topic when writing essays. Your outline is wrong. Do readers want to know why you did this?

I regretted it so much that I just changed the protagonists in these two chapters. The writing was so bland that I might as well have bought a copy of Greek Mythology myself.

The previous ones are okay. What have I been writing since I leaned over Hades? I'm playing house, right?

The author should not belittle the gods of Greek mythology in the article, because the protagonist is no different from them. I thought you were imagining the pantheon of a new civilization and wanted to express the collision of two different pantheons. As a result, the heroes of the alliance then copied another Greek pantheon. Then you might as well just speed up the pace, find strength in every possible way, and create ascendants. This way, we can see the battle between God and the Ascended one more quickly. Moreover, there is a contradiction. Since Nemesis wants to be the queen, why doesn't she go to Zeus? She made it clear to Zeus directly that she didn't mind his messing around. Zeus will definitely make her his queen. There is no need to find other women for the protagonist to enrich his power like now. Even if the protagonist lets her become the queen in the end, it won't be any different from being Zeus's queen. After all, they are both queens, and both the protagonist and Zeus will have many women. I feel that Zeus is better than the protagonist to a certain extent. After all, Zeus never hides that he is looking for a woman, and the protagonist is both responsible and upright. If you want to find it, you need Nemesis.